Predictions / Football / Hungary. NB III - Southeast / Gyulai Termál vs Dabas

Gyulai Termál vs Dabas Prediction, Odds & AI Betting Tips

Gyulai Termál Gyulai Termál
May 24, 2026 - 15:00
1.45
1.25
42% 26% 33%
Dabas Dabas

Final betting verdict

Different markets price efficiency differently — 1X2 can be a pass while goals markets still show edge.

  • No value on 1X2 (Gyulai Termál vs. current odds)
  • Possible value: Under 2.5 (+14.0% EV at best odds)
  • Possible value: BTTS Yes (+25%+ EV at best odds)
  • Steam repriced this match — late money may have eaten remaining edge on the steamed side.
Low conviction (4.5/10) — prefer smaller stakes or skip.
1X2 ❌ No bet on 1X2 — no value vs. current odds on this market
Match: 41.8% Gyulai Termál; implied 63.3%; EV -23.6%
No standard primary for this match: the best +EV line in the 25–40% model band is not shown as a main pick (settings). Use the alternative or secondary lines below.
Steam vs. value
Market momentum is strong, but current odds may already be over-adjusted. Steam detected — model value on this line may be priced out.
This match appears on the market-movement board for aggressive line repricing — not because 1X2 is currently a positive-EV bet.
📈 Steam · Dabas ↓ -8.0% · 4/8 · 47 B
Market steam Moderate
Current EV Negative
Closing line pressure Normal
Value remaining Limited
No Primary pick for default sizing on this strip (1X2 can still read “no bet”), but at least one other market clears the +EV threshold — check the Over/Under and BTTS cards below.
Why The model prices Dabas (1X2) about 16.8 percentage points above closing implied — the main structural read vs. the line.

Market intelligence

Supporting read on how the prioritized closing feed moved versus the model — use after the Primary pick above.

Market briefing

Market remained largely stable before kickoff. No meaningful late implied-price shift was detected between PRE30 and PRE1 on the prioritized bookmaker snapshot.

Despite limited late movement, the model still prices Draw (1X2), Dabas (1X2), Over 2.5 goals meaningfully above what those closing snapshots implied — that gap is a static “model vs. price” read, not a late steam or chase story.

The model still exceeds closing implied on Dabas (1X2) by about 16.8 percentage points — the clearest mispricing signal summarized on this page.

Model vs. closing implied

Market Model % Closing impl. % Gap (pp)
Gyulai Termál (1X2) 41.8 63.3 -21.5
Draw (1X2) 25.7 20.9 +4.8
Dabas (1X2) 32.6 15.8 +16.8
Over 2.5 goals 62.0 59.5 +2.5
Under 2.5 goals 38.0 40.5 -2.5
What this means

In plain terms: the model lands near 32.6% on Dabas (1X2), while the closing snapshot implied about 15.8%. The difference — about 16.8 percentage points — is the largest model-vs.-market gap highlighted on this page.

Quick definitions: “closing implied” is the probability for that outcome implied by the final captured odds (after a simple de-vig). “Gap (pp)” is the model percentage minus that implied value, in percentage points (pp).

Closing-window line move

Single prioritized bookmaker per snapshot (not all books). Capture path: PRE30 → PRE1 · Book: Pinnacle

Column tags in parentheses: Closing uses the first available snapshot in PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Early uses the first available in PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 that is not the same capture as Closing.

Detailed capture odds are folded below — movement was negligible on de-vig implied prices.

View full line-by-line capture table
Market Early (PRE30) Closing (PRE1) Implied Δ (pp)
Gyulai Termál (1X2) 1.4 1.4 0.0
Draw (1X2) 4.24 4.24 0.0
Dabas (1X2) 5.61 5.61 0.0
Over 2.5 goals 1.53 1.53 0.0
Under 2.5 goals 2.25 2.25 0.0
⭐ Both Teams To Score Model edge (+EV)
Yes 86.6% · No 13.4%
EV Yes +25%+ · EV No -73.2%
Value lean: BTTS Yes
Over / Under 2.5 Model edge (+EV)
Over 2.5 62.0% · Under 2.5 38.0%
EV Over -5.1% · EV Under +14.0%
Value lean: Under 2.5
1X2 Lean
Gyulai Termál · Model 41.8%
implied 63.3%
Main consensus market · EV: -23.6%
Best available bookmaker line: +2.7% EV
Some outlier bookmaker prices may still show small theoretical value vs. the consensus line above.
Correct Score Insights Longshot / fun
Most Likely
1-1
Probability 9.8%
Correct score is high-variance — small stakes for fun only.
Betting decision (model vs. market EV)
Selective value — At least one tracked market may clear +EV at best odds, but conviction is limited (4.5/10) — size down.
Decision strength: 4.5 / 10
  • Max 1X2 prob under 50% (no dominant 1X2) (−1.0)
  • Two or more valid +EV lines at threshold (+0.5)
O/U 2.5: EV Over -5.1% · EV Under +14.0% (6 book pairs)
BTTS: EV Yes +25%+ · EV No -73.2%
Should you bet on this match? Only where +EV is shown; always compare with your own limits.
OddsGPT Decision Engine v2.1.0(EV + Market Structure + Risk Adjustment) Check Odds at 1xBet

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Pre-match snapshot for this fixture.

  • League: NB III - Southeast
  • Fixture: Gyulai Termál vs Dabas
  • Kickoff: 2026-05-24 15:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 41.8% · Draw 25.7% · Away 32.6%
  • xG (showing): Gyulai Termál 1.45 — Dabas 1.25 (total xG ≈ 2.7)
  • Value headline: At least one tracked line reaches the headline EV threshold — align with the hero / Primary card if shown.
  • Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 38.0% · Over 2.5 62.0%); BTTS Yes (Yes 86.6% · No 13.4%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS Yes
  • BTTS (model): Yes 86.6% · No 13.4%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (9.8%)

Saying “no value” on a snapshot is a feature, not a bug: it protects readers from forcing a play when the edge is not there.

Most likely correct score stays a low-probability tail: use it for context, not as a must-bet story.

Best Bet + Reason

No bankroll-sized bet is implied here.

The cards may still show value leans (e.g. a preferred Under or a BTTS side) where prices are inefficient or incomplete — that is not the same as a positive-EV ticket at the configured threshold.

Re-check after material price moves; edges appear and disappear with liquidity.

FAQ

Why is there no “best bet” on this page?

The headline engine uses a minimum +EV threshold (e.g. 2%) for a default pick. A line can still show tiny +EV that fails that bar — we still call it no default bet so readers do not over-size thin edges.

Is the most likely correct score still relevant?

As context only: it is still a low absolute probability tail outcome (often in the single digits, sometimes low teens). It does not override the “no headline +EV” stance — treat score bets as fun-sized if you play them at all.

Should I still read the 1X2 card?

Yes — it shows whether any winner price clears value. Here it often explains why there is no headline: probabilities can be clustered while prices already embed that uncertainty.

What do the grey “lean” labels mean then?

They summarise where the model tilts (e.g. Under 2.5 or BTTS No) without claiming a positive economic edge. Use them as context; size to zero unless you deliberately accept discretionary risk.

Risk Factors

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Methodology

  • Inputs: Same structured facts bundle as the public prediction page (xG / Poisson snapshot, market EV where available, decision engine v2).
  • Compliance: Educational framing only; not personalised advice.

Last Updated

May 24, 2026 (UTC)

How to use this
  • When there is no Primary line, compare the +EV rows in the market cards below (not only 1X2).
  • Do not parlay many thin-edge picks together; edges do not add reliably.
  • Treat longshots as optional, high-stake-sizing plays only.

Get Premium Predictions for Gyulai Termál & Dabas!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Predictions
NB III - Southeast NB III - Southeast — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Monori Se 29 20 7 2 67
2 ESMTK 29 20 3 6 63
3 Gyulai Termál 29 19 5 5 62
4 III. Kerületi TUE 29 17 7 5 58
5 Vasas II 30 14 11 5 53
6 Csep-Gól 29 14 4 11 46
7 Dabas 29 12 6 11 42
8 Honvéd II 29 11 9 9 42
9 Dunaharaszti MTK 29 11 6 12 39
10 Hódmezővásárhely 29 10 7 12 37
11 Szegedi VSE 29 9 5 15 32
12 BKV Előre 29 8 5 16 29
13 Szeged-Csanád II 29 7 8 14 29
14 Békéscsaba II 29 7 4 18 25
15 Martfűi LSE 30 6 2 22 20
16 Tiszaföldvár 29 3 1 25 10
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Gyulai Termál 29 77 24 +53 62
2 III. Kerületi TUE 29 65 35 +30 58
3 Vasas II 30 65 40 +25 53
4 ESMTK 29 62 24 +38 63
5 Monori Se 29 62 29 +33 67
6 BKV Előre 29 48 63 -15 29
7 Dabas 29 47 39 +8 42
8 Csep-Gól 29 47 40 +7 46
9 Dunaharaszti MTK 29 46 50 -4 39
10 Hódmezővásárhely 29 45 50 -5 37
11 Szegedi VSE 29 44 60 -16 32
12 Honvéd II 29 39 36 +3 42
13 Szeged-Csanád II 29 35 50 -15 29
14 Békéscsaba II 29 30 61 -31 25
15 Martfűi LSE 30 26 75 -49 20
16 Tiszaföldvár 29 25 87 -62 10
Popular Leagues