Statistics / Football / Spain. Tercera División RFEF - Group 6 / Eldense B vs Torrent

Eldense B vs Torrent Statistics & Analysis

⚽
Eldense B
Sep 26, 2026 - 14:00
3 1.32
1 1.28
xG Accuracy: 58%
Torrent Torrent
Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Over 2.5 (4 goals) ✔ Correct
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
  • 1X2 Eldense B Eldense B ✔ Correct
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 3-1 ✖ Incorrect

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Sep 21, 2026 · 02:04 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-10104761

Closing Odds 3.02
AI Fair Odds —
CLV +0.0%
Final Result Eldense B win · Eldense B 3–1 Torrent
Prediction ✔ Correct
Decision Grade A

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Market intelligence

Supporting read on how the prioritized closing feed moved versus the model — use after the Primary pick above.

Market briefing

Market remained largely stable before kickoff. No meaningful late implied-price shift was detected between PRE30 and PRE5 on the prioritized bookmaker snapshot.

Despite limited late movement, the model still prices Eldense B (1X2), Over 2.5 goals meaningfully above what those closing snapshots implied — that gap is a static “model vs. price” read, not a late steam or chase story.

The model still exceeds closing implied on Over 2.5 goals by about 9.4 percentage points — the clearest mispricing signal summarized on this page.

Model vs. closing implied

Market Model % Closing impl. % Gap (pp)
Eldense B (1X2) 36.1 29.9 +6.2
Draw (1X2) 29.7 31.9 -2.3
Torrent (1X2) 34.2 38.1 -3.9
Over 2.5 goals 48.2 38.8 +9.4
Under 2.5 goals 51.8 61.2 -9.4
What this means

In plain terms: the model lands near 48.2% on Over 2.5 goals, while the closing snapshot implied about 38.8%. The difference — about 9.4 percentage points — is the largest model-vs.-market gap highlighted on this page.

Quick definitions: “closing implied” is the probability for that outcome implied by the final captured odds (after a simple de-vig). “Gap (pp)” is the model percentage minus that implied value, in percentage points (pp).

Closing-window line move

Single prioritized bookmaker per snapshot (not all books). Capture path: PRE30 → PRE5 · Book: Pinnacle

Column tags in parentheses: Closing uses the first available snapshot in PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Early uses the first available in PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 that is not the same capture as Closing.

Detailed capture odds are folded below — movement was negligible on de-vig implied prices.

View full line-by-line capture table
Market Early (PRE30) Closing (PRE5) Implied Δ (pp)
Eldense B (1X2) 3.02 3.02 0.0
Draw (1X2) 2.83 2.83 0.0
Torrent (1X2) 2.37 2.37 0.0
Over 2.5 goals 2.38 2.38 0.0
Under 2.5 goals 1.51 1.51 0.0

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Below is a compact, numbers-first snapshot aligned with the same engine as the cards above.

  • League: Tercera División RFEF - Group 6
  • Fixture: Eldense B vs Torrent
  • Kickoff: 2026-09-26 14:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 36.1% · Draw 29.7% · Away 34.2%
  • xG (showing): Eldense B 1.32 — Torrent 1.28 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
  • Best +EV line (same label as hero card when Primary thresholds are not met): Over 2.5 goals
  • Model: 48.2% · Implied: 39.4% · Probability edge: +8.8 pts · Est. EV: +14.7%
  • BTTS (model): Yes 54.5% · No 45.5%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (12.5%)

Use the cards for tiering; this text only restates the same inputs in narrative form.

1X2 can look balanced even when side markets show clearer structure.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: No Primary Bet

Outcome: Validated — Pre-match lean validated against the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 29, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for Eldense B & Torrent!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Statistics
Tercera División RFEF - Group 6 Tercera División RFEF - Group 6 — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Villarreal III 4 3 0 1 9
2 Eldense B 4 2 2 0 8
3 Torrent 4 2 1 1 7
4 Levante II 4 2 1 1 7
5 Vall de Uxó 3 2 1 0 7
6 Hércules II 4 2 1 1 7
7 Crevillente 3 1 2 0 5
8 Acero 4 1 2 1 5
9 Buñol 3 1 2 0 5
10 Roda 3 1 1 1 4
11 Soneja 3 1 1 1 4
12 Saguntino 3 1 0 2 3
13 Ontinyent 1931 3 1 0 2 3
14 SC Torrevieja 3 1 0 2 3
15 Atzeneta 4 0 2 2 2
16 Utiel 3 0 2 1 2
17 Jove Español 4 0 2 2 2
18 Torrellano 3 0 0 3 0
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Torrent 4 8 5 +3 7
2 Hércules II 4 7 5 +2 7
3 Villarreal III 4 6 3 +3 9
4 Eldense B 4 5 2 +3 8
5 Levante II 4 5 2 +3 7
6 Vall de Uxó 3 4 1 +3 7
7 Crevillente 3 4 3 +1 5
8 Acero 4 4 3 +1 5
9 Roda 3 4 4 0 4
10 Soneja 3 4 5 -1 4
11 Jove Español 4 4 9 -5 2
12 Buñol 3 3 2 +1 5
13 Saguntino 3 2 3 -1 3
14 Ontinyent 1931 3 2 4 -2 3
15 Atzeneta 4 2 4 -2 2
16 SC Torrevieja 3 2 5 -3 3
17 Torrellano 3 2 6 -4 0
18 Utiel 3 1 3 -2 2
Tercera División RFEF - Group 6 Spain. Tercera División RFEF - Group 6 Predictions