市场 vs 公允价
公允估计可信度: 中
| 赛果 | 公允 | 市场 | 偏差 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lustenau | 33.33% | — | — |
| Draw | 30.46% | — | — |
| TSV St. Johann | 36.2% | — | — |
偏差 status: —
公允概率来自 Poisson/xG 统计模型,非博彩赔率,非投注建议。
决策生命周期
当前阶段: 等待收盘线
- 预测已生成
- 市场已对比
- 模型已验证
- 收盘已记录
- CLV 已评估
- 入场
- 待定
- 收盘
- 待定
- CLV
- 待定
最终投注结论
常规门槛下无默认下注 — 倾向仅供上下文参考。
- 1X2 无价值(TSV St. Johann vs. 当前赔率)
- 仅模型倾向(非默认下注):小于 2.5
- 仅模型倾向(非默认下注):BTTS 是
信心偏低(3.5/10)— 建议减小注额或跳过。
Login to see the full betting verdict
Sign in free to unlock the Final betting verdict — which markets pass, where +EV may exist, and steam warnings.
优质投注站1xbet:新手可使用优惠码1x_3342271,即可获得$100现金
1X2
❌ No bet — no value vs. current odds
No positive EV could be estimated on tracked lines at current best odds.
Over 2.5 45.1% · Under 2.5 54.9%
Value lean:
Under 2.5
TSV St. Johann · Model probability 36.2%
Yes 52.1% · No 47.9%
Value lean: BTTS Yes
Most Likely
1-1
Probability 12.9%
Correct score is high-variance — small stakes for fun only.
Betting decision (model vs. market EV)
Lean only (below +EV threshold) — The model leans a side in at least one market, but no tracked line reaches the engine’s minimum EV threshold for a default stake suggestion.
Total expected goals (xG sum) is in a borderline band — outcome variance is high. (ΣxG ≈ 2.48)
Decision strength: 3.5 / 10
- pred_conf_v1_max_1x2_under_50
- pred_conf_v1_draw_above_30
O/U 2.5: insufficient book odds for EV
BTTS: insufficient book odds for EV
BTTS: insufficient book odds for EV
OddsGPT Decision Engine v2.2.0
Continuously refined using model performance, market data and historical results.
Check Odds at 1xBet
How to use this
- Focus on the Primary line when you want one actionable idea.
- Do not parlay many thin-edge picks together; edges do not add reliably.
- Treat longshots as optional, high-stake-sizing plays only.
Explore More Predictions Content
Get Premium Predictions for Lustenau & TSV St. Johann!
Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.
Subscribe Now
Regionalliga - West — Standings
| # | TEAM | MP | W | D | L | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wacker Innsbruck | 30 | 26 | 2 | 2 | 80 |
| 2 | Kuchl | 30 | 20 | 2 | 8 | 62 |
| 3 | Seekirchen | 30 | 18 | 4 | 8 | 58 |
| 4 | Imst | 30 | 17 | 7 | 6 | 58 |
| 5 | Dornbirn | 31 | 16 | 4 | 11 | 52 |
| 6 | Bischofshofen | 30 | 16 | 3 | 11 | 51 |
| 7 | Hohenems | 31 | 11 | 11 | 9 | 44 |
| 8 | Schwaz | 31 | 13 | 5 | 13 | 44 |
| 9 | SVG Reichenau | 30 | 13 | 3 | 14 | 42 |
| 10 | Kitzbühel | 30 | 12 | 4 | 14 | 40 |
| 11 | Wals-Grünau | 30 | 10 | 8 | 12 | 38 |
| 12 | TSV St. Johann | 30 | 9 | 5 | 16 | 32 |
| 13 | Lustenau | 30 | 8 | 7 | 15 | 31 |
| 14 | Rheindorf Altach II | 30 | 7 | 6 | 17 | 27 |
| 15 | Pinzgau Saalfelden | 30 | 6 | 6 | 18 | 24 |
| 16 | Kufstein | 30 | 4 | 10 | 16 | 22 |
| 17 | Lauterach | 31 | 5 | 5 | 21 | 20 |
| # | TEAM | MP | GS | GC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wacker Innsbruck | 30 | 81 | 17 | +64 | 80 |
| 2 | Seekirchen | 30 | 78 | 45 | +33 | 58 |
| 3 | Imst | 30 | 66 | 37 | +29 | 58 |
| 4 | Dornbirn | 31 | 61 | 44 | +17 | 52 |
| 5 | Kuchl | 30 | 59 | 40 | +19 | 62 |
| 6 | Bischofshofen | 30 | 58 | 40 | +18 | 51 |
| 7 | Schwaz | 31 | 56 | 54 | +2 | 44 |
| 8 | Hohenems | 31 | 53 | 49 | +4 | 44 |
| 9 | Wals-Grünau | 30 | 51 | 60 | -9 | 38 |
| 10 | Lustenau | 30 | 45 | 73 | -28 | 31 |
| 11 | TSV St. Johann | 30 | 43 | 53 | -10 | 32 |
| 12 | Lauterach | 31 | 40 | 78 | -38 | 20 |
| 13 | SVG Reichenau | 30 | 39 | 52 | -13 | 42 |
| 14 | Kitzbühel | 30 | 37 | 41 | -4 | 40 |
| 15 | Rheindorf Altach II | 30 | 33 | 65 | -32 | 27 |
| 16 | Kufstein | 30 | 27 | 48 | -21 | 22 |
| 17 | Pinzgau Saalfelden | 30 | 24 | 55 | -31 | 24 |