Statistics / Football / England. WSL Cup / Liverpool W vs Sunderland W

Liverpool W vs Sunderland W Statistics & Analysis

Sep 23, 2026 - 18:00
4 1.42
2 1.18
xG Accuracy: 39%
Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (6 goals) ✖ Incorrect
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
  • 1X2 Liverpool W Liverpool W ✔ Correct
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-0, 2-1, 0-1, 2-0 4-2 ✖ Incorrect

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Sep 17, 2026 · 01:39 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-9166885

Closing Odds 1.22
AI Fair Odds —
CLV +0.0%
Final Result Liverpool W win · Liverpool W 4–2 Sunderland W
Prediction ✔ Correct
Decision Grade B-

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Market intelligence

Supporting read on how the prioritized closing feed moved versus the model — use after the Primary pick above.

Market briefing

The largest late implied swing on this feed was about 0.61 percentage points on Liverpool W (1X2) between PRE30 and PRE1.

The model still exceeds closing implied on Sunderland W (1X2) by about 20.0 percentage points — the clearest mispricing signal summarized on this page.

Model vs. closing implied

Market Model % Closing impl. % Gap (pp)
Liverpool W (1X2) 41.0 75.1 -34.1
Draw (1X2) 29.4 15.3 +14.1
Sunderland W (1X2) 29.6 9.6 +20.0
Over 2.5 goals 48.2 66.3 -18.1
Under 2.5 goals 51.8 33.7 +18.1
What this means

In plain terms: the model lands near 29.6% on Sunderland W (1X2), while the closing snapshot implied about 9.6%. The difference — about 20.0 percentage points — is the largest model-vs.-market gap highlighted on this page.

Quick definitions: “closing implied” is the probability for that outcome implied by the final captured odds (after a simple de-vig). “Gap (pp)” is the model percentage minus that implied value, in percentage points (pp).

Closing-window line move

Single prioritized bookmaker per snapshot (not all books). Capture path: PRE30 → PRE1 · Book: Pinnacle

Column tags in parentheses: Closing uses the first available snapshot in PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Early uses the first available in PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 that is not the same capture as Closing.

Market Early (PRE30) Closing (PRE1) Implied Δ (pp)
Liverpool W (1X2) 1.21 1.22 +0.6
Draw (1X2) 5.78 5.98 -0.3
Sunderland W (1X2) 9.05 9.52 -0.3
Over 2.5 goals 1.39 1.39 0.0
Under 2.5 goals 2.73 2.73 0.0

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Model favours Liverpool W; market prices Liverpool W instead — inputs may be missing or stale.

  • Model: Liverpool W 1.42 xG vs Sunderland W 1.18 → Liverpool W 40.9%
  • Market: Liverpool W ~75.1% implied
  • Validation failed — do not treat 1X2 EV as actionable.

Do not act on 1X2 value until validation passes. Structural leans (O/U, BTTS) need separate odds review.

Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 51.8% · Over 2.5 48.2%); BTTS Yes (Yes 54.1% · No 45.9%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS Yes

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: Wait - No Primary Bet

Outcome: Validated — Pre-match lean validated against the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 30, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for Liverpool W & Sunderland W!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Statistics