Statistics / Football / World. AFC Champions League / Al Ain vs Al-Nassr

Al Ain vs Al-Nassr Statistics & Analysis

Al Ain Al Ain
Sep 15, 2026 - 16:00
4 1.27
0 1.67
xG Accuracy: 30%
Al-Nassr Al-Nassr
Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (4 goals) ✖ Incorrect
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes No ✖ Incorrect
  • 1X2 Al-Nassr Al Ain ✖ Incorrect
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-2, 0-1, 0-2, 2-1 4-0 ✖ Incorrect

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Sep 09, 2026 · 02:23 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-7702424

Closing Odds 1.9
AI Fair Odds —
CLV +0.0%
Final Result Al Ain win · Al Ain 4–0 Al-Nassr
Prediction ✖ Missed
Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Market intelligence

Supporting read on how the prioritized closing feed moved versus the model — use after the Primary pick above.

Market briefing

Market remained largely stable before kickoff. No meaningful late implied-price shift was detected between PRE30 and PRE1 on the prioritized bookmaker snapshot.

Despite limited late movement, the model still prices Draw (1X2), Under 2.5 goals meaningfully above what those closing snapshots implied — that gap is a static “model vs. price” read, not a late steam or chase story.

The model still exceeds closing implied on Draw (1X2) by about 4.2 percentage points — the clearest mispricing signal summarized on this page.

Model vs. closing implied

Market Model % Closing impl. % Gap (pp)
Al Ain (1X2) 27.7 27.2 +0.5
Draw (1X2) 27.0 22.7 +4.2
Al-Nassr (1X2) 45.3 50.0 -4.7
Over 2.5 goals 56.3 58.6 -2.3
Under 2.5 goals 43.7 41.4 +2.3
What this means

In plain terms: the model lands near 27.0% on Draw (1X2), while the closing snapshot implied about 22.7%. The difference — about 4.2 percentage points — is the largest model-vs.-market gap highlighted on this page.

Quick definitions: “closing implied” is the probability for that outcome implied by the final captured odds (after a simple de-vig). “Gap (pp)” is the model percentage minus that implied value, in percentage points (pp).

Closing-window line move

Single prioritized bookmaker per snapshot (not all books). Capture path: PRE30 → PRE1 · Book: Pinnacle

Column tags in parentheses: Closing uses the first available snapshot in PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Early uses the first available in PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 that is not the same capture as Closing.

Detailed capture odds are folded below — movement was negligible on de-vig implied prices.

View full line-by-line capture table
Market Early (PRE30) Closing (PRE1) Implied Δ (pp)
Al Ain (1X2) 3.49 3.49 0.0
Draw (1X2) 4.18 4.18 0.0
Al-Nassr (1X2) 1.9 1.9 0.0
Over 2.5 goals 1.62 1.62 0.0
Under 2.5 goals 2.29 2.29 0.0

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Pre-match snapshot for this fixture.

  • League: AFC Champions League
  • Fixture: Al Ain vs Al-Nassr
  • Kickoff: 2026-09-15 16:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 27.7% · Draw 27.0% · Away 45.3%
  • xG (showing): Al Ain 1.27 — Al-Nassr 1.67 (total xG ≈ 2.94)
  • Value headline: None (actionable) — best tracked EV is about +0.5%, still below the +2.0% minimum for a headline / default stake (no default bet).
  • Structural leans (not bets): Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS Yes
  • BTTS (model): Yes N/A · No N/A
  • Correct score (top bin): N/A

Saying “no value” on a snapshot is a feature, not a bug: it protects readers from forcing a play when the edge is not there.

Most likely correct score stays a low-probability tail: use it for context, not as a must-bet story.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: No Primary Bet

Outcome: Missed — Pre-match 1X2 lean did not match the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 29, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for Al Ain & Al-Nassr!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Statistics
AFC Champions League AFC Champions League — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Al Ain 1 1 0 0 3
2 Esteghlal FC 1 1 0 0 3
3 Al-Qadisiyah FC 1 1 0 0 3
4 Al-Hilal Saudi FC 1 1 0 0 3
5 Shabab Al Ahli Dubai 1 1 0 0 3
6 Neftchi 1 1 0 0 3
7 Al-Ittihad FC 1 0 1 0 1
8 Al Shamal 1 0 1 0 1
9 Pakhtakor 1 0 1 0 1
10 Al-Ahli Jeddah 1 0 1 0 1
11 Al-Wasl FC 1 0 0 1 0
12 Al-Gharafa 1 0 0 1 0
13 Al Quwa Al Jawiya 1 0 0 1 0
14 Tractor Sazi 1 0 0 1 0
15 Al Sadd 1 0 0 1 0
16 Al-Nassr 1 0 0 1 0
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Al Ain 1 4 0 +4 3
2 Esteghlal FC 1 3 0 +3 3
3 Al-Qadisiyah FC 1 2 1 +1 3
4 Al-Hilal Saudi FC 1 2 1 +1 3
5 Shabab Al Ahli Dubai 1 1 0 +1 3
6 Neftchi 1 1 0 +1 3
7 Al-Ittihad FC 1 1 1 0 1
8 Al Shamal 1 1 1 0 1
9 Pakhtakor 1 1 1 0 1
10 Al-Ahli Jeddah 1 1 1 0 1
11 Al-Wasl FC 1 1 2 -1 0
12 Al-Gharafa 1 1 2 -1 0
13 Al Quwa Al Jawiya 1 0 1 -1 0
14 Tractor Sazi 1 0 1 -1 0
15 Al Sadd 1 0 3 -3 0
16 Al-Nassr 1 0 4 -4 0
# TEAM MP xG xGC +/- PTS
1 Al Ain 1 — — — 3
2 Esteghlal FC 1 — — — 3
3 Al-Qadisiyah FC 1 — — — 3
4 Al-Hilal Saudi FC 1 — — — 3
5 Shabab Al Ahli Dubai 1 — — — 3
6 Neftchi 1 — — — 3
7 Al-Ittihad FC 1 — — — 1
8 Al Shamal 1 — — — 1
9 Pakhtakor 1 — — — 1
10 Al-Ahli Jeddah 1 — — — 1
11 Al-Wasl FC 1 — — — 0
12 Al-Gharafa 1 — — — 0
13 Al Quwa Al Jawiya 1 — — — 0
14 Tractor Sazi 1 — — — 0
15 Al Sadd 1 — — — 0
16 Al-Nassr 1 — — — 0