Market intelligence
Supporting read on how the prioritized closing feed moved versus the model — use after the Primary pick above.
Market briefing
The largest late implied swing on this feed was about 0.75 percentage points on 2 de Mayo (1X2) between PRE30 and PRE1.
The model still exceeds closing implied on SOL DE America (1X2) by about 15.2 percentage points — the clearest mispricing signal summarized on this page.
Model vs. closing implied
| Market |
Model % |
Closing impl. % |
Gap (pp) |
| 2 de Mayo (1X2) |
31.9 |
51.4 |
-19.5 |
| Draw (1X2) |
29.6 |
25.3 |
+4.2 |
| SOL DE America (1X2) |
38.5 |
23.2 |
+15.2 |
| Over 2.5 goals |
48.2 |
51.7 |
-3.5 |
| Under 2.5 goals |
51.8 |
48.3 |
+3.5 |
What this means
In plain terms: the model lands near 38.5% on SOL DE America (1X2), while the closing snapshot implied about 23.2%. The difference — about 15.2 percentage points — is the largest model-vs.-market gap highlighted on this page.
Quick definitions: “closing implied” is the probability for that outcome implied by the final captured odds (after a simple de-vig). “Gap (pp)” is the model percentage minus that implied value, in percentage points (pp).
Closing-window line move
Single prioritized bookmaker per snapshot (not all books). Capture path:
PRE30 → PRE1
· Book:
Pinnacle
Column tags in parentheses: Closing uses the first available snapshot in PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Early uses the first available in PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 that is not the same capture as Closing.
| Market |
Early (PRE30) |
Closing (PRE1) |
Implied Δ (pp) |
| 2 de Mayo (1X2) |
1.75 |
1.75 |
+0.8 |
| Draw (1X2) |
3.45 |
3.55 |
-0.3 |
| SOL DE America (1X2) |
3.75 |
3.87 |
-0.4 |
| Over 2.5 goals |
1.79 |
1.81 |
-0.0 |
| Under 2.5 goals |
1.92 |
1.94 |
+0.0 |