CDM vs Dragones de Oaxaca Statistics & Analysis

CDM

Sep 13, 2026 - 22:00

1 1.32

1 1.28

xG Accuracy: 85%

Dragones de Oaxaca

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

Market Prediction Result Outcome
Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Under 2.5 (2 goals) ✔ Correct
Both Teams To Score BTTS No Yes ✖ Incorrect
1X2 CDM Draw ✖ Incorrect
Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 1-1 ✔ Correct

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Sep 07, 2026 · 02:27 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-7461693

Closing Odds 3.3

AI Fair Odds —

CLV +0.0%

Final Result Draw · CDM 1–1 Dragones de Oaxaca

Prediction ✖ Missed

Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

Primary Bets ROI (180d): +37.5%

Market intelligence

Supporting read on how the prioritized closing feed moved versus the model — use after the Primary pick above.

Market briefing

Market remained largely stable before kickoff. No meaningful late implied-price shift was detected between PRE30 and PRE1 on the prioritized bookmaker snapshot.

Despite limited late movement, the model still prices Draw (1X2), Under 2.5 goals meaningfully above what those closing snapshots implied — that gap is a static “model vs. price” read, not a late steam or chase story.

The model still exceeds closing implied on Under 2.5 goals by about 3.1 percentage points — the clearest mispricing signal summarized on this page.

Model vs. closing implied

Market	Model %	Closing impl. %	Gap (pp)
CDM (1X2)	36.1	36.5	-0.4
Draw (1X2)	29.7	27.1	+2.6
Dragones de Oaxaca (1X2)	34.2	36.5	-2.2
Over 2.5 goals	48.2	51.3	-3.1
Under 2.5 goals	51.8	48.7	+3.1

What this means

In plain terms: the model lands near 51.8% on Under 2.5 goals, while the closing snapshot implied about 48.7%. The difference — about 3.1 percentage points — is the largest model-vs.-market gap highlighted on this page.

Quick definitions: “closing implied” is the probability for that outcome implied by the final captured odds (after a simple de-vig). “Gap (pp)” is the model percentage minus that implied value, in percentage points (pp).

Closing-window line move

Single prioritized bookmaker per snapshot (not all books). Capture path: PRE30 → PRE1 · Book: Bet365

Column tags in parentheses: Closing uses the first available snapshot in PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Early uses the first available in PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 that is not the same capture as Closing.

Detailed capture odds are folded below — movement was negligible on de-vig implied prices.

View full line-by-line capture table

Market	Early (PRE30)	Closing (PRE1)
CDM (1X2)	2.45	2.45
Draw (1X2)	3.3	3.3
Dragones de Oaxaca (1X2)	2.45	2.45
Over 2.5 goals	1.85	1.85
Under 2.5 goals	1.95	1.95

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Below is a compact, numbers-first snapshot aligned with the same engine as the cards above.

League: Liga Premier Serie A
Fixture: CDM vs Dragones de Oaxaca
Kickoff: 2026-09-13 22:00:00
1X2 (model): Home 36.1% · Draw 29.7% · Away 34.2%
xG (showing): CDM 1.32 — Dragones de Oaxaca 1.28 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
Value headline: None (actionable) — best tracked EV is about +1.0%, still below the +2.0% minimum for a headline / default stake (no default bet).
Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 51.8% · Over 2.5 48.2%); BTTS Yes (Yes 54.5% · No 45.5%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS No
BTTS (model): Yes 54.5% · No 45.5%
Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (12.5%)

When book depth is thin or odds are missing, EV may be unavailable even though the model still prefers one side on totals or BTTS — wait for cleaner prices or skip.

Prefer skipping to over-staking when the engine is honest about missing edge.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: No Primary Bet

Outcome: Missed — Pre-match 1X2 lean did not match the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 15, 2026 (UTC)

Explore More Predictions Content

Get Premium Predictions for CDM & Dragones de Oaxaca!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now

Back to Statistics

Liga Premier Serie A — Standings

#	TEAM	MP	W	D	L	PTS
1	La Tribu de Cd. Juarez	2	2	0	0	7
1	Dragones de Oaxaca	2	2	0	0	7
2	Acatlan	3	2	0	1	6
2	CDM	2	2	0	0	6
3	Vaqueros Reynosa	2	2	0	0	6
3	Artesanos Metepec	2	2	0	0	6
4	Mineros de Fresnillo	3	1	2	0	5
4	Guerreros del Pacifico	1	1	0	0	3
5	FC Santiago	3	1	0	2	3
5	Real Refineros	2	1	0	1	3
6	Atlético Saltillo	2	1	0	1	3
6	Delfines Coatzacoalcos	2	0	1	1	1
7	Correcaminos UAT II	1	0	1	0	1
7	Halcones Negros	2	0	1	1	1
8	Real Apodaca	3	0	1	2	1
8	Calor de San Pedro	1	0	0	1	0
9	Héroes de Zaci	1	0	0	1	0
9	Ciervos	2	0	0	2	0
10	Guerreros	2	0	0	2	0
10	Cañoneros Marina	2	0	0	2	0

#	TEAM	MP	GS	GC	+/-	PTS
1	CDM	2	10	1	+9	6
2	La Tribu de Cd. Juarez	2	8	1	+7	7
3	Acatlan	3	7	5	+2	6
4	Artesanos Metepec	2	5	1	+4	6
5	Vaqueros Reynosa	2	5	3	+2	6
6	Dragones de Oaxaca	2	4	1	+3	7
7	Atlético Saltillo	2	4	6	-2	3
8	FC Santiago	3	3	3	0	3
9	Real Apodaca	3	3	7	-4	1
10	Guerreros	2	3	7	-4	0
11	Mineros de Fresnillo	3	2	0	+2	5
12	Guerreros del Pacifico	1	2	0	+2	3
13	Real Refineros	2	2	2	0	3
14	Delfines Coatzacoalcos	2	1	2	-1	1
15	Halcones Negros	2	1	2	-1	1
16	Correcaminos UAT II	1	0	0	0	1
17	Calor de San Pedro	1	0	3	-3	0
18	Héroes de Zaci	1	0	3	-3	0
19	Ciervos	2	0	4	-4	0
20	Cañoneros Marina	2	0	9	-9	0