Statistics / Football / Angola. Girabola / Kabuscorp vs CD Lunda-Sul

Kabuscorp vs CD Lunda-Sul Statistics & Analysis

Kabuscorp Kabuscorp
Aug 29, 2026 - 14:30
1 1.30
1 1.30
xG Accuracy: 85%
CD Lunda-Sul CD Lunda-Sul
Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Under 2.5 (2 goals) ✔ Correct
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
  • 1X2 Kabuscorp Draw ✖ Incorrect
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 0-1, 1-0, 1-2, 2-1 1-1 ✔ Correct

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Aug 22, 2026 · 02:01 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-4921774

Closing Odds 1.73
AI Fair Odds —
CLV +0.0%
Final Result Draw · Kabuscorp 1–1 CD Lunda-Sul
Prediction ✖ Missed
Decision Grade C

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Market intelligence

Supporting read on how the prioritized closing feed moved versus the model — use after the Primary pick above.

Market briefing

Market remained largely stable before kickoff. No meaningful late implied-price shift was detected between PRE30 and PRE1 on the prioritized bookmaker snapshot.

Despite limited late movement, the model still prices CD Lunda-Sul (1X2), Over 2.5 goals meaningfully above what those closing snapshots implied — that gap is a static “model vs. price” read, not a late steam or chase story.

The model still exceeds closing implied on CD Lunda-Sul (1X2) by about 16.2 percentage points — the clearest mispricing signal summarized on this page.

Model vs. closing implied

Market Model % Closing impl. % Gap (pp)
Kabuscorp (1X2) 35.2 52.0 -16.8
Draw (1X2) 29.6 29.0 +0.6
CD Lunda-Sul (1X2) 35.2 18.9 +16.2
Over 2.5 goals 48.2 35.5 +12.7
Under 2.5 goals 51.8 64.5 -12.7
What this means

In plain terms: the model lands near 35.2% on CD Lunda-Sul (1X2), while the closing snapshot implied about 18.9%. The difference — about 16.2 percentage points — is the largest model-vs.-market gap highlighted on this page.

Quick definitions: “closing implied” is the probability for that outcome implied by the final captured odds (after a simple de-vig). “Gap (pp)” is the model percentage minus that implied value, in percentage points (pp).

Closing-window line move

Single prioritized bookmaker per snapshot (not all books). Capture path: PRE30 → PRE1 · Book: Bet365

Column tags in parentheses: Closing uses the first available snapshot in PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Early uses the first available in PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 that is not the same capture as Closing.

Detailed capture odds are folded below — movement was negligible on de-vig implied prices.

View full line-by-line capture table
Market Early (PRE30) Closing (PRE1) Implied Δ (pp)
Kabuscorp (1X2) 1.73 1.73 0.0
Draw (1X2) 3.1 3.1 0.0
CD Lunda-Sul (1X2) 4.75 4.75 0.0
Over 2.5 goals 2.62 2.62 0.0
Under 2.5 goals 1.44 1.44 0.0

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Pre-match snapshot for this fixture.

  • League: Girabola
  • Fixture: Kabuscorp vs CD Lunda-Sul
  • Kickoff: 2026-08-29 14:30:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 35.2% · Draw 29.6% · Away 35.2%
  • xG (showing): Kabuscorp 1.3 — CD Lunda-Sul 1.3 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
  • Value headline: At least one tracked line reaches the headline EV threshold — align with the hero / Primary card if shown.
  • Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 51.8% · Over 2.5 48.2%); BTTS Yes (Yes 54.5% · No 45.5%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Over 2.5; BTTS Yes
  • BTTS (model): Yes 54.5% · No 45.5%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (12.6%)

The decision block shows no default Primary: Primary needs consensus EV ≥ +5.0% plus strength/reliability/calibration gates. A separate Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only). Lean labels are directional only — not bankroll-sized recommendations.

Prefer skipping to over-staking when the engine is honest about missing edge.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: No Primary Bet

Outcome: Missed — Pre-match 1X2 lean did not match the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 28, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for Kabuscorp & CD Lunda-Sul!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Statistics
Girabola Girabola — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Wiliete 5 5 0 0 15
2 1º de Agosto 5 4 1 0 13
3 Onze Bravos 5 4 0 1 12
4 Petro de Luanda 4 3 1 0 10
5 Interclube 5 3 0 2 9
6 Desportivo Huíla 5 3 0 2 9
7 1º de Maio 5 2 1 2 7
8 Recreativo do Libolo 5 2 0 3 6
9 Kabuscorp 4 1 2 1 5
10 CD Lunda-Sul 5 1 2 2 5
11 Recreativo da Caála 5 1 1 3 4
12 FC Luanda 5 1 1 3 4
13 São Salvador 5 1 1 3 4
14 Sagrada Esperança 3 1 0 2 3
15 Sporting de Cabinda 5 0 2 3 2
16 Académica do Lobito 5 0 0 5 0
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Wiliete 5 12 1 +11 15
2 1º de Agosto 5 9 5 +4 13
3 Onze Bravos 5 7 2 +5 12
4 Petro de Luanda 4 6 0 +6 10
5 Interclube 5 6 4 +2 9
6 1º de Maio 5 6 5 +1 7
7 Desportivo Huíla 5 5 4 +1 9
8 Recreativo da Caála 5 5 7 -2 4
9 FC Luanda 5 5 8 -3 4
10 Recreativo do Libolo 5 5 10 -5 6
11 CD Lunda-Sul 5 4 5 -1 5
12 Sagrada Esperança 3 4 6 -2 3
13 Kabuscorp 4 3 3 0 5
14 Sporting de Cabinda 5 3 8 -5 2
15 São Salvador 5 2 5 -3 4
16 Académica do Lobito 5 0 9 -9 0
Girabola Angola. Girabola Predictions