Statistics / Football / Nigeria. NPFL / Ikorodu City vs Ranchers Bees

Ikorodu City vs Ranchers Bees Statistics & Analysis

Ikorodu City Ikorodu City
Aug 30, 2026 - 15:00
3 1.38
1 1.22
xG Accuracy: 60%
⚽
Ranchers Bees
Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (4 goals) ✖ Incorrect
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
  • 1X2 Ikorodu City Ikorodu City ✔ Correct
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 3-1 ✖ Incorrect

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Aug 24, 2026 · 02:08 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-5298597

Closing Odds 1.43
AI Fair Odds —
CLV +0.0%
Final Result Ikorodu City win · Ikorodu City 3–1 Ranchers Bees
Prediction ✔ Correct
Decision Grade B-

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Market intelligence

Supporting read on how the prioritized closing feed moved versus the model — use after the Primary pick above.

Market briefing

Market remained largely stable before kickoff. No meaningful late implied-price shift was detected between PRE30 and PRE1 on the prioritized bookmaker snapshot.

Despite limited late movement, the model still prices Draw (1X2), Ranchers Bees (1X2), Over 2.5 goals meaningfully above what those closing snapshots implied — that gap is a static “model vs. price” read, not a late steam or chase story.

The model still exceeds closing implied on Ranchers Bees (1X2) by about 17.3 percentage points — the clearest mispricing signal summarized on this page.

Model vs. closing implied

Market Model % Closing impl. % Gap (pp)
Ikorodu City (1X2) 39.0 62.2 -23.2
Draw (1X2) 29.5 23.6 +6.0
Ranchers Bees (1X2) 31.5 14.2 +17.3
Over 2.5 goals 48.2 45.3 +2.9
Under 2.5 goals 51.8 54.7 -2.9
What this means

In plain terms: the model lands near 31.5% on Ranchers Bees (1X2), while the closing snapshot implied about 14.2%. The difference — about 17.3 percentage points — is the largest model-vs.-market gap highlighted on this page.

Quick definitions: “closing implied” is the probability for that outcome implied by the final captured odds (after a simple de-vig). “Gap (pp)” is the model percentage minus that implied value, in percentage points (pp).

Closing-window line move

Single prioritized bookmaker per snapshot (not all books). Capture path: PRE30 → PRE1 · Book: Pinnacle

Column tags in parentheses: Closing uses the first available snapshot in PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Early uses the first available in PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 that is not the same capture as Closing.

Detailed capture odds are folded below — movement was negligible on de-vig implied prices.

View full line-by-line capture table
Market Early (PRE30) Closing (PRE1) Implied Δ (pp)
Ikorodu City (1X2) 1.43 1.43 0.0
Draw (1X2) 3.77 3.77 0.0
Ranchers Bees (1X2) 6.25 6.25 0.0
Over 2.5 goals 2.03 2.03 0.0
Under 2.5 goals 1.68 1.68 0.0

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Quick read on how the model reads this matchup.

  • League: NPFL
  • Fixture: Ikorodu City vs Ranchers Bees
  • Kickoff: 2026-08-30 15:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 39.0% · Draw 29.5% · Away 31.5%
  • xG (showing): Ikorodu City 1.38 — Ranchers Bees 1.22 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
  • Value headline: At least one tracked line reaches the headline EV threshold — align with the hero / Primary card if shown.
  • Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 51.8% · Over 2.5 48.2%); BTTS Yes (Yes 54.4% · No 45.6%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Over 2.5; BTTS Yes
  • BTTS (model): Yes 54.4% · No 45.6%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (12.5%)

Saying “no value” on a snapshot is a feature, not a bug: it protects readers from forcing a play when the edge is not there.

If lines move materially, re-run generation or refresh — implied probabilities and any future EV readouts will change first.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: Wait - No Primary Bet

Outcome: Validated — Pre-match lean validated against the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 29, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for Ikorodu City & Ranchers Bees!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Statistics
NPFL NPFL — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Barau FC 6 3 3 0 12
2 Rivers United 4 3 1 0 10
3 Enugu Rangers 4 3 1 0 10
4 Doma United 5 3 1 1 10
5 Bendel Insurance 5 3 0 2 9
6 Kano Pillars 4 2 2 0 8
7 Plateau United 5 2 2 1 8
8 Kwara United 5 2 1 2 7
9 Sporting Lagos 5 2 1 2 7
10 Shooting Stars 3 2 0 1 6
11 Ranchers Bees 5 2 0 3 6
12 Ikorodu City 4 1 2 1 5
13 Niger Tornadoes 5 1 2 2 5
14 Abia Warriors 5 1 2 2 5
15 Warri Wolves 4 1 1 2 4
16 Nasarawa United 5 1 1 3 4
17 Inter Lagos 5 1 1 3 4
18 Katsina United 4 1 1 2 4
19 Kun Khalifat FC 5 0 2 3 2
20 Enyimba 4 0 0 4 0
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Rivers United 4 10 1 +9 10
2 Kano Pillars 4 10 6 +4 8
3 Barau FC 6 9 3 +6 12
4 Bendel Insurance 5 9 7 +2 9
5 Enugu Rangers 4 8 4 +4 10
6 Doma United 5 8 6 +2 10
7 Ranchers Bees 5 8 8 0 6
8 Kwara United 5 7 5 +2 7
9 Plateau United 5 7 6 +1 8
10 Sporting Lagos 5 7 7 0 7
11 Ikorodu City 4 6 5 +1 5
12 Shooting Stars 3 5 4 +1 6
13 Niger Tornadoes 5 5 6 -1 5
14 Nasarawa United 5 5 8 -3 4
15 Abia Warriors 5 4 8 -4 5
16 Kun Khalifat FC 5 4 13 -9 2
17 Inter Lagos 5 3 7 -4 4
18 Enyimba 4 3 8 -5 0
19 Warri Wolves 4 2 4 -2 4
20 Katsina United 4 2 6 -4 4
NPFL Nigeria. NPFL Predictions