Predictions / Football / Czech-Republic. 3. liga - CFL B / Neratovice-Byškovice vs Kolín

Neratovice-Byškovice vs Kolín Prediction, Odds & AI Betting Tips

Neratovice-Byškovice Neratovice-Byškovice
May 23, 2026 - 15:00
1.45
1.25
42% 26% 33%
Kolín Kolín

Final betting verdict

Different markets price efficiency differently — 1X2 can be a pass while goals markets still show edge.

  • No value on 1X2 (Neratovice-Byškovice vs. current odds)
  • Thin edge: Over 2.5 (+2.2% — below default sizing bar)
  • Possible value: BTTS No (+11.2% EV at best odds)
  • Steam repriced this match — late money may have eaten remaining edge on the steamed side.
Low conviction (4.5/10) — prefer smaller stakes or skip.
1X2 ❌ No bet on 1X2 — no value vs. current odds on this market
Match: 41.8% Neratovice-Byškovice; implied 57.2%; EV -21.3%
No standard primary for this match: the best +EV line in the 25–40% model band is not shown as a main pick (settings). Use the alternative or secondary lines below.
Steam vs. value
Market momentum is strong, but current odds may already be over-adjusted. Steam detected — model value on this line may be priced out.
This match appears on the market-movement board for aggressive line repricing — not because 1X2 is currently a positive-EV bet.
⚡ Sharp-led move · Draw ↓ -7.1% · 9/11 · 51 B
Market steam Detected
Current EV Negative
Closing line pressure Normal
Value remaining Limited
No Primary pick for default sizing on this strip (1X2 can still read “no bet”), but at least one other market clears the +EV threshold — check the Over/Under and BTTS cards below.
Why The model prices Kolín (1X2) about 11.2 percentage points above closing implied — the main structural read vs. the line.

Market intelligence

Supporting read on how the prioritized closing feed moved versus the model — use after the Primary pick above.

Market briefing

Market remained largely stable before kickoff. No meaningful late implied-price shift was detected between PRE30 and PRE5 on the prioritized bookmaker snapshot.

Despite limited late movement, the model still prices Draw (1X2), Kolín (1X2) meaningfully above what those closing snapshots implied — that gap is a static “model vs. price” read, not a late steam or chase story.

The model still exceeds closing implied on Kolín (1X2) by about 11.2 percentage points — the clearest mispricing signal summarized on this page.

Model vs. closing implied

Market Model % Closing impl. % Gap (pp)
Neratovice-Byškovice (1X2) 41.8 57.2 -15.4
Draw (1X2) 25.7 21.4 +4.3
Kolín (1X2) 32.6 21.4 +11.2
Over 2.5 goals 65.1 64.5 +0.6
Under 2.5 goals 34.9 35.5 -0.6
What this means

In plain terms: the model lands near 32.6% on Kolín (1X2), while the closing snapshot implied about 21.4%. The difference — about 11.2 percentage points — is the largest model-vs.-market gap highlighted on this page.

Quick definitions: “closing implied” is the probability for that outcome implied by the final captured odds (after a simple de-vig). “Gap (pp)” is the model percentage minus that implied value, in percentage points (pp).

Closing-window line move

Single prioritized bookmaker per snapshot (not all books). Capture path: PRE30 → PRE5 · Book: Bet365

Column tags in parentheses: Closing uses the first available snapshot in PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Early uses the first available in PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 that is not the same capture as Closing.

Detailed capture odds are folded below — movement was negligible on de-vig implied prices.

View full line-by-line capture table
Market Early (PRE30) Closing (PRE5) Implied Δ (pp)
Neratovice-Byškovice (1X2) 1.57 1.57 0.0
Draw (1X2) 4.2 4.2 0.0
Kolín (1X2) 4.2 4.2 0.0
Over 2.5 goals 1.44 1.44 0.0
Under 2.5 goals 2.62 2.62 0.0
⭐ Both Teams To Score Model edge (+EV)
Yes 50.6% · No 49.4%
EV Yes -17.5% · EV No +11.2%
Value lean: BTTS No
Over / Under 2.5 Lean
Over 2.5 65.1% · Under 2.5 34.9%
EV Over +2.2% · EV Under -16.2%
Value lean: Over 2.5
1X2 Poor value
Neratovice-Byškovice · Model 41.8%
implied 57.2%
Main consensus market · EV: -21.3%
Best available bookmaker line: -2.4% EV
Some outlier bookmaker prices may still show small theoretical value vs. the consensus line above.
Correct Score Insights Longshot / fun
Most Likely
1-1
Probability 9.8%
Correct score is high-variance — small stakes for fun only.
Betting decision (model vs. market EV)
Selective value — At least one tracked market may clear +EV at best odds, but conviction is limited (4.5/10) — size down.
Decision strength: 4.5 / 10
  • Max 1X2 prob under 50% (no dominant 1X2) (−1.0)
  • Two or more valid +EV lines at threshold (+0.5)
O/U 2.5: EV Over +2.2% · EV Under -16.2% (8 book pairs)
BTTS: EV Yes -17.5% · EV No +11.2%
Should you bet on this match? Only where +EV is shown; always compare with your own limits.
OddsGPT Decision Engine v2.1.0(EV + Market Structure + Risk Adjustment) Check Odds at 1xBet

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Quick read on how the model reads this matchup.

  • League: 3. liga - CFL B
  • Fixture: Neratovice-Byškovice vs Kolín
  • Kickoff: 2026-05-23 15:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 41.8% · Draw 25.7% · Away 32.6%
  • xG (showing): Neratovice-Byškovice 1.45 — Kolín 1.25 (total xG ≈ 2.7)
  • Value headline: At least one tracked line reaches the headline EV threshold — align with the hero / Primary card if shown.
  • Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Over 2.5 (Under 2.5 34.9% · Over 2.5 65.1%); BTTS No (Yes 50.6% · No 49.4%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Over 2.5; BTTS No
  • BTTS (model): Yes 50.6% · No 49.4%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (9.8%)

When book depth is thin or odds are missing, EV may be unavailable even though the model still prefers one side on totals or BTTS — wait for cleaner prices or skip.

If lines move materially, re-run generation or refresh — implied probabilities and any future EV readouts will change first.

Best Bet + Reason

No clear +EV headline on this snapshot.

Treat this page as a read-only diagnostic: totals/BTTS structure can be informative even when the honest answer is to wait.

Re-check after material price moves; edges appear and disappear with liquidity.

FAQ

Should I still read the 1X2 card?

Yes — it shows whether any winner price clears value. Here it often explains why there is no headline: probabilities can be clustered while prices already embed that uncertainty.

Is the most likely correct score still relevant?

As context only: it is still a low absolute probability tail outcome (often in the single digits, sometimes low teens). It does not override the “no headline +EV” stance — treat score bets as fun-sized if you play them at all.

Why is there no “best bet” on this page?

The headline engine uses a minimum +EV threshold (e.g. 2%) for a default pick. A line can still show tiny +EV that fails that bar — we still call it no default bet so readers do not over-size thin edges.

What do the grey “lean” labels mean then?

They summarise where the model tilts (e.g. Under 2.5 or BTTS No) without claiming a positive economic edge. Use them as context; size to zero unless you deliberately accept discretionary risk.

Risk Factors

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Methodology

  • Inputs: Same structured facts bundle as the public prediction page (xG / Poisson snapshot, market EV where available, decision engine v2).
  • Compliance: Educational framing only; not personalised advice.

Last Updated

May 24, 2026 (UTC)

How to use this
  • When there is no Primary line, compare the +EV rows in the market cards below (not only 1X2).
  • Do not parlay many thin-edge picks together; edges do not add reliably.
  • Treat longshots as optional, high-stake-sizing plays only.

Get Premium Predictions for Neratovice-Byškovice & Kolín!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Predictions
3. liga - CFL B 3. liga - CFL B — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Kladno 30 21 5 4 68
2 Jiskra Domažlice 29 19 3 7 60
3 Viktoria Plzeň II 29 17 7 5 58
4 Písek 29 13 7 9 46
5 Aritma Praha 31 11 11 9 44
6 Králův Dvůr 30 13 4 13 43
7 Loko Vltavín 30 13 4 13 43
8 Admira Praha 29 12 6 11 42
9 Slavia III 29 12 5 12 41
10 České Budějovice II 29 10 10 9 40
11 Příbram II 30 12 2 16 38
12 Dukla Praha II 29 11 4 14 37
13 Bohemians 1905 II 29 9 8 12 35
14 Motorlet Praha 29 8 8 13 32
15 Sokol Hostouň 29 7 10 12 31
16 Petřín Plzeň 29 7 4 18 25
17 Táborsko II 30 4 4 22 16
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Kladno 30 81 25 +56 68
2 Viktoria Plzeň II 29 70 46 +24 58
3 Jiskra Domažlice 29 69 39 +30 60
4 České Budějovice II 29 54 52 +2 40
5 Bohemians 1905 II 29 53 52 +1 35
6 Králův Dvůr 30 53 54 -1 43
7 Slavia III 29 50 45 +5 41
8 Dukla Praha II 29 45 49 -4 37
9 Písek 29 43 34 +9 46
10 Aritma Praha 31 43 43 0 44
11 Příbram II 30 43 54 -11 38
12 Admira Praha 29 39 43 -4 42
13 Petřín Plzeň 29 34 67 -33 25
14 Loko Vltavín 30 33 39 -6 43
15 Motorlet Praha 29 31 42 -11 32
16 Sokol Hostouň 29 28 41 -13 31
17 Táborsko II 30 25 69 -44 16
3. liga - CFL B Czech-Republic. 3. liga - CFL B Predictions
Popular Leagues