Estadísticas / Fútbol / France. Ligue 2 / Montpellier vs Clermont Foot

Montpellier vs Clermont Foot Statistics & Analysis

Montpellier Montpellier
May 02, 2026 - 18:00
1 1.25
2 0.87
xG Accuracy: 68%
Clermont Foot Clermont Foot
Casa de apuestas premium 1xBet: los nuevos usuarios pueden usar el código promocional 1x_3342271. Registrarse

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the model’s highlighted side (or lean) to what happened at full time.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Más / Menos de 2.5 Menos de 2.5 Más de 2.5 (3 goals) ✖ Incorrect
  • Ambos Equipos Marcarán BTTS No Sí ✖ Incorrect
  • 1X2 Montpellier Clermont Foot ✖ Incorrect
  • Perspectivas de marcador exacto 1-0 1-2 ✖ Incorrect

Informe IA del partido

Resumen del partido IA

Pre-match snapshot for this fixture.

  • League: Ligue 2
  • Fixture: Montpellier vs Clermont Foot
  • Kickoff: 2026-05-02 18:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 43.5% · Draw 32.5% · Away 24.1%
  • xG (showing): Montpellier 1.25 — Clermont Foot 0.87 (total xG ≈ 2.12)
  • Primary / headline line (Betting Primary Pick when shown): Under 2.5 goals
  • Model: 64.4% · Implied: 50.5% · Probability edge: +13.9 pts · Est. EV: +24.9%
  • BTTS (model): Yes 43.1% · No 56.9%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-0 (15.0%)

Totals and BTTS are evaluated against current market prices where available.

Correct score remains high-variance even when a line is most likely on paper.

Mejor apuesta y razones

Primary pick from the decision engine: Under 2.5 goals.

If 1X2 looks tight, the engine may still find clearer structure in totals or BTTS — that is intentional.

When several markets sit near +EV, keep stakes small — correlation means edges do not add cleanly.

FAQ

What is the best-supported line in this snapshot?

Match the hero card above: if it says “Betting Primary Pick”, that leg cleared primary rules; if it says “Best +EV (tracked markets)”, it is the strongest +EV line that did not meet stricter Primary thresholds. The bullets below repeat the same model %, implied %, edge (pts), and EV % as that card.

Who has the edge in the match-winner market?

Use the 1X2 model percentages in the summary and the 1X2 market card: the side with the highest model % is the model lean, but check EV — a lean can still be -EV after prices.

Why might 1X2 look unattractive while totals do not?

Tight 1X2 prices often embed a fair three-way split, so EV on match-winner can sit negative even when Over/Under or BTTS still diverges from the model — compare the 1X2 row on the market cards to O/U and BTTS.

How should I read EV versus a probability gap?

Probability edge = model probability minus implied probability (reported here in percentage points). EV ≈ model probability × best tracked decimal odds − 1, shown as return per unit stake. They are related but not interchangeable labels.

Factores de riesgo

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Metodología

  • Inputs: Same structured facts bundle as the public prediction page (xG / Poisson snapshot, market EV where available, decision engine v2).
  • Narrative: Template sentence library with fixture-stable selection (no per-request LLM for this block).
  • Compliance: Educational framing only; not personalised advice.

Última actualización

May 01, 2026 (UTC)

¿Cómo usar esto?
  • Concéntrese en la línea principal cuando desee una idea viable.
  • No combine muchas púas de punta fina;Los bordes no se suman de manera confiable.
  • Trate las apuestas arriesgadas como jugadas opcionales y de alto riesgo únicamente.

Obtén predicciones premium para Montpellier & Clermont Foot!

Desbloquea análisis en profundidad, consejos de apuestas exclusivos y pronósticos de partidos con nuestro servicio de suscripción premium.

Suscríbete ahora
Volver a Estadísticas
Ligue 2 Ligue 2 — Clasificación
# EQUIPO PJ G E P Pts
1 Estac Troyes 34 20 7 7 67
2 Saint Etienne 34 18 6 10 60
3 Le Mans 33 15 14 4 59
4 RED Star FC 93 34 16 10 8 58
5 Rodez 34 15 13 6 58
6 Reims 34 14 14 6 56
7 Annecy 34 15 7 12 52
8 Montpellier 34 14 9 11 51
9 PAU 34 12 9 13 45
10 Dunkerque 34 11 10 13 43
11 Guingamp 34 10 10 14 40
12 Grenoble 34 8 15 11 39
13 Clermont Foot 34 9 10 15 37
14 Nancy 34 9 10 15 37
15 Boulogne 34 9 9 16 36
16 Laval 34 6 14 14 32
17 Bastia 33 5 13 15 28
18 Amiens 34 6 6 22 24
# EQUIPO PJ GF GC +/- Pts
1 Estac Troyes 34 60 33 +27 67
2 Saint Etienne 34 59 38 +21 60
3 Reims 34 53 35 +18 56
4 Dunkerque 34 53 45 +8 43
5 Annecy 34 49 39 +10 52
6 Le Mans 33 48 31 +17 59
7 PAU 34 48 62 -14 45
8 RED Star FC 93 34 45 37 +8 58
9 Rodez 34 45 39 +6 58
10 Guingamp 34 42 49 -7 40
11 Montpellier 34 41 31 +10 51
12 Clermont Foot 34 38 44 -6 37
13 Amiens 34 37 65 -28 24
14 Nancy 34 35 52 -17 37
15 Boulogne 34 34 49 -15 36
16 Grenoble 34 33 39 -6 39
17 Laval 34 30 48 -18 32
18 Bastia 33 23 37 -14 28
# EQUIPO PJ xG xGC +/- Pts
1 Estac Troyes 34 24.9 17.8 +7.1 67
2 PAU 34 24.1 17.0 +7.1 45
3 Reims 34 21.9 15.1 +6.8 56
4 Saint Etienne 34 22.9 18.3 +4.6 60
5 Le Mans 33 20.8 17.6 +3.2 59
6 Dunkerque 34 20.2 17.3 +2.9 43
7 Guingamp 34 21.2 19.1 +2.1 40
8 Boulogne 34 20.0 17.9 +2.1 36
9 Annecy 34 17.4 15.3 +2.1 52
10 RED Star FC 93 34 18.4 16.8 +1.6 58
11 Montpellier 34 21.5 20.0 +1.5 51
12 Nancy 34 19.7 20.1 -0.4 37
13 Bastia 33 16.6 18.1 -1.5 28
14 Grenoble 34 18.9 23.3 -4.4 39
15 Laval 34 14.8 19.7 -4.9 32
16 Rodez 34 20.2 27.6 -7.4 58
17 Clermont Foot 34 16.0 26.0 -10.0 37
18 Amiens 34 14.8 27.2 -12.4 24
Ligas Populares