Statistics / Football / Indonesia. Liga 1 / Persijap vs Pusamania Borneo

Persijap vs Pusamania Borneo Statistics & Analysis

Persijap Persijap
Sep 12, 2026 - 12:00
0 1.17
1 1.43
xG Accuracy: 64%
Pusamania Borneo Pusamania Borneo
Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Under 2.5 (1 goals) ✔ Correct
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes No ✖ Incorrect
  • 1X2 Pusamania Borneo Pusamania Borneo ✔ Correct
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 0-1, 1-2, 1-0, 0-2 0-1 ✔ Correct

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Sep 07, 2026 · 01:14 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-7428898

Closing Odds 1.84
AI Fair Odds —
CLV +0.0%
Final Result Pusamania Borneo win · Persijap 0–1 Pusamania Borneo
Prediction ✔ Correct
Decision Grade B-

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Market intelligence

Supporting read on how the prioritized closing feed moved versus the model — use after the Primary pick above.

Market briefing

Market remained largely stable before kickoff. No meaningful late implied-price shift was detected between PRE30 and PRE5 on the prioritized bookmaker snapshot.

Despite limited late movement, the model still prices Persijap (1X2), Draw (1X2), Under 2.5 goals meaningfully above what those closing snapshots implied — that gap is a static “model vs. price” read, not a late steam or chase story.

The model still exceeds closing implied on Persijap (1X2) by about 6.9 percentage points — the clearest mispricing signal summarized on this page.

Model vs. closing implied

Market Model % Closing impl. % Gap (pp)
Persijap (1X2) 29.3 22.4 +6.9
Draw (1X2) 29.4 26.2 +3.1
Pusamania Borneo (1X2) 41.4 51.4 -10.0
Over 2.5 goals 48.2 50.0 -1.8
Under 2.5 goals 51.8 50.0 +1.8
What this means

In plain terms: the model lands near 29.3% on Persijap (1X2), while the closing snapshot implied about 22.4%. The difference — about 6.9 percentage points — is the largest model-vs.-market gap highlighted on this page.

Quick definitions: “closing implied” is the probability for that outcome implied by the final captured odds (after a simple de-vig). “Gap (pp)” is the model percentage minus that implied value, in percentage points (pp).

Closing-window line move

Single prioritized bookmaker per snapshot (not all books). Capture path: PRE30 → PRE5 · Book: Pinnacle

Column tags in parentheses: Closing uses the first available snapshot in PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Early uses the first available in PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 that is not the same capture as Closing.

Detailed capture odds are folded below — movement was negligible on de-vig implied prices.

View full line-by-line capture table
Market Early (PRE30) Closing (PRE5) Implied Δ (pp)
Persijap (1X2) 4.22 4.22 0.0
Draw (1X2) 3.6 3.6 0.0
Pusamania Borneo (1X2) 1.84 1.84 0.0
Over 2.5 goals 1.91 1.91 0.0
Under 2.5 goals 1.91 1.91 0.0

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Quick read on how the model reads this matchup.

  • League: Liga 1
  • Fixture: Persijap vs Pusamania Borneo
  • Kickoff: 2026-09-12 12:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 29.3% · Draw 29.4% · Away 41.4%
  • xG (showing): Persijap 1.17 — Pusamania Borneo 1.43 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
  • Value headline: None — no positive EV on tracked lines at current best prices (same as the decision block: no default bet).
  • Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 51.8% · Over 2.5 48.2%); BTTS Yes (Yes 54.1% · No 45.9%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS Yes
  • BTTS (model): Yes 54.1% · No 45.9%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (12.4%)

The decision block shows no default Primary: Primary needs consensus EV ≥ +5.0% plus strength/reliability/calibration gates. A separate Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only). Lean labels are directional only — not bankroll-sized recommendations.

If lines move materially, re-run generation or refresh — implied probabilities and any future EV readouts will change first.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: No Primary Bet

Outcome: Validated — Pre-match lean validated against the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 29, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for Persijap & Pusamania Borneo!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Statistics
Liga 1 Liga 1 — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Dewa United 4 3 1 0 10
2 Persepam Madura Utd 3 3 0 0 9
3 Persija 3 3 0 0 9
4 Bali United 3 2 0 1 6
5 Persib Bandung 3 2 0 1 6
6 Pusamania Borneo 4 2 0 2 6
7 Arema FC 3 1 2 0 5
8 Bhayangkara FC 3 1 2 0 5
9 Persita 3 1 2 0 5
10 Persebaya Surabaya 3 1 2 0 5
11 Persik Kediri 3 1 1 1 4
12 PSM Makassar 3 0 2 1 2
13 Garudayaksa 3 0 2 1 2
14 PSIM Yogyakarta 3 0 1 2 1
15 PSS Sleman 3 0 0 3 0
16 Persijap 3 0 0 3 0
17 Malut United 3 0 1 2 -1
18 Adhyaksa 3 0 0 3 -2
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Dewa United 4 8 4 +4 10
2 Arema FC 3 8 4 +4 5
3 Persepam Madura Utd 3 7 2 +5 9
4 Bali United 3 6 3 +3 6
5 Persib Bandung 3 6 4 +2 6
6 Persita 3 6 5 +1 5
7 PSM Makassar 3 6 8 -2 2
8 Bhayangkara FC 3 5 3 +2 5
9 Persija 3 4 1 +3 9
10 Persebaya Surabaya 3 3 2 +1 5
11 Persik Kediri 3 3 2 +1 4
12 Pusamania Borneo 4 3 4 -1 6
13 Malut United 3 3 5 -2 -1
14 PSS Sleman 3 3 7 -4 0
15 Garudayaksa 3 2 4 -2 2
16 PSIM Yogyakarta 3 2 4 -2 1
17 Persijap 3 1 5 -4 0
18 Adhyaksa 3 1 10 -9 -2