Concón National vs Trasandino Statistics & Analysis

Concón National

Aug 16, 2026 - 19:30

1 1.44

3 1.16

xG Accuracy: 53%

Trasandino

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

Market Prediction Result Outcome
Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (4 goals) ✖ Incorrect
Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
1X2 Concón National Trasandino ✖ Incorrect
Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-0, 2-1, 0-1, 2-0 1-3 ✖ Incorrect

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Aug 11, 2026 · 01:58 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-3615216

Closing Odds 3.51

AI Fair Odds —

CLV +0.0%

Final Result Trasandino win · Concón National 1–3 Trasandino

Prediction ✖ Missed

Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Market intelligence

Supporting read on how the prioritized closing feed moved versus the model — use after the Primary pick above.

Market briefing

Market remained largely stable before kickoff. No meaningful late implied-price shift was detected between PRE30 and PRE1 on the prioritized bookmaker snapshot.

Despite limited late movement, the model still prices Draw (1X2) meaningfully above what those closing snapshots implied — that gap is a static “model vs. price” read, not a late steam or chase story.

The model still exceeds closing implied on Draw (1X2) by about 3.4 percentage points — the clearest mispricing signal summarized on this page.

Model vs. closing implied

Market	Model %	Closing impl. %	Gap (pp)
Concón National (1X2)	41.9	44.2	-2.4
Draw (1X2)	29.3	25.9	+3.4
Trasandino (1X2)	28.8	29.9	-1.0
Over 2.5 goals	48.2	47.4	+0.8
Under 2.5 goals	51.8	52.6	-0.8

What this means

In plain terms: the model lands near 29.3% on Draw (1X2), while the closing snapshot implied about 25.9%. The difference — about 3.4 percentage points — is the largest model-vs.-market gap highlighted on this page.

Quick definitions: “closing implied” is the probability for that outcome implied by the final captured odds (after a simple de-vig). “Gap (pp)” is the model percentage minus that implied value, in percentage points (pp).

Closing-window line move

Single prioritized bookmaker per snapshot (not all books). Capture path: PRE30 → PRE1 · Book: Pinnacle

Column tags in parentheses: Closing uses the first available snapshot in PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Early uses the first available in PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 that is not the same capture as Closing.

Detailed capture odds are folded below — movement was negligible on de-vig implied prices.

View full line-by-line capture table

Market	Early (PRE30)	Closing (PRE1)
Concón National (1X2)	2.06	2.06
Draw (1X2)	3.51	3.51
Trasandino (1X2)	3.05	3.05
Over 2.5 goals	1.99	1.99
Under 2.5 goals	1.79	1.79

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Below is a compact, numbers-first snapshot aligned with the same engine as the cards above.

League: Segunda División
Fixture: Concón National vs Trasandino
Kickoff: 2026-08-16 19:30:00
1X2 (model): Home 41.9% · Draw 29.3% · Away 28.8%
xG (showing): Concón National 1.44 — Trasandino 1.16 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
Value headline: None — no positive EV on tracked lines at current best prices (same as the decision block: no default bet).
Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 51.8% · Over 2.5 48.2%); BTTS Yes (Yes 54.0% · No 46.0%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Over 2.5; BTTS Yes
BTTS (model): Yes 54.0% · No 46.0%
Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (12.4%)

Saying “no value” on a snapshot is a feature, not a bug: it protects readers from forcing a play when the edge is not there.

Most likely correct score stays a low-probability tail: use it for context, not as a must-bet story.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: No Primary Bet

Outcome: Missed — Pre-match 1X2 lean did not match the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 29, 2026 (UTC)

Explore More Predictions Content

Get Premium Predictions for Concón National & Trasandino!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now

Back to Statistics

Segunda División — Standings

#	TEAM	MP	W	D	L	PTS
1	Provincial Osorno	12	6	6	0	24
2	Municipal Salamanca	12	5	7	0	22
3	Colchagua	12	6	4	2	22
4	Concón National	12	6	3	3	21
5	Santiago City	12	5	5	2	20
6	Linares Unido	12	6	1	5	19
7	Trasandino	12	5	3	4	18
8	General Velásquez	12	5	1	6	16
9	Real San Joaquín	12	3	4	5	13
10	Lota Schwager	12	3	4	5	13
11	Colina	12	3	3	6	12
12	Deportes Rengo	12	3	2	7	11
13	Santiago Morning	12	2	4	6	10
14	Provincial Ovalle	12	1	3	8	6

#	TEAM	MP	GS	GC	+/-	PTS
1	Trasandino	12	19	17	+2	18
2	Santiago City	12	18	19	-1	20
3	Concón National	12	16	10	+6	21
4	Linares Unido	12	16	12	+4	19
5	Real San Joaquín	12	16	17	-1	13
6	Provincial Osorno	12	15	5	+10	24
7	Colchagua	12	15	11	+4	22
8	Colina	12	15	14	+1	12
9	Municipal Salamanca	12	11	5	+6	22
10	Lota Schwager	12	11	13	-2	13
11	General Velásquez	12	11	15	-4	16
12	Provincial Ovalle	12	11	24	-13	6
13	Deportes Rengo	12	10	17	-7	11
14	Santiago Morning	12	9	14	-5	10