Predictions / Football / Poland. Ekstraklasa / Gornik Zabrze vs Radomiak Radom

Gornik Zabrze vs Radomiak Radom Prediction, Odds & AI Betting Tips

Gornik Zabrze Gornik Zabrze
May 23, 2026 - 16:00
1.28
0.81
46% 32% 22%
Radomiak Radom Radomiak Radom
1X2 ❌ No bet — no value vs. current odds
Match: 45.8% Gornik Zabrze; implied 64.4%; EV -17.2%
No standard primary for this match: the best +EV line in the 25–40% model band is not shown as a main pick (settings). Use the alternative or secondary lines below.
Steam vs. value
Market momentum is strong, but current odds may already be over-adjusted. Steam detected — model value on this line may be priced out.
This match appears on the market-movement board for aggressive line repricing — not because 1X2 is currently a positive-EV bet.
⚡ Sharp-led move · Radomiak Radom ↓ -11.5% · 5/14 · 47 B
Market steam Detected
Current EV Negative
Closing line pressure Normal
Value remaining Limited
No Primary pick for default sizing on this strip (1X2 can still read “no bet”), but at least one other market clears the +EV threshold — check the Over/Under and BTTS cards below.
Why The model prices Under 2.5 goals about 26.1 percentage points above closing implied — the main structural read vs. the line.

Market intelligence

Supporting read on how the prioritized closing feed moved versus the model — use after the Primary pick above.

Market briefing

Market remained largely stable before kickoff. No meaningful late implied-price shift was detected between PRE30 and PRE1 on the prioritized bookmaker snapshot.

Despite limited late movement, the model still prices Draw (1X2), Radomiak Radom (1X2), Under 2.5 goals meaningfully above what those closing snapshots implied — that gap is a static “model vs. price” read, not a late steam or chase story.

The model still exceeds closing implied on Under 2.5 goals by about 26.1 percentage points — the clearest mispricing signal summarized on this page.

Model vs. closing implied

Market Model % Closing impl. % Gap (pp)
Gornik Zabrze (1X2) 45.8 64.4 -18.5
Draw (1X2) 32.2 19.8 +12.5
Radomiak Radom (1X2) 21.9 15.8 +6.1
Over 2.5 goals 34.8 60.9 -26.1
Under 2.5 goals 65.2 39.1 +26.1
What this means

In plain terms: the model lands near 65.2% on Under 2.5 goals, while the closing snapshot implied about 39.1%. The difference — about 26.1 percentage points — is the largest model-vs.-market gap highlighted on this page.

Quick definitions: “closing implied” is the probability for that outcome implied by the final captured odds (after a simple de-vig). “Gap (pp)” is the model percentage minus that implied value, in percentage points (pp).

Closing-window line move

Single prioritized bookmaker per snapshot (not all books). Capture path: PRE30 → PRE1 · Book: Pinnacle

Column tags in parentheses: Closing uses the first available snapshot in PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Early uses the first available in PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 that is not the same capture as Closing.

Detailed capture odds are folded below — movement was negligible on de-vig implied prices.

View full line-by-line capture table
Market Early (PRE30) Closing (PRE1) Implied Δ (pp)
Gornik Zabrze (1X2) 1.47 1.47 0.0
Draw (1X2) 4.79 4.79 0.0
Radomiak Radom (1X2) 5.97 5.97 0.0
Over 2.5 goals 1.56 1.56 0.0
Under 2.5 goals 2.43 2.43 0.0
⭐ Over / Under 2.5 Best value (+EV)
Over 2.5 34.8% · Under 2.5 65.2%
EV Over -44.32% · EV Under 58.44%
Value lean: Under 2.5
Both Teams To Score Best value (+EV)
Yes 41.8% · No 58.2%
EV Yes -26.85% · EV No 22.22%
Value lean: BTTS No
1X2 Lean
Gornik Zabrze · Model 45.8%
implied 64.4%
Main consensus market · EV: -17.2%
Best available bookmaker line: +4.4% EV
Some outlier bookmaker prices may still show small theoretical value vs. the consensus line above.
Correct Score Insights Longshot / fun
Most Likely
1-0
Probability 15.8%
Correct score is high-variance — small stakes for fun only.
Betting decision (model vs. market EV)
Value opportunity — At least one market shows estimated +EV at current best decimal odds (threshold: 2.0%).
Decision strength: 4.0 / 10
  • Max 1X2 prob under 50% (no dominant 1X2) (−1.0)
  • Draw probability above 30% (−0.5)
  • Two or more valid +EV lines at threshold (+0.5)
O/U 2.5: EV Over -44.32% · EV Under 58.44% (11 book pairs)
BTTS: EV Yes -26.85% · EV No 22.22%
Should you bet on this match? Only where +EV is shown; always compare with your own limits.
OddsGPT Decision Engine v2.1.0(EV + Market Structure + Risk Adjustment) Check Odds at 1xBet

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Below is a compact, numbers-first snapshot aligned with the same engine as the cards above.

  • League: Ekstraklasa
  • Fixture: Gornik Zabrze vs Radomiak Radom
  • Kickoff: 2026-05-23 16:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 45.8% · Draw 32.2% · Away 21.9%
  • xG (showing): Gornik Zabrze 1.28 — Radomiak Radom 0.81 (total xG ≈ 2.09)
  • Value headline: At least one tracked line reaches the headline EV threshold — align with the hero / Primary card if shown.
  • Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 65.2% · Over 2.5 34.8%); BTTS No (Yes 41.8% · No 58.2%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS No
  • BTTS (model): Yes 41.8% · No 58.2%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-0 (15.8%)

The decision block shows no default bet: no tracked line clears the headline minimum +EV threshold at the best prices we have (a leg can still show small +EV below that bar). Lean labels are directional only — not bankroll-sized recommendations.

If lines move materially, re-run generation or refresh — implied probabilities and any future EV readouts will change first.

Best Bet + Reason

Skip unless odds move — the engine sees no line clearing the +EV gate.

Treat this page as a read-only diagnostic: totals/BTTS structure can be informative even when the honest answer is to wait.

Re-check after material price moves; edges appear and disappear with liquidity.

FAQ

Is the most likely correct score still relevant?

As context only: it is still a low absolute probability tail outcome (often in the single digits, sometimes low teens). It does not override the “no headline +EV” stance — treat score bets as fun-sized if you play them at all.

Should I still read the 1X2 card?

Yes — it shows whether any winner price clears value. Here it often explains why there is no headline: probabilities can be clustered while prices already embed that uncertainty.

Why is there no “best bet” on this page?

The headline engine uses a minimum +EV threshold (e.g. 2%) for a default pick. A line can still show tiny +EV that fails that bar — we still call it no default bet so readers do not over-size thin edges.

What do the grey “lean” labels mean then?

They summarise where the model tilts (e.g. Under 2.5 or BTTS No) without claiming a positive economic edge. Use them as context; size to zero unless you deliberately accept discretionary risk.

Risk Factors

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Methodology

  • Inputs: Same structured facts bundle as the public prediction page (xG / Poisson snapshot, market EV where available, decision engine v2).
  • Compliance: Educational framing only; not personalised advice.

Last Updated

May 24, 2026 (UTC)

How to use this
  • When there is no Primary line, compare the +EV rows in the market cards below (not only 1X2).
  • Do not parlay many thin-edge picks together; edges do not add reliably.
  • Treat longshots as optional, high-stake-sizing plays only.

Get Premium Predictions for Gornik Zabrze & Radomiak Radom!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Predictions
Ekstraklasa Ekstraklasa — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Lech Poznan 34 16 12 6 60
2 Gornik Zabrze 34 16 8 10 56
3 Jagiellonia 34 15 11 8 56
4 Raków Częstochowa 34 16 7 11 55
5 GKS Katowice 34 14 8 12 50
6 Legia Warszawa 34 12 13 9 49
7 Zaglebie Lubin 34 13 9 12 48
8 Wisla Plock 34 12 10 12 46
9 Pogon Szczecin 34 13 6 15 45
10 Radomiak Radom 34 11 11 12 44
11 Korona Kielce 34 11 10 13 43
12 Motor Lublin 34 10 13 11 43
13 Cracovia Krakow 34 9 15 10 42
14 Widzew Łódź 34 12 6 16 42
15 Piast Gliwice 34 11 8 15 41
16 Lechia Gdansk 34 12 7 15 38
17 Arka Gdynia 34 9 9 16 36
18 Nieciecza 34 9 7 18 34
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Lech Poznan 34 62 45 +17 60
2 Lechia Gdansk 34 62 65 -3 38
3 Jagiellonia 34 56 41 +15 56
4 Radomiak Radom 34 52 53 -1 44
5 Raków Częstochowa 34 51 40 +11 55
6 GKS Katowice 34 51 45 +6 50
7 Gornik Zabrze 34 50 38 +12 56
8 Pogon Szczecin 34 47 49 -2 45
9 Motor Lublin 34 46 53 -7 43
10 Zaglebie Lubin 34 45 38 +7 48
11 Nieciecza 34 43 65 -22 34
12 Legia Warszawa 34 42 37 +5 49
13 Piast Gliwice 34 42 46 -4 41
14 Widzew Łódź 34 41 41 0 42
15 Korona Kielce 34 40 40 0 43
16 Cracovia Krakow 34 39 42 -3 42
17 Wisla Plock 34 34 38 -4 46
18 Arka Gdynia 34 34 61 -27 36
# TEAM MP xG xGC +/- PTS
1 Lech Poznan 34 59.8 34.6 +25.2 60
2 Legia Warszawa 34 44.3 34.9 +9.4 49
3 Raków Częstochowa 34 52.1 43.1 +9.0 55
4 Piast Gliwice 34 45.4 40.2 +5.2 41
5 Lechia Gdansk 34 48.3 43.9 +4.4 38
6 Pogon Szczecin 34 52.4 48.2 +4.2 45
7 Gornik Zabrze 34 41.5 39.4 +2.1 56
8 Cracovia Krakow 34 38.1 36.2 +1.9 42
9 Widzew Łódź 34 38.2 37.2 +1.0 42
10 Korona Kielce 34 49.6 49.8 -0.2 43
11 Radomiak Radom 34 42.0 43.8 -1.8 44
12 Wisla Plock 34 41.6 44.2 -2.6 46
13 GKS Katowice 34 41.1 45.5 -4.4 50
14 Jagiellonia 34 42.4 48.3 -5.9 56
15 Zaglebie Lubin 34 33.5 42.8 -9.3 48
16 Nieciecza 34 42.4 54.9 -12.5 34
17 Motor Lublin 34 39.5 52.2 -12.7 43
18 Arka Gdynia 34 36.0 49.1 -13.1 36
Popular Leagues