Thống kê / Bóng đá / Argentina. Liga Profesional Argentina / Central Córdoba vs Instituto Córdoba

Central Córdoba vs Instituto Córdoba Statistics & Analysis

Aug 16, 2026 - 23:15
0 0.73
1 1.55
xG Accuracy: 70%
Nhà cái cao cấp stake: người mới có thể dùng mã khuyến mãi FHn2uDc1. Đăng ký ngay

Thị trường được theo dõi so với kết quả toàn thời gian

Mỗi hàng so sánh mô hình trước trận đấu với kết quả toàn thời gian.

  • Chợ Dự đoán Kết quả kết quả
  • Tài / Xỉu 2.5 Xỉu 2.5 Xỉu 2.5 (1 mục tiêu) ✔ Chính xác
  • Cả Hai Đội Đều Ghi Bàn BTTS Không Không ✔ Chính xác
  • 1X2 Instituto Córdoba Instituto Córdoba ✔ Chính xác
  • Thông tin tỷ số chính xác 0-1, 0-2, 1-1, 0-0, 1-2 0-1 ✔ Chính xác

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Aug 11, 2026 · 07:00 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-3646372

Closing Odds 2.23
AI Fair Odds —
CLV +0.0%
Final Result Instituto Córdoba win · Central Córdoba 0–1 Instituto Córdoba
Prediction ✔ Correct
Decision Grade A

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Thông tin thị trường

Đọc bổ sung sau lựa chọn chính: feed đóng kèo ưu tiên đã thay đổi so với mô hình thế nào.

Tóm tắt thị trường

Thị trường khá ổn định trước giờ bóng lăn. Không thấy dịch chuyển implied đáng kể giữa PRE30 và PRE1 trên snapshot ưu tiên.

Dù biến động muộn hạn chế, mô hình vẫn định giá Instituto Córdoba (1X2),Trên 2,5 bàn cao hơn rõ rệt so với implied từ các snapshot đóng kèo — đây là bức tranh tĩnh «mô hình so với giá», không phải câu chuyện đuổi dòng muộn.

Mô hình vẫn cao hơn implied đóng kèo ở Instituto Córdoba (1X2) khoảng 12.2 điểm phần trăm — tín hiệu lệch giá rõ nhất trên trang này.

Mô hình so với xác suất ngầm lúc đóng kèo

Thị trường Mô hình % Ngầm đóng kèo % Chênh (pp)
Central Córdoba (1X2) 16.0 24.7 -8.6
Vẽ tranh (1X2) 28.5 32.0 -3.5
Instituto Córdoba (1X2) 55.5 43.3 +12.2
Trên 2,5 bàn 39.9 34.4 +5.5
Dưới 2,5 bàn 60.1 65.6 -5.5
Ý nghĩa đơn giản

Nói dễ hiểu: mô hình khoảng 55.5% cho Instituto Córdoba (1X2), trong khi snapshot đóng kèo ngầm khoảng 43.3%. Chênh lệch — khoảng 12.2 điểm phần trăm — là khoảng cách mô hình–thị trường lớn nhất được nhấn mạnh trên trang này.

Giải thích nhanh: «ngầm đóng kèo» là xác suất suy ra từ kèo chụp cuối (sau khi bỏ vig đơn giản). «Chênh (pp)» = % mô hình trừ % ngầm đó, tính theo điểm phần trăm (pp).

Biến động kèo trước giờ bóng lăn

Một nhà cái ưu tiên mỗi snapshot (không phải toàn thị trường). Đường dẫn chụp: PRE30 → PRE1 · Nhà cái: Pinnacle

Trong ngoặc trên cột: Closing = snapshot đầu tiên khả dụng theo PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Early = snapshot đầu tiên trong PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 khác Closing.

Kèo chi tiết được gấp bên dưới — biến động implied (đã bỏ vig) không đáng kể.

Xem bảng đầy đủ từng dòng
Thị trường Sớm (PRE30) Sát giờ (PRE1) Δ ngầm (pp)
Central Córdoba (1X2) 3.92 3.92 0.0
Vẽ tranh (1X2) 3.02 3.02 0.0
Instituto Córdoba (1X2) 2.23 2.23 0.0
Trên 2,5 bàn 2.8 2.8 0.0
Dưới 2,5 bàn 1.47 1.47 0.0

Chưa có briefing AI cho trận này. Sau khi nâng cấp máy chủ, chạy lại «Tạo tỷ lệ hàng loạt» để tạo bản tóm tắt.

View technical JSON
{
  "bundle_version": 1,
  "content_hash": "20ed639315bdfc7ade4bae4250ddbef8af7aa917ad4959629a259c381356482c",
  "decision_algo_version": "2.5.0",
  "facts": {
    "ai_fp": {
      "away_predicted_xg": 1.55,
      "away_win_prob": 0.5545,
      "away_win_prob_posterior": null,
      "bayes_applied": 0,
      "btts_no_prob": 0.577,
      "btts_yes_prob": 0.423,
      "dc_rho": -0.13,
      "draw_prob": 0.2853,
      "draw_prob_posterior": null,
      "fair_odds_away": 1.8,
      "fair_odds_away_posterior": null,
      "fair_odds_draw": 3.51,
      "fair_odds_draw_posterior": null,
      "fair_odds_home": 6.24,
      "fair_odds_home_posterior": null,
      "home_predicted_xg": 0.73,
      "home_win_prob": 0.1602,
      "home_win_prob_posterior": null,
      "over_25_prob": 0.399,
      "prediction_confidence": "high",
      "under_25_prob": 0.601
    },
    "api_prediction": {
      "advice": "Combo Double chance : draw or Instituto C\u00f3rdoba and -3.5 goals",
      "main_pick_display": "Winner : Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
      "percent_away": "45%",
      "percent_draw": "45%",
      "percent_home": "10%",
      "winner_name": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba"
    },
    "away_xg": 1.55,
    "betting_insight": {
      "bet_label": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
      "confidence": 55.5,
      "main_pick_meta": {
        "confidence": "high",
        "display_text": "Winner : Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
        "edge": 0.1218,
        "edge_gap": 0.2705,
        "market": "1X2",
        "market_prob": 0.4334,
        "model_prob": 0.5552,
        "pick_type": "winner",
        "probabilities": {
          "away": 55.5,
          "draw": 28.5,
          "home": 16.0
        },
        "reason": "",
        "selection": "away",
        "selection_name": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba"
      },
      "market_comparison": [
        {
          "affi_link": "",
          "bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
          "odd": 2.23
        }
      ],
      "risk_color": "#f44336",
      "risk_key": "high_risk",
      "stacked_market": null,
      "value_bet": {
        "best_odds": 2.23,
        "bookmaker_id": 0,
        "bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
        "display_market": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba Win",
        "is_value": true,
        "label": "Away",
        "market_fair_odds": 2.31,
        "market_odds": 2.23,
        "model_odds": 1.8,
        "overround": 3.5,
        "prob_edge": 10.7,
        "value_pct": 23.9,
        "value_rating": "strong_value"
      }
    },
    "betting_markets": {
      "btts": {
        "away_clean_sheet": 6,
        "away_failed_to_score": 6,
        "away_played": 20,
        "away_score_rate": 78.8,
        "home_clean_sheet": 7,
        "home_failed_to_score": 11,
        "home_played": 19,
        "home_score_rate": 51.8,
        "no_prob": 57.7,
        "pick": "No",
        "pick_prob": 57.7,
        "source": "xG_dc",
        "strong_pick": false,
        "yes_prob": 42.3
      },
      "correct_score": {
        "away_expected": 1.55,
        "home_expected": 0.73,
        "scores": [
          {
            "away": 1,
            "home": 0,
            "label": "0-1",
            "prob": 15.9
          },
          {
            "away": 2,
            "home": 0,
            "label": "0-2",
            "prob": 12.3
          },
          {
            "away": 1,
            "home": 1,
            "label": "1-1",
            "prob": 11.6
          },
          {
            "away": 0,
            "home": 0,
            "label": "0-0",
            "prob": 10.2
          },
          {
            "away": 2,
            "home": 1,
            "label": "1-2",
            "prob": 9.0
          }
        ],
        "source": "xG"
      },
      "double_chance": {
        "options": [
          {
            "key": "1X",
            "label": "Central C\u00f3rdoba or Draw",
            "prob": 44.5
          },
          {
            "key": "12",
            "label": "Central C\u00f3rdoba or Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
            "prob": 71.5
          },
          {
            "key": "X2",
            "label": "Draw or Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
            "prob": 84.0
          }
        ],
        "pick_key": "X2",
        "pick_label": "Draw or Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
        "pick_prob": 84.0
      },
      "match_winner": {
        "away_pct": 55.5,
        "draw_pct": 28.5,
        "home_pct": 16.0,
        "lean_key": "away",
        "lean_label": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba"
      },
      "over_under": {
        "api_hint": "-3.5",
        "avg_total": 2.28,
        "away_avg_scored": 1.1,
        "confidence": "medium",
        "home_avg_scored": 0.6,
        "over_prob": 39.9,
        "pick": "Under 2.5",
        "pick_prob": 60.1,
        "source": "xG_dc",
        "strong_pick": false,
        "total_expected": 2.28,
        "under_prob": 60.1
      },
      "prob_source": "poisson",
      "value_bet_enhanced": {
        "bookmaker_id": 0,
        "bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
        "edge": 23.9,
        "implied_prob": 44.8,
        "is_value": true,
        "label": "Away",
        "market": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba Win",
        "model_prob": 55.6,
        "odds": 2.23
      }
    },
    "closing_line_bundle": {
      "away_team": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
      "closing_1x2_probs_pct": {
        "away": 43.34,
        "draw": 32.0,
        "home": 24.66
      },
      "closing_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
      "closing_capture": "PRE1",
      "closing_fetched_at": "2026-08-16 23:14:02",
      "early_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
      "early_capture": "PRE30",
      "early_fetched_at": "2026-08-16 22:44:02",
      "has_data": true,
      "home_team": "Central C\u00f3rdoba",
      "largest_move_kind": null,
      "max_abs_move_pp": 0.0,
      "model_vs_closing": [
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 24.66,
          "gap_pp": -8.64,
          "kind": "1x2_h",
          "model_pct": 16.01
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 32.0,
          "gap_pp": -3.53,
          "kind": "1x2_d",
          "model_pct": 28.47
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 43.34,
          "gap_pp": 12.18,
          "kind": "1x2_a",
          "model_pct": 55.52
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 34.43,
          "gap_pp": 5.47,
          "kind": "ou_o",
          "model_pct": 39.9
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 65.57,
          "gap_pp": -5.47,
          "kind": "ou_u",
          "model_pct": 60.1
        }
      ],
      "movement": [
        {
          "closing": 3.92,
          "early": 3.92,
          "implied_closing_pct": 24.66,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 24.66,
          "kind": "1x2_h"
        },
        {
          "closing": 3.02,
          "early": 3.02,
          "implied_closing_pct": 32.0,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 32.0,
          "kind": "1x2_d"
        },
        {
          "closing": 2.23,
          "early": 2.23,
          "implied_closing_pct": 43.34,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 43.34,
          "kind": "1x2_a"
        },
        {
          "closing": 2.8,
          "early": 2.8,
          "implied_closing_pct": 34.43,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 34.43,
          "kind": "ou_o"
        },
        {
          "closing": 1.47,
          "early": 1.47,
          "implied_closing_pct": 65.57,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 65.57,
          "kind": "ou_u"
        }
      ],
      "movement_negligible": true,
      "same_bookmaker": true,
      "top_value_gap": {
        "gap_pp": 12.2,
        "kind": "1x2_a"
      }
    },
    "correct_score_insight": {
      "best_value": null,
      "lean_card": {
        "diff_pp": -1.6,
        "ev": -0.0937,
        "has_edge": false,
        "label": "0-1",
        "market_odds": 5.7,
        "market_prob": 0.1754,
        "market_prob_pct": 17.5,
        "model_prob": 0.159,
        "model_prob_pct": 15.9,
        "n_bookmakers": 10,
        "status_key": "no_value"
      },
      "most_likely": {
        "label": "0-1",
        "prob": 15.9
      },
      "top5": [
        {
          "label": "0-1",
          "prob": 15.9
        },
        {
          "label": "0-2",
          "prob": 12.3
        },
        {
          "label": "1-1",
          "prob": 11.6
        },
        {
          "label": "0-0",
          "prob": 10.2
        },
        {
          "label": "1-2",
          "prob": 9.0
        }
      ]
    },
    "home_xg": 0.73,
    "homepage_pick": {
      "best_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
      "best_odds": 2.23,
      "confidence": "moderate",
      "display_label": "Away Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
      "edge": 10.7,
      "ev": 23.9,
      "probability": 55.5
    },
    "market_cards": [
      {
        "authority_action": "lean",
        "authority_note": "Selective consensus value may exist \u2014 below default Primary sizing bar.",
        "consensus_odds": 2.23,
        "decision": "value_bet",
        "disagreement_label": "Moderate",
        "disagreement_level": "moderate",
        "ev": 0.0664,
        "ev_available": true,
        "ev_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": 6.6,
          "text": "+6.6%"
        },
        "featured": true,
        "id": "1x2",
        "implied_prob": 0.4334,
        "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
        "max_ev": 0.0664,
        "max_ev_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": 6.6,
          "text": "+6.6%"
        },
        "model_prob": 0.5552,
        "raw_edge_display": "+12.2 percentage points",
        "raw_edge_pp": 12.2,
        "raw_signal_ev": 0.2381,
        "raw_signal_ev_display": "+23.8%",
        "show_primary_label": false,
        "side_label": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
        "sort_key": 10209.76,
        "tier": "best"
      },
      {
        "decision": "lean",
        "decision_layer": {
          "available": false
        },
        "ev_available": false,
        "ev_over": null,
        "ev_over_display": null,
        "ev_under": null,
        "ev_under_display": null,
        "featured": false,
        "id": "ou_2_5",
        "max_ev": null,
        "n_bookmakers": 0,
        "over_prob": 39.9,
        "sort_key": 4050.0,
        "tier": "lean",
        "under_prob": 60.1,
        "value_side": "under"
      },
      {
        "decision": "lean",
        "decision_layer": {
          "available": false
        },
        "ev_available": false,
        "ev_no": null,
        "ev_no_display": null,
        "ev_yes": null,
        "ev_yes_display": null,
        "featured": false,
        "id": "btts",
        "max_ev": null,
        "n_bookmakers": 0,
        "no_prob": 57.7,
        "sort_key": 4050.0,
        "tier": "lean",
        "value_side": "no",
        "yes_prob": 42.3
      },
      {
        "featured": false,
        "id": "correct_score",
        "sort_key": 827.7,
        "tier": "risk",
        "top_label": "0-1",
        "top_prob": 15.9
      }
    ],
    "market_intelligence": {
      "betting_signal": {
        "alert_breadth": "10/13",
        "alert_breadth_note": "10/13 sportsbooks confirmed",
        "alert_move": "\u2191 +14.7%",
        "alert_team": "Central C\u00f3rdoba",
        "alert_title": "Sharp Money Alert",
        "divergence_pp": 12.2,
        "has_alert": true,
        "hero_edge_pp": 12.11,
        "hero_label": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
        "market_prob_pct": 43.3,
        "market_team": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
        "model_prob_pct": 55.5,
        "model_team": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
        "show": true,
        "status_icon": "!",
        "status_key": "caution",
        "status_label": "Use caution",
        "status_line": "Use caution \u2014 signals are mixed",
        "steam_score": 43,
        "steam_subtitle": "Moderate sharp signal",
        "steam_tier": "B",
        "title": "Betting Signal"
      },
      "decision_chain": {
        "academy_links": [
          {
            "key": "market_disagree",
            "read_min": 5,
            "title": "When Should You Trust AI Over the Market?",
            "url": "/academy/ai-betting/when-should-you-trust-ai-over-the-market/en"
          },
          {
            "key": "steam",
            "read_min": 4,
            "title": "What Is a Steam Move?",
            "url": "/academy/betting-market/what-is-a-steam-move/en"
          },
          {
            "key": "clv_pending",
            "read_min": 3,
            "title": "Why CLV Matters More Than Win Rate",
            "url": "/academy/clv/why-clv-matters-more-than-win-rate/en"
          }
        ],
        "alignment": {
          "direction_aligned": true,
          "direction_key": "agree",
          "gap_pp": 12.2,
          "key": "agree",
          "label": "Agree",
          "model_strong": false,
          "pricing_aligned": true,
          "pricing_key": "moderate",
          "probability_gap_pp": 12.2,
          "summary": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Instituto C\u00f3rdoba)."
        },
        "authority": {
          "action": "lean",
          "alignment": {
            "direction_aligned": true,
            "direction_key": "agree",
            "gap_pp": 12.2,
            "key": "agree",
            "label": "Agree",
            "model_strong": false,
            "pricing_aligned": true,
            "pricing_key": "moderate",
            "probability_gap_pp": 12.2,
            "summary": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Instituto C\u00f3rdoba)."
          },
          "alignment_key": "agree",
          "best_consensus_ev": 0.0664,
          "best_outlier_ev": 0.238,
          "confidence_band": "Moderate",
          "decision_strength": 6.8,
          "decision_strength_v1": 6.0,
          "decision_strength_v2": 6.3,
          "decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
          "execution_confidence": 54,
          "extreme_disagreement": false,
          "final_verdict_audit": {
            "action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
            "action_label": "Action",
            "decision": "Selective Lean - No Primary Bet",
            "is_primary": false,
            "snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Instituto C\u00f3rdoba at 55.5%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 43.3%.",
            "why": [
              {
                "text": "Decision Model identifies Instituto C\u00f3rdoba as the value side (55.5%)",
                "tone": "ok"
              },
              {
                "text": "Market broadly agrees with the direction",
                "tone": "ok"
              },
              {
                "text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
                "tone": "bad"
              }
            ],
            "why_label": "Decision Summary"
          },
          "gap_pp": 12.2,
          "gates_failed": [
            "Execution confidence below 65"
          ],
          "has_top_pick": true,
          "headline": "Selective Lean - No Primary Bet",
          "hero_mode": "default",
          "icon": "\u2192",
          "label": "Lean only \u2014 not a default Primary",
          "market_signal": "Market aligns with model lean",
          "model_conflict_detail": null,
          "model_lean": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
          "no_primary_reasons": {
            "all_triggered": [
              "market_quality"
            ],
            "calibration_mode": null,
            "codes": [
              "market_quality"
            ],
            "label": "Reason",
            "other_factors": [],
            "other_label": "Other factors",
            "primary": {
              "code": "market_quality",
              "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
              "name": "Market Quality Risk",
              "short": "Market Quality Risk",
              "tone": "warn"
            },
            "secondary": null,
            "version": "v1"
          },
          "outlier_detected": true,
          "outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market 1X2 \u00b7 side Instituto C\u00f3rdoba \u00b7 decimal odds ~2.23 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +24% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1493065 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22482.23 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +6.6% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
          "primary_allowed": false,
          "primary_block_explain": {
            "entries": [
              {
                "key": "positive_ev",
                "label": "Consensus EV +6.6% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
                "ok": true
              },
              {
                "key": "gate",
                "label": "Execution confidence below 65",
                "ok": false
              }
            ],
            "lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
            "primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
            "subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
            "title": "Why not Primary?"
          },
          "primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +6.6% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration Clear \u2705 \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 6.8/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
          "primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +6.6% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: Clear \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 6.8/10 (display only)",
          "primary_gates": {
            "items": [
              {
                "key": "extreme_gap",
                "label": "Extreme gap",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "no"
              },
              {
                "key": "xg_calibration",
                "label": "xG calibration",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "ok"
              },
              {
                "key": "reliability",
                "label": "Rel",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "68 (\u226565)"
              },
              {
                "key": "execution",
                "label": "Exec",
                "ok": false,
                "value": "54 (\u226565)"
              },
              {
                "key": "alignment",
                "label": "Align",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "agree"
              },
              {
                "key": "consensus_ev",
                "label": "ConsEV",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "+6.6% (\u2265+5.0%)"
              },
              {
                "key": "top_pick",
                "label": "Pick",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "true"
              },
              {
                "key": "validation",
                "label": "Validation",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "true"
              }
            ],
            "passed": 7,
            "total": 8
          },
          "primary_type": null,
          "reasons": [
            "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Instituto C\u00f3rdoba).",
            "Decision strength: 6.8/10",
            "Execution confidence below 65",
            "Outlier price +24% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
          ],
          "reliability_score": 68,
          "speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
          "strength_v2_breakdown": [
            "Base decision score (v1)",
            "Reliability supports action",
            "Market aligns with model",
            "Consensus-line +EV",
            "Clear xG separation"
          ],
          "subline": "Selective consensus value may exist \u2014 below default Primary sizing bar.",
          "thresholds": {
            "extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
            "lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
            "lean_min_strength": 5.0,
            "min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
            "min_execution": 65,
            "min_reliability": 65,
            "min_strength": 7.0,
            "source": "db",
            "user_id": 2
          },
          "thresholds_source": "db",
          "thresholds_user_id": 2,
          "tier": "lean",
          "validation_ok": true,
          "value_context": {
            "consensus_ev": 0.0664,
            "consensus_ev_display": "+6.6%",
            "consensus_odds": 2.23,
            "disagreement_label": "Moderate",
            "disagreement_level": "moderate",
            "implied_prob": 0.4334,
            "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
            "model_prob": 0.5552,
            "raw_edge_display": "+12.2 percentage points",
            "raw_edge_pp": 12.2,
            "raw_implied_prob": 0.4484304932735426,
            "raw_signal_ev": 0.2381,
            "raw_signal_ev_display": "+23.8%"
          },
          "version": "v2.5",
          "xg_calibration": {
            "block_value_alert": false,
            "calibration_status": "ok",
            "deviation_pct": 14.8,
            "reasons": [
              "Clear xG separation gap=0.82"
            ],
            "recommended_action": "ok",
            "strength_delta": 0.5,
            "uplift_away": null,
            "uplift_home": null,
            "xg_separation": {
              "band": "clear",
              "block_value_alert": false,
              "separation_score": 5,
              "strength_delta": 0.5,
              "xg_gap": 0.82
            }
          }
        },
        "bet_status": "lean",
        "books_breadth_display": "10/13",
        "breadth_ratio": 0.7692307692307693,
        "evidence": {
          "score": 86,
          "signals": [
            {
              "icon": "\u2713",
              "key": "statistical_edge",
              "label": "Statistical edge detected",
              "status": "pass"
            },
            {
              "icon": "!",
              "key": "market_agreement",
              "label": "Direction agrees; pricing still diverges",
              "status": "caution"
            },
            {
              "icon": "\u2713",
              "key": "steam",
              "label": "Market drift supports model side (direction only \u2014 not pricing convergence)",
              "status": "pass"
            },
            {
              "icon": "!",
              "key": "validation",
              "label": "Validation warning",
              "status": "caution"
            }
          ],
          "stars": 4,
          "tier": "high",
          "tier_label": "High"
        },
        "forecast_reliability": {
          "breakdown": [
            {
              "key": "validation",
              "label": "Validation: Warning",
              "tone": "caution"
            },
            {
              "key": "gap",
              "label": "Large market gap (12 pp)",
              "tone": "caution"
            },
            {
              "key": "steam",
              "label": "Market drift aligns with model",
              "tone": "ok"
            }
          ],
          "parts": {
            "alignment": 18.9,
            "data_quality": 12.0,
            "market_coverage": 7.7,
            "steam_coherence": 10.0,
            "validation": 14.0
          },
          "score": 68,
          "stars": 3,
          "tier": "moderate",
          "tier_label": "Moderate"
        },
        "lean_gap_pp": 12.11,
        "market_agreement": "weak",
        "max_gap_pp": 12.11,
        "model_calibration": {
          "away_xg": 1.55,
          "calibration_status": "ok",
          "deviation_pct": 15.0,
          "elevated": false,
          "home_xg": 0.73,
          "impact_note": "",
          "league_avg_xg": 1.35,
          "peak_xg": 1.55,
          "status_label": "Within typical league range",
          "summary": "Home xG 0.73 \u00b7 Away xG 1.55 \u00b7 League avg 1.35 \u00b7 Peak deviation +15%",
          "title": "Model Calibration Check"
        },
        "move_is_drift": true,
        "mv_status": "warning",
        "odds_delta_pct": 14.7,
        "steam_conflicts": false,
        "steam_move_display": "\u2191 +14.7%",
        "steam_team": "Central C\u00f3rdoba",
        "suppress_execution": false,
        "value_split": {
          "execution_confidence": {
            "label": "Betting Confidence",
            "score": 54,
            "tier": "moderate",
            "tier_label": "Moderate"
          },
          "market_compatibility": {
            "label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
            "note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
            "score": 39,
            "tier": "low",
            "tier_label": "Low"
          },
          "model_edge_strength": {
            "label": "Model Signal Strength",
            "score": 55,
            "tier": "moderate",
            "tier_label": "Moderate"
          },
          "model_value": {
            "label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
            "note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
            "score": 39,
            "tier": "low",
            "tier_label": "Low"
          },
          "recommendation": {
            "action": "lean",
            "label": "Selective Lean - No Primary Bet"
          }
        },
        "verdict": {
          "agree_note": "Selective consensus value may exist \u2014 below default Primary sizing bar.",
          "alignment": {
            "direction_aligned": true,
            "direction_key": "agree",
            "gap_pp": 12.2,
            "key": "agree",
            "label": "Agree",
            "model_strong": false,
            "pricing_aligned": true,
            "pricing_key": "moderate",
            "probability_gap_pp": 12.2,
            "summary": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Instituto C\u00f3rdoba)."
          },
          "authority": {
            "action": "lean",
            "alignment": {
              "direction_aligned": true,
              "direction_key": "agree",
              "gap_pp": 12.2,
              "key": "agree",
              "label": "Agree",
              "model_strong": false,
              "pricing_aligned": true,
              "pricing_key": "moderate",
              "probability_gap_pp": 12.2,
              "summary": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Instituto C\u00f3rdoba)."
            },
            "alignment_key": "agree",
            "best_consensus_ev": 0.0664,
            "best_outlier_ev": 0.238,
            "confidence_band": "Moderate",
            "decision_strength": 6.8,
            "decision_strength_v1": 6.0,
            "decision_strength_v2": 6.3,
            "decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
            "execution_confidence": 54,
            "extreme_disagreement": false,
            "final_verdict_audit": {
              "action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
              "action_label": "Action",
              "decision": "Selective Lean - No Primary Bet",
              "is_primary": false,
              "snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Instituto C\u00f3rdoba at 55.5%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 43.3%.",
              "why": [
                {
                  "text": "Decision Model identifies Instituto C\u00f3rdoba as the value side (55.5%)",
                  "tone": "ok"
                },
                {
                  "text": "Market broadly agrees with the direction",
                  "tone": "ok"
                },
                {
                  "text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
                  "tone": "bad"
                }
              ],
              "why_label": "Decision Summary"
            },
            "gap_pp": 12.2,
            "gates_failed": [
              "Execution confidence below 65"
            ],
            "has_top_pick": true,
            "headline": "Selective Lean - No Primary Bet",
            "hero_mode": "default",
            "icon": "\u2192",
            "label": "Lean only \u2014 not a default Primary",
            "market_signal": "Market aligns with model lean",
            "model_conflict_detail": null,
            "model_lean": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
            "no_primary_reasons": {
              "all_triggered": [
                "market_quality"
              ],
              "calibration_mode": null,
              "codes": [
                "market_quality"
              ],
              "label": "Reason",
              "other_factors": [],
              "other_label": "Other factors",
              "primary": {
                "code": "market_quality",
                "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
                "name": "Market Quality Risk",
                "short": "Market Quality Risk",
                "tone": "warn"
              },
              "secondary": null,
              "version": "v1"
            },
            "outlier_detected": true,
            "outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market 1X2 \u00b7 side Instituto C\u00f3rdoba \u00b7 decimal odds ~2.23 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +24% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1493065 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22482.23 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +6.6% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
            "primary_allowed": false,
            "primary_block_explain": {
              "entries": [
                {
                  "key": "positive_ev",
                  "label": "Consensus EV +6.6% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
                  "ok": true
                },
                {
                  "key": "gate",
                  "label": "Execution confidence below 65",
                  "ok": false
                }
              ],
              "lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
              "primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
              "subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
              "title": "Why not Primary?"
            },
            "primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +6.6% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration Clear \u2705 \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 6.8/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
            "primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +6.6% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: Clear \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 6.8/10 (display only)",
            "primary_gates": {
              "items": [
                {
                  "key": "extreme_gap",
                  "label": "Extreme gap",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "no"
                },
                {
                  "key": "xg_calibration",
                  "label": "xG calibration",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "ok"
                },
                {
                  "key": "reliability",
                  "label": "Rel",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "68 (\u226565)"
                },
                {
                  "key": "execution",
                  "label": "Exec",
                  "ok": false,
                  "value": "54 (\u226565)"
                },
                {
                  "key": "alignment",
                  "label": "Align",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "agree"
                },
                {
                  "key": "consensus_ev",
                  "label": "ConsEV",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "+6.6% (\u2265+5.0%)"
                },
                {
                  "key": "top_pick",
                  "label": "Pick",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "true"
                },
                {
                  "key": "validation",
                  "label": "Validation",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "true"
                }
              ],
              "passed": 7,
              "total": 8
            },
            "primary_type": null,
            "reasons": [
              "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Instituto C\u00f3rdoba).",
              "Decision strength: 6.8/10",
              "Execution confidence below 65",
              "Outlier price +24% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
            ],
            "reliability_score": 68,
            "speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
            "strength_v2_breakdown": [
              "Base decision score (v1)",
              "Reliability supports action",
              "Market aligns with model",
              "Consensus-line +EV",
              "Clear xG separation"
            ],
            "subline": "Selective consensus value may exist \u2014 below default Primary sizing bar.",
            "thresholds": {
              "extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
              "lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
              "lean_min_strength": 5.0,
              "min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
              "min_execution": 65,
              "min_reliability": 65,
              "min_strength": 7.0,
              "source": "db",
              "user_id": 2
            },
            "thresholds_source": "db",
            "thresholds_user_id": 2,
            "tier": "lean",
            "validation_ok": true,
            "value_context": {
              "consensus_ev": 0.0664,
              "consensus_ev_display": "+6.6%",
              "consensus_odds": 2.23,
              "disagreement_label": "Moderate",
              "disagreement_level": "moderate",
              "implied_prob": 0.4334,
              "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
              "model_prob": 0.5552,
              "raw_edge_display": "+12.2 percentage points",
              "raw_edge_pp": 12.2,
              "raw_implied_prob": 0.4484304932735426,
              "raw_signal_ev": 0.2381,
              "raw_signal_ev_display": "+23.8%"
            },
            "version": "v2.5",
            "xg_calibration": {
              "block_value_alert": false,
              "calibration_status": "ok",
              "deviation_pct": 14.8,
              "reasons": [
                "Clear xG separation gap=0.82"
              ],
              "recommended_action": "ok",
              "strength_delta": 0.5,
              "uplift_away": null,
              "uplift_home": null,
              "xg_separation": {
                "band": "clear",
                "block_value_alert": false,
                "separation_score": 5,
                "strength_delta": 0.5,
                "xg_gap": 0.82
              }
            }
          },
          "headline": "Selective Lean - No Primary Bet",
          "icon": "\u2192",
          "label": "Lean only \u2014 not a default Primary",
          "subline": "Selective consensus value may exist \u2014 below default Primary sizing bar.",
          "tier": "lean"
        },
        "why": {
          "action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
          "bullets": [
            "Model: Central C\u00f3rdoba 0.73 xG vs Instituto C\u00f3rdoba 1.55 \u2192 Instituto C\u00f3rdoba 55.5%",
            "Market: Instituto C\u00f3rdoba ~43.3% implied",
            "Market Drift: Central C\u00f3rdoba odds \u2191 +14.7%"
          ],
          "one_liner": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba projects stronger on expected goals (+0.82 xG edge).",
          "title": "Why?"
        }
      },
      "edge_rows": [
        {
          "edge_pp": -8.64,
          "fair_prob": 16.02,
          "label": "Central C\u00f3rdoba",
          "market_prob": 24.66,
          "market_type": "1x2",
          "outcome": "home"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": -3.47,
          "fair_prob": 28.53,
          "label": "Draw",
          "market_prob": 32.0,
          "market_type": "1x2",
          "outcome": "draw"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": 12.11,
          "fair_prob": 55.45,
          "label": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
          "market_prob": 43.34,
          "market_type": "1x2",
          "outcome": "away"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": null,
          "fair_prob": 39.9,
          "label": "Over 2.5",
          "market_prob": null,
          "market_type": "ou25",
          "outcome": "over"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": null,
          "fair_prob": 60.1,
          "label": "Under 2.5",
          "market_prob": null,
          "market_type": "ou25",
          "outcome": "under"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": null,
          "fair_prob": 42.3,
          "label": "BTTS Yes",
          "market_prob": null,
          "market_type": "btts",
          "outcome": "yes"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": null,
          "fair_prob": 57.7,
          "label": "BTTS No",
          "market_prob": null,
          "market_type": "btts",
          "outcome": "no"
        }
      ],
      "edge_snapshot": {
        "edge_label": "strong_disagreement",
        "edge_pp": 12.11,
        "fair_prob_pct": 55.45,
        "hero_side": "away",
        "hero_team_name": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
        "market_prob_pct": 43.34,
        "status": "strong_disagreement",
        "steam_team_name": "Central C\u00f3rdoba"
      },
      "fair_source": "poisson_pipeline",
      "fair_vs_market": {
        "closing_capture": "PRE1",
        "closing_footnote": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
        "comparison_available": true,
        "comparison_disabled": false,
        "comparison_summary": "The statistical model estimates Instituto C\u00f3rdoba\u0027s win probability at 55.5%, compared with the closing market\u0027s implied probability of 43.3%, a difference of 12.1 percentage points. This highlights a substantial disagreement between the model\u0027s assessment and the market consensus, rather than indicating which view is ultimately correct.",
        "degraded_note": "",
        "divergence_guard": {
          "divergence_level": "strong",
          "edge_status": "strong_disagreement",
          "max_gap_pp": 12.11,
          "suppress_hero": false,
          "suppress_value_language": false
        },
        "divergence_label": "Strong model-market divergence",
        "divergence_level": "strong",
        "divergence_level_label": "Strong divergence",
        "divergence_note": "The fair estimate differs noticeably from current market pricing. This may reflect genuine disagreement or incomplete rating inputs.",
        "divergence_tier": "strong",
        "edge_label": "Strong disagreement",
        "edge_label_key": "strong_disagreement",
        "fair_confidence": "medium",
        "fair_confidence_label": "Medium",
        "fair_source_note": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
        "forecast_assessment": {
          "favourite_class": "Slight favourite",
          "favourite_label": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
          "forecast_certainty_tier": "high",
          "headline": "Slight edge match",
          "market_agreement_label": "Weak",
          "market_direction": {
            "label": "Supports model direction",
            "positive": true
          },
          "market_prob_pct": 43.3,
          "model_prob_gap_display": "+12.2 percentage points",
          "model_prob_gap_pp": 12.2,
          "model_prob_pct": 55.5,
          "outcome_separation_tier": "high",
          "paragraphs": [],
          "pricing_convergence": {
            "gap_display": "+12.2 percentage points",
            "gap_pp": 12.2,
            "label": "Moderate",
            "label_key": "mi_fa_pricing_moderate"
          },
          "reliability_headline": "Moderate reliability",
          "reliability_icon": "\u2713",
          "reliability_score": 68,
          "reliability_tier": "moderate",
          "summary": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba \u2014 market direction supports the model lean.",
          "tier": "slight_edge",
          "title": "Prediction Assessment",
          "validation_label": "Warning",
          "value_split": {
            "execution_confidence": {
              "label": "Betting Confidence",
              "score": 54,
              "tier": "moderate",
              "tier_label": "Moderate"
            },
            "market_compatibility": {
              "label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
              "note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
              "score": 39,
              "tier": "low",
              "tier_label": "Low"
            },
            "model_edge_strength": {
              "label": "Model Signal Strength",
              "score": 55,
              "tier": "moderate",
              "tier_label": "Moderate"
            },
            "model_value": {
              "label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
              "note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
              "score": 39,
              "tier": "low",
              "tier_label": "Low"
            },
            "recommendation": {
              "action": "lean",
              "label": "Selective Lean - No Primary Bet"
            }
          },
          "why": {
            "action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
            "bullets": [
              "Model: Central C\u00f3rdoba 0.73 xG vs Instituto C\u00f3rdoba 1.55 \u2192 Instituto C\u00f3rdoba 55.5%",
              "Market: Instituto C\u00f3rdoba ~43.3% implied",
              "Market Drift: Central C\u00f3rdoba odds \u2191 +14.7%"
            ],
            "one_liner": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba projects stronger on expected goals (+0.82 xG edge).",
            "title": "Why?"
          }
        },
        "forecast_certainty": {
          "note": "One outcome clearly leads the model 1X2 grid.",
          "tier": "high",
          "tier_label": "High"
        },
        "forecast_certainty_label": "High",
        "has_market_probs": true,
        "hero_edge_pp": 12.11,
        "hero_label": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
        "hero_side": "away",
        "market_activity": "Central C\u00f3rdoba odds lengthened \u2191 +14.7%.",
        "market_agreement": "weak",
        "market_agreement_label": "Weak",
        "market_interpretation": {
          "bullets": [
            "The model may see a slower-scoring or closer matchup than the market.",
            "Monitor line movement before kickoff \u2014 not a betting recommendation."
          ],
          "follow_up": "However, Central C\u00f3rdoba has seen drift \u2014 odds lengthened by 14.7%, suggesting weakening support.",
          "gap_tier": "strong",
          "lead": "The statistical fair estimate is materially higher than the market on Instituto C\u00f3rdoba.",
          "note": "Drift away from Central C\u00f3rdoba \u2014 odds lengthened by 14.7% (weakening support).",
          "paragraphs": [
            "The statistical fair estimate is materially higher than the market on Instituto C\u00f3rdoba.",
            "However, Central C\u00f3rdoba has seen drift \u2014 odds lengthened by 14.7%, suggesting weakening support.",
            "Drift away from Central C\u00f3rdoba \u2014 odds lengthened by 14.7% (weakening support)."
          ],
          "quiet_market": false,
          "title": "Market Assessment"
        },
        "market_narrative": {
          "paragraphs": [
            "The fair estimate favors Instituto C\u00f3rdoba more strongly than current market pricing.",
            "At the same time, Central C\u00f3rdoba has drifted \u2014 odds lengthened by 14.7%, suggesting weakening support.",
            "Broad sportsbook alignment (10/13) supports the current market view on Central C\u00f3rdoba."
          ],
          "title": "Current Market Narrative"
        },
        "market_source": "closing_1x2",
        "max_gap_pp": 12.11,
        "model_validation": {
          "score_label_key": "mi_mv_warning",
          "status": "warning"
        },
        "model_validation_label": "Warning",
        "outcome_separation": {
          "breakdown": [
            "Favourite exceeds second outcome by 26.9 pp (at 55.5%)."
          ],
          "lead_gap_pp": 26.9,
          "max_prob_pct": 55.5,
          "note": "How spread out the model 1X2 probabilities are \u2014 crowded splits mean no single outcome dominates. Not accuracy vs the market.",
          "tier": "high",
          "tier_label": "High"
        },
        "outcome_separation_label": "High",
        "overall_assessment": {
          "badge_class": "strong",
          "largest_gap_label": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
          "largest_gap_pp": 12.1,
          "lead": "The model rates Instituto C\u00f3rdoba considerably stronger than the closing betting market.",
          "level": "strong",
          "max_gap_pp": 12.1,
          "title": "Strong Disagreement"
        },
        "rows": [
          {
            "difference_pp": -8.64,
            "edge_pp": -8.64,
            "fair_prob_pct": 16.02,
            "is_hero": false,
            "label": "Central C\u00f3rdoba",
            "market_prob_pct": 24.66,
            "side": "home",
            "signal_key": "market_higher",
            "signal_label": "Market Higher"
          },
          {
            "difference_pp": -3.47,
            "edge_pp": -3.47,
            "fair_prob_pct": 28.53,
            "is_hero": false,
            "label": "Draw",
            "market_prob_pct": 32.0,
            "side": "draw",
            "signal_key": "aligned",
            "signal_label": "Aligned"
          },
          {
            "difference_pp": 12.11,
            "edge_pp": 12.11,
            "fair_prob_pct": 55.45,
            "is_hero": true,
            "label": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
            "market_prob_pct": 43.34,
            "side": "away",
            "signal_key": "model_edge",
            "signal_label": "Model Edge"
          }
        ],
        "status": "strong_disagreement",
        "status_label": "Strong Disagreement",
        "steam_note": "Drift away from Central C\u00f3rdoba \u2014 odds lengthened by 14.7% (weakening support).",
        "unavailable_note": ""
      },
      "interpretation": {
        "has_conflict": false,
        "paragraphs": [
          "The betting market strongly prefers Instituto C\u00f3rdoba (43.3%).",
          "Central C\u00f3rdoba odds have drifted longer across books (\u2191 +14.7%, 10/13) \u2014 market pricing moves against this side.",
          "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba \u2014 market direction supports the model lean."
        ],
        "show": true,
        "title": "OddsGPT Interpretation"
      },
      "lifecycle": {
        "closing_implied_pct": 44.84,
        "closing_odds": 2.23,
        "closing_reason": "",
        "closing_status": "recorded",
        "closing_status_label": "Recorded",
        "clv_pending": true,
        "clv_pp": 0.0,
        "clv_reason": "",
        "clv_status": "pending",
        "context": "match",
        "current_stage": "waiting_for_kickoff",
        "current_stage_detail": "",
        "current_stage_label": "Waiting for kickoff",
        "entry_implied_pct": 44.84,
        "entry_odds": 2.23,
        "match_phase": "upcoming",
        "match_phase_detail": "",
        "match_phase_display": "Upcoming",
        "match_phase_label": "Upcoming",
        "model_validation_label": "Warning",
        "model_validation_status": "warning",
        "stages": [
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "forecast_generated",
            "label": "Prediction Generated",
            "status": "done"
          },
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "market_detected",
            "label": "Market Compared",
            "status": "active"
          },
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "model_validated",
            "label": "Validation Passed",
            "status": "active"
          },
          {
            "detail": "PRE1",
            "id": "closing_recorded",
            "label": "Closing Recorded",
            "status": "done"
          },
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "clv_evaluated",
            "label": "CLV Evaluated",
            "status": "pending"
          }
        ]
      },
      "market_move_intelligence": {
        "books_reacting": 10,
        "books_reacting_detail": [
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 8,
            "bookmaker_name": "Bet365",
            "is_sharp": true,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2191 +14.7%",
            "odds_delta_pct": 14.7
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 1,
            "bookmaker_name": "10Bet",
            "is_sharp": false,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2191 +12.1%",
            "odds_delta_pct": 12.1
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 21,
            "bookmaker_name": "888Sport",
            "is_sharp": false,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2191 +12.1%",
            "odds_delta_pct": 12.1
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 7,
            "bookmaker_name": "William Hill",
            "is_sharp": false,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2191 +12.1%",
            "odds_delta_pct": 12.1
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 32,
            "bookmaker_name": "Betano",
            "is_sharp": false,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2191 +11.6%",
            "odds_delta_pct": 11.6
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 9,
            "bookmaker_name": "Dafabet",
            "is_sharp": false,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2191 +10.3%",
            "odds_delta_pct": 10.3
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 11,
            "bookmaker_name": "1xBet",
            "is_sharp": false,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2191 +10.2%",
            "odds_delta_pct": 10.2
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 2,
            "bookmaker_name": "Marathonbet",
            "is_sharp": false,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2191 +10.1%",
            "odds_delta_pct": 10.1
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 3,
            "bookmaker_name": "Betfair",
            "is_sharp": true,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2191 +9.1%",
            "odds_delta_pct": 9.1
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 36,
            "bookmaker_name": "BetVictor",
            "is_sharp": false,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2191 +8.8%",
            "odds_delta_pct": 8.8
          }
        ],
        "books_total": 13,
        "breadth_display": "10/13",
        "clv_label": "+0.00 pp",
        "clv_status": "evaluated",
        "current_odds": 3.9,
        "is_drift": true,
        "move_context": "Largest move today",
        "move_display": "\u2191 +14.7%",
        "move_pct_abs": 14.7,
        "move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
        "move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 135h 14m",
        "narrative_paragraphs": [
          "Multi-book drift on Central C\u00f3rdoba (14.7%, 10/13) \u2014 aligned lengthening, market pricing moves against this side.",
          "Noticeable drift \u2014 odds lengthened with multi-book confirmation (not steam)."
        ],
        "narrative_title": "Market Narrative",
        "odds_delta_pct": 14.7,
        "odds_path": {
          "chart_y_labels": [
            "3.92",
            "3.66",
            "3.40"
          ],
          "display": "3.96 \u2192 3.30 \u2192 3.90",
          "move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
          "move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 135h 14m",
          "pick_team": "Central C\u00f3rdoba",
          "points": [
            {
              "label_key": "open",
              "value": "3.96"
            },
            {
              "label_key": "extreme",
              "value": "3.30"
            },
            {
              "label_key": "current",
              "value": "3.90"
            }
          ],
          "sparkline_points": [
            3.4,
            3.92,
            3.9
          ],
          "sparkline_polyline": "0.0,18.0 28.0,0.0 56.0,0.7",
          "sparkline_trend": "up",
          "sparkline_trend_label": "One-way rise",
          "summary_boxes": [
            {
              "label_key": "open",
              "value": "3.40"
            },
            {
              "label_key": "low",
              "value": "3.40"
            },
            {
              "label_key": "high",
              "value": "3.92"
            },
            {
              "label_key": "current",
              "value": "3.90"
            }
          ]
        },
        "open_odds": 3.4,
        "page_alert_line": "Broad drift across 10/13 sportsbooks on Central C\u00f3rdoba",
        "phase_label": "Market drift",
        "phase_tip": "Broad lengthening \u2014 market pricing moves against the tracked side.",
        "pick_team": "Central C\u00f3rdoba",
        "ref_book": "Bet365",
        "seo_title_alert": "",
        "sharp_leader": "Bet365",
        "show": true,
        "signal_badge_class": "fade",
        "signal_icon": "\u2198",
        "signal_impact": {
          "current_odds": 3.9,
          "is_drift": true,
          "label": "Market Signal",
          "move_display": "\u2191 +14.7%",
          "open_odds": 3.4,
          "summary": "Broad market drift supports the same direction as the model lean.",
          "team": "Central C\u00f3rdoba",
          "tone": "with"
        },
        "signal_key": "market_drift",
        "signal_label": "Drift",
        "steam_score": 43,
        "steam_subtitle": "Moderate sharp signal",
        "steam_tier": "B",
        "title": "Market Move Intelligence"
      },
      "market_overview": {
        "breadth_display": "10/13",
        "current_odds": 3.9,
        "move_display": "\u2191 +14.7%",
        "open_odds": 3.4,
        "pick_team": "Central C\u00f3rdoba",
        "steam_score": 43,
        "steam_team_name": "Central C\u00f3rdoba",
        "steam_tier": "B"
      },
      "premium_teaser": {
        "current_divergence_pp": 12.1,
        "divergence_label": "Current divergence",
        "title": "Premium Market Intelligence",
        "unlock_items": [
          "Historical similar matches",
          "Closing odds analysis",
          "CLV tracking",
          "Sharp money signals",
          "Market efficiency rating",
          "Historical model vs market results"
        ],
        "unlock_label": "Unlock"
      },
      "show": true
    },
    "match": {
      "away_expected_goals": null,
      "away_goal_display": null,
      "away_team_display_name": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
      "away_team_id": 478,
      "away_team_logo": "/static/teams/478.webp",
      "away_team_name": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
      "away_team_slug": "instituto-cordoba",
      "country_code": "AR",
      "country_display_name": "Argentina",
      "country_flag": "/static/images/country/ar.svg",
      "country_id": 6,
      "country_name": "Argentina",
      "fixture_id": 1493065,
      "goals_away": null,
      "goals_home": null,
      "home_expected_goals": null,
      "home_goal_display": null,
      "home_team_country": "Argentina",
      "home_team_display_name": "Central C\u00f3rdoba",
      "home_team_id": 1065,
      "home_team_logo": "/static/teams/1065.webp",
      "home_team_name": "Central C\u00f3rdoba",
      "home_team_slug": "central-cordoba-de-santiago",
      "league_country": "Argentina",
      "league_country_display": "Argentina",
      "league_display_name": "Liga Profesional Argentina",
      "league_id": 128,
      "league_logo": "/static/leagues/128.webp",
      "league_name": "Liga Profesional Argentina",
      "league_season": 2026,
      "match_date": "2026-08-16 23:15:00",
      "score_fulltime_away": null,
      "score_fulltime_home": null,
      "score_penalty_away": null,
      "score_penalty_home": null,
      "status_long": "Not Started",
      "status_short": "NS",
      "venue_city": "Santiago del Estero",
      "venue_name": "Estadio Unico Madre de Ciudades"
    },
    "match_decision": {
      "confidence": {
        "breakdown": [
          "pred_conf_md_line_above_ev"
        ],
        "breakdown_resolved": [
          "At least one tracked line above +EV threshold (+0.5)"
        ],
        "score": 8.0
      },
      "markets": {
        "1x2": {
          "1x2_ev_mode": "market_first_p15",
          "away": {
            "alpha": 0.3678,
            "best_odd": 2.23,
            "calibration": {
              "active": false,
              "hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
            },
            "edge": 0.0448,
            "ev": 0.0664,
            "implied_prob": 0.4334,
            "joint_probs": {
              "away": 0.4334,
              "draw": 0.32,
              "home": 0.2466
            },
            "model_prob": 0.5552,
            "p_final": 0.4782
          },
          "draw": {
            "alpha": 0.2841,
            "best_odd": 3.02,
            "calibration": {
              "active": false,
              "hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
            },
            "edge": -0.01,
            "ev": -0.0638,
            "implied_prob": 0.32,
            "joint_probs": {
              "away": 0.4334,
              "draw": 0.32,
              "home": 0.2466
            },
            "model_prob": 0.2847,
            "p_final": 0.31
          },
          "ev_available": true,
          "home": {
            "alpha": 0.2611,
            "best_odd": 3.92,
            "calibration": {
              "active": false,
              "hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
            },
            "edge": -0.0226,
            "ev": -0.1219,
            "implied_prob": 0.2466,
            "joint_probs": {
              "away": 0.4334,
              "draw": 0.32,
              "home": 0.2466
            },
            "model_prob": 0.1601,
            "p_final": 0.224
          }
        },
        "1x2_outlier": {
          "1x2_ev_mode": "legacy_max_odd",
          "away": {
            "best_odd": 2.23,
            "edge": 0.1067,
            "ev": 0.238,
            "implied_prob": 0.4484,
            "model_prob": 0.5552
          },
          "draw": {
            "best_odd": 3.02,
            "edge": -0.0464,
            "ev": -0.1402,
            "implied_prob": 0.3311,
            "model_prob": 0.2847
          },
          "ev_available": true,
          "home": {
            "best_odd": 3.92,
            "edge": -0.095,
            "ev": -0.3722,
            "implied_prob": 0.2551,
            "model_prob": 0.1601
          }
        },
        "btts": {
          "btts_ev_mode": "unavailable",
          "ev_available": false,
          "market_first": {
            "available": false
          },
          "n_bookmakers": 0,
          "reliability": "low"
        },
        "ou25": {
          "ev_available": false,
          "market_first": {
            "available": false
          },
          "n_bookmakers": 0,
          "ou_ev_mode": "unavailable",
          "reliability": "low"
        }
      },
      "match_tier": "value_game",
      "min_ev": 0.02,
      "total_xg": 2.28,
      "variance_flag": false
    },
    "unified_decision": {
      "actionable_ev_threshold": 0.02,
      "algorithm": {
        "enabled_since": "2026-05-26",
        "game_typing_module": true,
        "version": "2.5.0"
      },
      "balanced_alternative": null,
      "best_consensus_ev": 0.0664,
      "best_outlier_ev": 0.238,
      "best_tracked_ev": 0.0664,
      "confidence": 6.0,
      "decision_confidence_v1": {
        "breakdown": [
          "pred_conf_v1_primary_line"
        ],
        "breakdown_resolved": [
          "Primary line identified (+1.0)"
        ],
        "breakdown_v2": [
          "Base decision score (v1)",
          "Reliability supports action",
          "Market aligns with model",
          "Consensus-line +EV",
          "Clear xG separation"
        ],
        "score": 6.8,
        "score_v1_legacy": 6.0,
        "score_v2_pre_penalty": 6.3,
        "strength_v2": true
      },
      "decision_strength_v2": {
        "breakdown": [
          "Base decision score (v1)",
          "Reliability supports action",
          "Market aligns with model",
          "Consensus-line +EV",
          "Clear xG separation"
        ],
        "score": 6.8,
        "score_pre_penalty": 6.3
      },
      "decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
      "execution": {
        "1x2_dominant": true,
        "1x2_open_contest": false,
        "grade": "A",
        "stake_factor": 1.0
      },
      "favourite_misaligned_1x2": {
        "active": false,
        "gap": null,
        "side": null
      },
      "final_action": "lean",
      "final_decision": {
        "action": "lean",
        "alignment": {
          "direction_aligned": true,
          "direction_key": "agree",
          "gap_pp": 12.2,
          "key": "agree",
          "label": "Agree",
          "model_strong": false,
          "pricing_aligned": true,
          "pricing_key": "moderate",
          "probability_gap_pp": 12.2,
          "summary": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Instituto C\u00f3rdoba)."
        },
        "alignment_key": "agree",
        "best_consensus_ev": 0.0664,
        "best_outlier_ev": 0.238,
        "confidence_band": "Moderate",
        "decision_strength": 6.8,
        "decision_strength_v1": 6.0,
        "decision_strength_v2": 6.3,
        "decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
        "execution_confidence": 54,
        "extreme_disagreement": false,
        "final_verdict_audit": {
          "action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
          "action_label": "Action",
          "decision": "Selective Lean - No Primary Bet",
          "is_primary": false,
          "snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Instituto C\u00f3rdoba at 55.5%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 43.3%.",
          "why": [
            {
              "text": "Decision Model identifies Instituto C\u00f3rdoba as the value side (55.5%)",
              "tone": "ok"
            },
            {
              "text": "Market broadly agrees with the direction",
              "tone": "ok"
            },
            {
              "text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
              "tone": "bad"
            }
          ],
          "why_label": "Decision Summary"
        },
        "gap_pp": 12.2,
        "gates_failed": [
          "Execution confidence below 65"
        ],
        "has_top_pick": true,
        "headline": "Selective Lean - No Primary Bet",
        "hero_mode": "default",
        "icon": "\u2192",
        "label": "Lean only \u2014 not a default Primary",
        "market_signal": "Market aligns with model lean",
        "model_conflict_detail": null,
        "model_lean": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
        "no_primary_reasons": {
          "all_triggered": [
            "market_quality"
          ],
          "calibration_mode": null,
          "codes": [
            "market_quality"
          ],
          "label": "Reason",
          "other_factors": [],
          "other_label": "Other factors",
          "primary": {
            "code": "market_quality",
            "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
            "name": "Market Quality Risk",
            "short": "Market Quality Risk",
            "tone": "warn"
          },
          "secondary": null,
          "version": "v1"
        },
        "outlier_detected": true,
        "outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market 1X2 \u00b7 side Instituto C\u00f3rdoba \u00b7 decimal odds ~2.23 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +24% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1493065 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22482.23 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +6.6% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
        "primary_allowed": false,
        "primary_block_explain": {
          "entries": [
            {
              "key": "positive_ev",
              "label": "Consensus EV +6.6% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
              "ok": true
            },
            {
              "key": "gate",
              "label": "Execution confidence below 65",
              "ok": false
            }
          ],
          "lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
          "primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
          "subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
          "title": "Why not Primary?"
        },
        "primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +6.6% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration Clear \u2705 \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 6.8/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
        "primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +6.6% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: Clear \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 6.8/10 (display only)",
        "primary_gates": {
          "items": [
            {
              "key": "extreme_gap",
              "label": "Extreme gap",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "no"
            },
            {
              "key": "xg_calibration",
              "label": "xG calibration",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "ok"
            },
            {
              "key": "reliability",
              "label": "Rel",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "68 (\u226565)"
            },
            {
              "key": "execution",
              "label": "Exec",
              "ok": false,
              "value": "54 (\u226565)"
            },
            {
              "key": "alignment",
              "label": "Align",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "agree"
            },
            {
              "key": "consensus_ev",
              "label": "ConsEV",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "+6.6% (\u2265+5.0%)"
            },
            {
              "key": "top_pick",
              "label": "Pick",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "true"
            },
            {
              "key": "validation",
              "label": "Validation",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "true"
            }
          ],
          "passed": 7,
          "total": 8
        },
        "primary_type": null,
        "reasons": [
          "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Instituto C\u00f3rdoba).",
          "Decision strength: 6.8/10",
          "Execution confidence below 65",
          "Outlier price +24% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
        ],
        "reliability_score": 68,
        "speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
        "strength_v2_breakdown": [
          "Base decision score (v1)",
          "Reliability supports action",
          "Market aligns with model",
          "Consensus-line +EV",
          "Clear xG separation"
        ],
        "subline": "Selective consensus value may exist \u2014 below default Primary sizing bar.",
        "thresholds": {
          "extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
          "lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
          "lean_min_strength": 5.0,
          "min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
          "min_execution": 65,
          "min_reliability": 65,
          "min_strength": 7.0,
          "source": "db",
          "user_id": 2
        },
        "thresholds_source": "db",
        "thresholds_user_id": 2,
        "tier": "lean",
        "validation_ok": true,
        "value_context": {
          "consensus_ev": 0.0664,
          "consensus_ev_display": "+6.6%",
          "consensus_odds": 2.23,
          "disagreement_label": "Moderate",
          "disagreement_level": "moderate",
          "implied_prob": 0.4334,
          "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
          "model_prob": 0.5552,
          "raw_edge_display": "+12.2 percentage points",
          "raw_edge_pp": 12.2,
          "raw_implied_prob": 0.4484304932735426,
          "raw_signal_ev": 0.2381,
          "raw_signal_ev_display": "+23.8%"
        },
        "version": "v2.5",
        "xg_calibration": {
          "block_value_alert": false,
          "calibration_status": "ok",
          "deviation_pct": 14.8,
          "reasons": [
            "Clear xG separation gap=0.82"
          ],
          "recommended_action": "ok",
          "strength_delta": 0.5,
          "uplift_away": null,
          "uplift_home": null,
          "xg_separation": {
            "band": "clear",
            "block_value_alert": false,
            "separation_score": 5,
            "strength_delta": 0.5,
            "xg_gap": 0.82
          }
        }
      },
      "game_type": {
        "label_zh": "\u672a\u5206\u578b",
        "scoring_type": "neutral",
        "signals": {
          "btts_yes_prob": 0.423,
          "draw_prob": 0.2847,
          "max_1x2_prob": 0.5552,
          "over_prob": 0.399,
          "total_xg": 2.28,
          "under_prob": 0.601,
          "xg_diff": 0.82
        },
        "type": "neutral",
        "typing_weights_enabled": true
      },
      "hero_display_pick": null,
      "hero_mode": "default",
      "longshot_picks": [],
      "markets": {
        "1x2": {
          "consensus_odds": 2.23,
          "decision": "value_bet",
          "edge": 0.0448,
          "ev": 0.0664,
          "implied_prob": 0.4334,
          "max_ev_side": "away",
          "model_prob": 0.5552,
          "side": "away",
          "side_label": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba"
        },
        "btts": {
          "decision": "lean",
          "decision_layer": {
            "available": false
          },
          "edge": null,
          "ev": null,
          "implied_prob": null,
          "model_prob": 0.577,
          "side": "no",
          "value_side": "no"
        },
        "ou_2_5": {
          "decision": "lean",
          "decision_layer": {
            "available": false
          },
          "edge": null,
          "ev": null,
          "implied_prob": null,
          "model_prob": 0.601,
          "side": "under",
          "value_side": "under"
        }
      },
      "match_id": 1493065,
      "match_regime": {
        "action": "optional",
        "actionable": true,
        "clear_edge": false,
        "code": "thin_edge",
        "execution_line_key": null,
        "insight_line_key": null,
        "max_valid_ev": 0.0664,
        "min_ev": 0.02,
        "stake_mult": 0.25,
        "use_split_strip": false
      },
      "match_tier": "value_game",
      "no_clear_primary": false,
      "probabilities": {
        "away": 0.5552,
        "draw": 0.2847,
        "home": 0.1601
      },
      "reason_codes": [
        "model_summary"
      ],
      "secondary_pick": null,
      "secondary_picks": [],
      "show_betting_primary_label": false,
      "suppressed_primary": null,
      "teams": {
        "away": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
        "home": "Central C\u00f3rdoba"
      },
      "top_pick": {
        "composite_score": 0.036865,
        "decision": "value_bet",
        "ev": 0.0664,
        "implied_prob": 0.4334,
        "market": "1x2",
        "model_prob": 0.5552,
        "not_dominant": false,
        "primary_strength": "clear",
        "risk_band": "strong",
        "risk_tier": "primary",
        "side": "away",
        "side_label": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
        "slot": "primary",
        "speculative_primary": false
      },
      "valid_markets_count": 1,
      "value_context_1x2": {
        "consensus_ev": 0.0664,
        "consensus_ev_display": "+6.6%",
        "consensus_odds": 2.23,
        "disagreement_label": "Moderate",
        "disagreement_level": "moderate",
        "implied_prob": 0.4334,
        "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
        "model_prob": 0.5552,
        "raw_edge_display": "+12.2 percentage points",
        "raw_edge_pp": 12.2,
        "raw_implied_prob": 0.4484304932735426,
        "raw_signal_ev": 0.2381,
        "raw_signal_ev_display": "+23.8%"
      }
    }
  },
  "fixture_id": 1493065,
  "generated_at_utc": "2026-08-16T23:14:07.077932+00:00",
  "lang_id": "en"
}

Nhận dự đoán cao cấp cho Central Córdoba & Instituto Córdoba!

Mở khóa phân tích chuyên sâu, mẹo cá cược độc quyền và dự đoán trận đấu với dịch vụ đăng ký cao cấp của chúng tôi.

Đăng ký ngay
Quay lại Thống kê
Liga Profesional Argentina Liga Profesional Argentina — Bảng xếp hạng
# Đội Tr T H B Đ
1 Estudiantes La Plata 16 9 4 3 31
2 Boca Juniors 16 8 6 2 30
3 Vélez Sarsfield 16 7 7 2 28
4 Talleres Córdoba 16 7 5 4 26
5 Independiente 16 6 6 4 24
6 Lanús 16 6 6 4 24
7 San Lorenzo 16 5 7 4 22
8 Unión Santa Fe 16 5 6 5 21
9 Instituto Córdoba 16 6 3 7 21
10 Defensa y Justicia 16 4 7 5 19
11 Gimnasia Mendoza 16 5 4 7 19
12 Platense 16 3 7 6 16
13 Central Córdoba 16 4 4 8 16
14 Newell's Old Boys 16 3 6 7 15
15 Deportivo Riestra 16 1 8 7 11
# Đội Tr BT BB +/- Đ
1 Independiente 16 24 20 +4 24
2 Unión Santa Fe 16 24 20 +4 21
3 Boca Juniors 16 22 9 +13 30
4 Estudiantes La Plata 16 19 7 +12 31
5 Vélez Sarsfield 16 18 12 +6 28
6 Lanús 16 18 15 +3 24
7 Defensa y Justicia 16 18 21 -3 19
8 Talleres Córdoba 16 17 13 +4 26
9 Instituto Córdoba 16 17 17 0 21
10 Newell's Old Boys 16 15 27 -12 15
11 San Lorenzo 16 14 14 0 22
12 Gimnasia Mendoza 16 14 22 -8 19
13 Central Córdoba 16 11 21 -10 16
14 Platense 16 10 15 -5 16
15 Deportivo Riestra 16 5 12 -7 11
# Đội Tr xG xGC +/- Đ
1 Instituto Córdoba 16 14.2 5.0 +9.2 21
2 Defensa y Justicia 16 11.9 8.5 +3.4 19
3 Lanús 16 12.8 9.6 +3.2 24
4 Boca Juniors 16 9.2 6.0 +3.2 30
5 Unión Santa Fe 16 9.1 6.2 +2.9 21
6 Deportivo Riestra 16 9.7 7.2 +2.5 11
7 Estudiantes La Plata 16 12.1 9.8 +2.3 31
8 Gimnasia Mendoza 16 8.7 8.6 +0.1 19
9 Independiente 16 8.1 9.1 -1.0 24
10 Talleres Córdoba 16 10.4 13.0 -2.6 26
11 Newell's Old Boys 16 5.1 8.3 -3.2 15
12 Central Córdoba 16 9.4 13.1 -3.7 16
13 Platense 16 6.3 10.2 -3.9 16
14 San Lorenzo 16 4.8 8.7 -3.9 22
15 Vélez Sarsfield 16 6.1 10.1 -4.0 28