Estadísticas / Fútbol / Turkey. 1. Lig / Bandırmaspor vs Sivasspor

Bandırmaspor vs Sivasspor Statistics & Analysis

May 02, 2026 - 13:00
1 1.30
0 0.92
xG Accuracy: 72%
Casa de apuestas premium 1xBet: los nuevos usuarios pueden usar el código promocional 1x_3342271. Registrarse

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the model’s highlighted side (or lean) to what happened at full time.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Más / Menos de 2.5 Menos de 2.5 Menos de 2.5 (1 goals) ✔ Correct
  • Ambos Equipos Marcarán BTTS No No ✔ Correct
  • 1X2 Bandırmaspor Bandırmaspor ✔ Correct
  • Perspectivas de marcador exacto 1-0 1-0 ✔ Correct

Informe IA del partido

Resumen del partido IA

Below is a compact, numbers-first snapshot aligned with the same engine as the cards above.

  • League: 1. Lig
  • Fixture: Bandırmaspor vs Sivasspor
  • Kickoff: 2026-05-02 16:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 43.7% · Draw 31.6% · Away 24.7%
  • xG (showing): Bandırmaspor 1.3 — Sivasspor 0.92 (total xG ≈ 2.22)
  • Primary / headline line (Betting Primary Pick when shown): Under 2.5 goals
  • Model: 61.7% · Implied: 50.2% · Probability edge: +11.5 pts · Est. EV: +17.2%
  • BTTS (model): Yes 45.4% · No 54.6%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-0 (14.1%)

Totals and BTTS are evaluated against current market prices where available.

Correct score remains high-variance even when a line is most likely on paper.

Mejor apuesta y razones

Primary pick from the decision engine: Under 2.5 goals.

Model probability is compared to implied probability from odds to highlight a probability edge; EV uses the same model probability with the best decimal price tracked.

No pick is a guarantee; variance is especially large in scoreline markets.

FAQ

Safer market than correct score?

Markets with more liquidity and smoother prices (often 1X2 or O/U 2.5 from many books) are usually easier to reason about than long-tail correct-score prices; still read EV on each leg.

What changes first if odds move?

Implied probabilities and EV move immediately with price; model probabilities in this snapshot do not update until the pipeline is re-run. Refresh after material line moves.

What is the best-supported line in this snapshot?

Match the hero card above: if it says “Betting Primary Pick”, that leg cleared primary rules; if it says “Best +EV (tracked markets)”, it is the strongest +EV line that did not meet stricter Primary thresholds. The bullets below repeat the same model %, implied %, edge (pts), and EV % as that card.

Is the most likely correct score a good bet?

Usually no as a standalone bet: the “most likely” scoreline is still a low absolute probability tail event (often single digits, sometimes low teens). Use it as context; keep any correct-score stake in the “fun / small” bucket.

Factores de riesgo

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Metodología

  • Inputs: Same structured facts bundle as the public prediction page (xG / Poisson snapshot, market EV where available, decision engine v2).
  • Narrative: Template sentence library with fixture-stable selection (no per-request LLM for this block).
  • Compliance: Educational framing only; not personalised advice.

Última actualización

May 01, 2026 (UTC)

¿Cómo usar esto?
  • Concéntrese en la línea principal cuando desee una idea viable.
  • No combine muchas púas de punta fina;Los bordes no se suman de manera confiable.
  • Trate las apuestas arriesgadas como jugadas opcionales y de alto riesgo únicamente.

Obtén predicciones premium para Bandırmaspor & Sivasspor!

Desbloquea análisis en profundidad, consejos de apuestas exclusivos y pronósticos de partidos con nuestro servicio de suscripción premium.

Suscríbete ahora
Volver a Estadísticas
1. Lig 1. LigClasificación
# EQUIPO PJ G E P Pts
1 Erzurumspor FK 38 23 12 3 81
2 Amed 38 21 11 6 74
3 Esenler Erokspor 38 21 11 6 74
4 Çorum FK 38 21 8 9 71
5 Bodrum FK 38 18 10 10 64
6 Pendikspor 38 16 15 7 63
7 Keçiörengücü 38 16 12 10 60
8 Bandırmaspor 38 16 12 10 60
9 Manisa F.K. 38 16 7 15 55
10 Sivasspor 38 14 11 13 53
11 İstanbulspor 38 13 13 12 52
12 Sarıyer 38 15 7 16 52
13 Iğdır FK 38 13 11 14 50
14 Vanspor FK 38 13 10 15 49
15 Boluspor 38 14 6 18 48
16 Ümraniyespor 38 13 7 18 46
17 Serik Spor 38 11 6 21 39
18 Sakaryaspor 38 8 10 20 34
19 Hatayspor 38 2 8 28 14
20 Adana Demirspor 38 1 3 34 -57
# EQUIPO PJ GF GC +/- Pts
1 Erzurumspor FK 38 82 27 +55 81
2 Esenler Erokspor 38 81 35 +46 74
3 Amed 38 81 42 +39 74
4 Keçiörengücü 38 73 43 +30 60
5 Bodrum FK 38 71 39 +32 64
6 Çorum FK 38 63 39 +24 71
7 Boluspor 38 61 57 +4 48
8 Pendikspor 38 58 33 +25 63
9 İstanbulspor 38 57 55 +2 52
10 Manisa F.K. 38 57 56 +1 55
11 Vanspor FK 38 52 47 +5 49
12 Iğdır FK 38 52 54 -2 50
13 Bandırmaspor 38 47 34 +13 60
14 Sivasspor 38 47 43 +4 53
15 Ümraniyespor 38 47 51 -4 46
16 Sakaryaspor 38 45 72 -27 34
17 Sarıyer 38 44 44 0 52
18 Serik Spor 38 44 75 -31 39
19 Hatayspor 38 33 102 -69 14
20 Adana Demirspor 38 22 169 -147 -57
# EQUIPO PJ xG xGC +/- Pts
1 Bodrum FK 38 36.3 21.7 +14.6 64
2 Boluspor 38 34.5 20.9 +13.6 48
3 Erzurumspor FK 38 26.5 14.2 +12.3 81
4 Çorum FK 38 32.2 20.3 +11.9 71
5 Esenler Erokspor 38 30.7 19.1 +11.6 74
6 Amed 38 37.6 26.5 +11.1 74
7 Keçiörengücü 38 35.2 24.2 +11.0 60
8 Iğdır FK 38 28.2 21.6 +6.6 50
9 Pendikspor 38 29.8 24.3 +5.5 63
10 Bandırmaspor 38 26.5 23.2 +3.3 60
11 Manisa F.K. 38 29.0 29.1 -0.1 55
12 Vanspor FK 38 24.9 25.2 -0.3 49
13 Sarıyer 38 24.4 27.4 -3.0 52
14 Sivasspor 38 22.2 25.2 -3.0 53
15 İstanbulspor 38 25.2 28.8 -3.6 52
16 Ümraniyespor 38 23.9 27.9 -4.0 46
17 Serik Spor 38 20.8 29.9 -9.1 39
18 Sakaryaspor 38 24.7 34.1 -9.4 34
19 Hatayspor 38 17.8 37.7 -19.9 14
20 Adana Demirspor 38 11.0 60.4 -49.4 -57