Statistics / Football / England. Women's Championship / Leicester City WFC vs Durham W

Leicester City WFC vs Durham W Statistics & Analysis

Sep 13, 2026 - 14:00
4 1.34
2 1.26
xG Accuracy: 39%
Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (6 goals) ✖ Incorrect
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
  • 1X2 Leicester City WFC Leicester City WFC ✔ Correct
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 4-2 ✖ Incorrect

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Sep 07, 2026 · 01:48 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-7444708

Closing Odds 1.27
AI Fair Odds
CLV +0.0%
Final Result Leicester City WFC win · Leicester City WFC 4–2 Durham W
Prediction ✔ Correct
Decision Grade B-

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Market intelligence

Supporting read on how the prioritized closing feed moved versus the model — use after the Primary pick above.

Market briefing

Market remained largely stable before kickoff. No meaningful late implied-price shift was detected between PRE30 and PRE5 on the prioritized bookmaker snapshot.

Despite limited late movement, the model still prices Draw (1X2), Durham W (1X2), Under 2.5 goals meaningfully above what those closing snapshots implied — that gap is a static “model vs. price” read, not a late steam or chase story.

The model still exceeds closing implied on Durham W (1X2) by about 22.1 percentage points — the clearest mispricing signal summarized on this page.

Model vs. closing implied

Market Model % Closing impl. % Gap (pp)
Leicester City WFC (1X2) 37.0 71.4 -34.4
Draw (1X2) 29.6 17.4 +12.2
Durham W (1X2) 33.4 11.2 +22.1
Over 2.5 goals 48.2 57.7 -9.5
Under 2.5 goals 51.8 42.3 +9.5
What this means

In plain terms: the model lands near 33.4% on Durham W (1X2), while the closing snapshot implied about 11.2%. The difference — about 22.1 percentage points — is the largest model-vs.-market gap highlighted on this page.

Quick definitions: “closing implied” is the probability for that outcome implied by the final captured odds (after a simple de-vig). “Gap (pp)” is the model percentage minus that implied value, in percentage points (pp).

Closing-window line move

Single prioritized bookmaker per snapshot (not all books). Capture path: PRE30 → PRE5 · Book: Pinnacle

Column tags in parentheses: Closing uses the first available snapshot in PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Early uses the first available in PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 that is not the same capture as Closing.

Detailed capture odds are folded below — movement was negligible on de-vig implied prices.

View full line-by-line capture table
Market Early (PRE30) Closing (PRE5) Implied Δ (pp)
Leicester City WFC (1X2) 1.27 1.27 0.0
Draw (1X2) 5.22 5.22 0.0
Durham W (1X2) 8.08 8.08 0.0
Over 2.5 goals 1.61 1.61 0.0
Under 2.5 goals 2.2 2.2 0.0

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Model favours Leicester City WFC; market prices Leicester City WFC instead — inputs may be missing or stale.

  • Model: Leicester City WFC 1.34 xG vs Durham W 1.26 → Leicester City WFC 37.1%
  • Market: Leicester City WFC ~71.4% implied
  • Validation failed — do not treat 1X2 EV as actionable.

Do not act on 1X2 value until validation passes. Structural leans (O/U, BTTS) need separate odds review.

Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 51.8% · Over 2.5 48.2%); BTTS Yes (Yes 54.5% · No 45.5%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS Yes

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: Wait - No Primary Bet

Outcome: Validated — Pre-match lean validated against the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 16, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for Leicester City WFC & Durham W!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Statistics
Women's Championship Women's ChampionshipStandings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Newcastle United W 2 2 0 0 6
2 Sunderland W 1 1 0 0 3
3 Southampton W 1 1 0 0 3
4 Leicester City WFC 1 1 0 0 3
5 Nottingham Forest W 1 0 1 0 1
6 Ipswich Town W 1 0 1 0 1
7 Watford W 1 0 1 0 1
8 Burnley W 1 0 1 0 1
9 Sheffield United W 1 0 0 1 0
10 Durham W 1 0 0 1 0
11 Wolverhampton W 1 0 0 1 0
12 Bristol City W 2 0 0 2 0
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Sunderland W 1 4 1 +3 3
2 Newcastle United W 2 3 0 +3 6
3 Southampton W 1 3 1 +2 3
4 Leicester City WFC 1 1 0 +1 3
5 Nottingham Forest W 1 1 1 0 1
6 Ipswich Town W 1 1 1 0 1
7 Durham W 1 1 3 -2 0
8 Bristol City W 2 1 5 -4 0
9 Watford W 1 0 0 0 1
10 Burnley W 1 0 0 0 1
11 Sheffield United W 1 0 1 -1 0
12 Wolverhampton W 1 0 2 -2 0