Enppi vs Pyramids FC Statistics & Analysis

Enppi

Sep 17, 2026 - 17:00

1 0.75

2 1.53

xG Accuracy: 82%

Pyramids FC

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

Market Prediction Result Outcome
Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (3 goals) ✖ Incorrect
Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
1X2 Pyramids FC Pyramids FC ✔ Correct
Correct Score Insights 0-1, 0-2, 1-1, 0-0, 1-2 1-2 ✔ Correct

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Sep 10, 2026 · 15:44 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-7926062

Closing Odds 1.4

AI Fair Odds 1.53

CLV +0.0%

Final Result Pyramids FC win · Enppi 1–2 Pyramids FC

Prediction ✔ Correct

Decision Grade B-

Probability Calibration

Expected: 65.5%
Historical Bucket: 65–70% — Building sample

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Market intelligence

Supporting read on how the prioritized closing feed moved versus the model — use after the Primary pick above.

Market briefing

Market remained largely stable before kickoff. No meaningful late implied-price shift was detected between PRE30 and PRE1 on the prioritized bookmaker snapshot.

Despite limited late movement, the model still prices Enppi (1X2), Draw (1X2), Under 2.5 goals meaningfully above what those closing snapshots implied — that gap is a static “model vs. price” read, not a late steam or chase story.

The model still exceeds closing implied on Draw (1X2) by about 6.8 percentage points — the clearest mispricing signal summarized on this page.

Model vs. closing implied

Market	Model %	Closing impl. %	Gap (pp)
Enppi (1X2)	16.8	10.1	+6.7
Draw (1X2)	28.8	22.0	+6.8
Pyramids FC (1X2)	54.4	67.9	-13.5
Over 2.5 goals	39.9	43.7	-3.8
Under 2.5 goals	60.1	56.3	+3.8

What this means

In plain terms: the model lands near 28.8% on Draw (1X2), while the closing snapshot implied about 22.0%. The difference — about 6.8 percentage points — is the largest model-vs.-market gap highlighted on this page.

Quick definitions: “closing implied” is the probability for that outcome implied by the final captured odds (after a simple de-vig). “Gap (pp)” is the model percentage minus that implied value, in percentage points (pp).

Closing-window line move

Single prioritized bookmaker per snapshot (not all books). Capture path: PRE30 → PRE1 · Book: Pinnacle

Column tags in parentheses: Closing uses the first available snapshot in PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Early uses the first available in PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 that is not the same capture as Closing.

Detailed capture odds are folded below — movement was negligible on de-vig implied prices.

View full line-by-line capture table

Market	Early (PRE30)	Closing (PRE1)
Enppi (1X2)	9.4	9.4
Draw (1X2)	4.32	4.32
Pyramids FC (1X2)	1.4	1.4
Over 2.5 goals	2.19	2.19
Under 2.5 goals	1.7	1.7

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Quick read on how the model reads this matchup.

League: Premier League
Fixture: Enppi vs Pyramids FC
Kickoff: 2026-09-17 17:00:00
1X2 (model): Home 16.8% · Draw 28.8% · Away 54.4%
xG (showing): Enppi 0.75 — Pyramids FC 1.53 (total xG ≈ 2.28)
Best +EV line (same label as hero card when Primary thresholds are not met): BTTS Yes
Model: 42.9% · Implied: 37.4% · Probability edge: +5.5 pts · Est. EV: +12.8%
BTTS (model): Yes 42.9% · No 57.1%
Correct score (top bin): 0-1 (15.6%)

Totals and BTTS are evaluated against current market prices where available.

1X2 can look balanced even when side markets show clearer structure.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: Selective Lean - No Primary Bet

Outcome: Validated — Pre-match lean validated against the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 29, 2026 (UTC)

Explore More Predictions Content

Get Premium Predictions for Enppi & Pyramids FC!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now

Back to Statistics

Premier League — Standings

#	TEAM	MP	W	D	L	PTS
1	Pyramids FC	5	5	0	0	15
2	Zamalek SC	5	4	1	0	13
3	Al Ahly	5	4	1	0	13
4	Ceramica Cleopatra	5	4	0	1	12
5	Future FC	5	3	1	1	10
6	Al Ittihad	5	3	1	1	10
7	El Mokawloon	5	2	1	2	7
8	Petrojet	5	2	1	2	7
9	El Geish	5	2	1	2	7
10	Masr	5	2	1	2	7
11	Olympic El Qanah	5	1	3	1	6
12	AL Masry	5	2	0	3	6
13	National Bank of Egypt	5	2	0	3	6
14	Wadi Degla	5	1	2	2	5
15	Enppi	5	1	1	3	4
16	Smouha SC	5	1	1	3	4
17	Abu Qair Semad	5	1	0	4	3
18	El Gouna FC	5	0	2	3	2
19	Asyut Petrol	5	0	2	3	2
20	Ghazl El Mehalla	5	0	1	4	1

#	TEAM	MP	GS	GC	+/-	PTS
1	Ceramica Cleopatra	5	10	3	+7	12
2	Pyramids FC	5	9	1	+8	15
3	Al Ahly	5	9	3	+6	13
4	Zamalek SC	5	8	1	+7	13
5	Petrojet	5	8	8	0	7
6	Future FC	5	7	4	+3	10
7	Al Ittihad	5	6	3	+3	10
8	El Mokawloon	5	6	5	+1	7
9	Enppi	5	6	9	-3	4
10	El Geish	5	5	5	0	7
11	Olympic El Qanah	5	5	5	0	6
12	AL Masry	5	5	7	-2	6
13	Masr	5	4	5	-1	7
14	Wadi Degla	5	4	5	-1	5
15	National Bank of Egypt	5	4	7	-3	6
16	El Gouna FC	5	3	6	-3	2
17	Smouha SC	5	1	4	-3	4
18	Asyut Petrol	5	1	5	-4	2
19	Abu Qair Semad	5	1	8	-7	3
20	Ghazl El Mehalla	5	1	9	-8	1

#	TEAM	MP	xG	xGC	+/-	PTS
1	Pyramids FC	5	4.7	1.0	+3.7	15
2	AL Masry	5	4.8	2.7	+2.1	6
3	Petrojet	5	5.3	3.7	+1.6	7
4	National Bank of Egypt	5	4.0	2.4	+1.6	6
5	Ceramica Cleopatra	5	5.5	4.1	+1.4	12
6	Al Ahly	5	4.2	3.0	+1.2	13
7	Wadi Degla	5	3.6	3.3	+0.3	5
8	Smouha SC	5	2.2	1.9	+0.3	4
9	Asyut Petrol	5	1.9	1.7	+0.2	2
10	Future FC	5	4.6	4.5	+0.1	10
11	Al Ittihad	5	3.7	3.6	+0.1	10
12	El Geish	5	2.9	3.0	-0.1	7
13	Masr	5	3.1	3.6	-0.5	7
14	Enppi	5	4.9	5.7	-0.8	4
15	Abu Qair Semad	5	0.9	1.7	-0.8	3
16	El Mokawloon	5	3.4	4.4	-1.0	7
17	El Gouna FC	5	3.2	4.9	-1.7	2
18	Olympic El Qanah	5	2.4	4.5	-2.1	6
19	Zamalek SC	5	2.6	5.0	-2.4	13
20	Ghazl El Mehalla	5	1.9	5.0	-3.1	1