Statistics / Football / Peru. Liga Women / Flamengo FBC W vs UNSAAC W

Flamengo FBC W vs UNSAAC W Statistics & Analysis

⚽
Flamengo FBC W
Sep 19, 2026 - 18:00
1 1.32
0 1.28
xG Accuracy: 64%
⚽
UNSAAC W
Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Under 2.5 (1 goals) ✔ Correct
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes No ✖ Incorrect
  • 1X2 Flamengo FBC W Flamengo FBC W ✔ Correct
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 1-0 ✔ Correct

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Sep 14, 2026 · 03:31 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-8707694

Closing Odds 1.4
AI Fair Odds —
CLV +0.0%
Final Result Flamengo FBC W win · Flamengo FBC W 1–0 UNSAAC W
Prediction ✔ Correct
Decision Grade B-

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Market intelligence

Supporting read on how the prioritized closing feed moved versus the model — use after the Primary pick above.

Market briefing

Market remained largely stable before kickoff. No meaningful late implied-price shift was detected between PRE30 and PRE5 on the prioritized bookmaker snapshot.

Despite limited late movement, the model still prices Draw (1X2), UNSAAC W (1X2), Under 2.5 goals meaningfully above what those closing snapshots implied — that gap is a static “model vs. price” read, not a late steam or chase story.

The model still exceeds closing implied on UNSAAC W (1X2) by about 19.4 percentage points — the clearest mispricing signal summarized on this page.

Model vs. closing implied

Market Model % Closing impl. % Gap (pp)
Flamengo FBC W (1X2) 36.1 63.8 -27.7
Draw (1X2) 29.7 21.3 +8.4
UNSAAC W (1X2) 34.2 14.9 +19.4
Over 2.5 goals 48.2 60.0 -11.8
Under 2.5 goals 51.8 40.0 +11.8
What this means

In plain terms: the model lands near 34.2% on UNSAAC W (1X2), while the closing snapshot implied about 14.9%. The difference — about 19.4 percentage points — is the largest model-vs.-market gap highlighted on this page.

Quick definitions: “closing implied” is the probability for that outcome implied by the final captured odds (after a simple de-vig). “Gap (pp)” is the model percentage minus that implied value, in percentage points (pp).

Closing-window line move

Single prioritized bookmaker per snapshot (not all books). Capture path: PRE30 → PRE5 · Book: Bet365

Column tags in parentheses: Closing uses the first available snapshot in PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Early uses the first available in PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 that is not the same capture as Closing.

Detailed capture odds are folded below — movement was negligible on de-vig implied prices.

View full line-by-line capture table
Market Early (PRE30) Closing (PRE5) Implied Δ (pp)
Flamengo FBC W (1X2) 1.4 1.4 0.0
Draw (1X2) 4.2 4.2 0.0
UNSAAC W (1X2) 6.0 6.0 0.0
Over 2.5 goals 1.57 1.57 0.0
Under 2.5 goals 2.35 2.35 0.0

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Pre-match snapshot for this fixture.

  • League: Liga Women
  • Fixture: Flamengo FBC W vs UNSAAC W
  • Kickoff: 2026-09-19 18:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 36.1% · Draw 29.7% · Away 34.2%
  • xG (showing): Flamengo FBC W 1.32 — UNSAAC W 1.28 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
  • Value headline: At least one tracked line reaches the headline EV threshold — align with the hero / Primary card if shown.
  • Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 51.8% · Over 2.5 48.2%); BTTS Yes (Yes 54.5% · No 45.5%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS Yes
  • BTTS (model): Yes 54.5% · No 45.5%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (12.5%)

When book depth is thin or odds are missing, EV may be unavailable even though the model still prefers one side on totals or BTTS — wait for cleaner prices or skip.

If lines move materially, re-run generation or refresh — implied probabilities and any future EV readouts will change first.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: Wait - No Primary Bet

Outcome: Validated — Pre-match lean validated against the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 30, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for Flamengo FBC W & UNSAAC W!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Statistics
Liga Women Liga Women — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 U. de Deportes W 10 9 1 0 28
2 Atl. Andahuaylas W 10 8 1 1 25
3 Sporting Cristal W 10 7 0 3 21
4 Alianza Lima W 10 6 2 2 20
5 Yanapuma W 10 5 1 4 16
6 FBC Melgar W 10 4 2 4 14
7 Flamengo FBC W 10 3 2 5 11
8 Defensores W 10 2 1 7 7
9 UNSAAC W 10 1 3 6 6
10 Killas W 10 1 2 7 5
11 Carlos Mannucci W 10 1 1 8 4
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 U. de Deportes W 10 55 4 +51 28
2 Sporting Cristal W 10 30 9 +21 21
3 Alianza Lima W 10 26 7 +19 20
4 Flamengo FBC W 10 16 21 -5 11
5 FBC Melgar W 10 15 14 +1 14
6 Yanapuma W 10 15 21 -6 16
7 Atl. Andahuaylas W 10 14 8 +6 25
8 Killas W 10 14 26 -12 5
9 Defensores W 10 11 29 -18 7
10 UNSAAC W 10 7 25 -18 6
11 Carlos Mannucci W 10 4 43 -39 4