Nottingham Forest W vs Watford W Statistics & Analysis

Nottingham Forest W

Sep 13, 2026 - 13:00

2 1.30

xG Accuracy: 68%

Watford W

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

Market Prediction Result Outcome
Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (4 goals) ✖ Incorrect
Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
1X2 Nottingham Forest W Draw ✖ Incorrect
Correct Score Insights 1-1, 0-1, 1-0, 1-2, 2-1 2-2 ✖ Incorrect

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Sep 07, 2026 · 01:29 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-7435638

Closing Odds 1.62

AI Fair Odds —

CLV +0.0%

Final Result Draw · Nottingham Forest W 2–2 Watford W

Prediction ✖ Missed

Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Market intelligence

Supporting read on how the prioritized closing feed moved versus the model — use after the Primary pick above.

Market briefing

Market remained largely stable before kickoff. No meaningful late implied-price shift was detected between PRE30 and PRE1 on the prioritized bookmaker snapshot.

Despite limited late movement, the model still prices Draw (1X2), Watford W (1X2), Under 2.5 goals meaningfully above what those closing snapshots implied — that gap is a static “model vs. price” read, not a late steam or chase story.

The model still exceeds closing implied on Watford W (1X2) by about 13.5 percentage points — the clearest mispricing signal summarized on this page.

Model vs. closing implied

Market	Model %	Closing impl. %	Gap (pp)
Nottingham Forest W (1X2)	35.2	55.7	-20.5
Draw (1X2)	29.6	22.6	+7.0
Watford W (1X2)	35.2	21.7	+13.5
Over 2.5 goals	48.2	55.2	-7.0
Under 2.5 goals	51.8	44.8	+7.0

What this means

In plain terms: the model lands near 35.2% on Watford W (1X2), while the closing snapshot implied about 21.7%. The difference — about 13.5 percentage points — is the largest model-vs.-market gap highlighted on this page.

Quick definitions: “closing implied” is the probability for that outcome implied by the final captured odds (after a simple de-vig). “Gap (pp)” is the model percentage minus that implied value, in percentage points (pp).

Closing-window line move

Single prioritized bookmaker per snapshot (not all books). Capture path: PRE30 → PRE1 · Book: Pinnacle

Column tags in parentheses: Closing uses the first available snapshot in PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Early uses the first available in PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 that is not the same capture as Closing.

Detailed capture odds are folded below — movement was negligible on de-vig implied prices.

View full line-by-line capture table

Market	Early (PRE30)	Closing (PRE1)
Nottingham Forest W (1X2)	1.62	1.62
Draw (1X2)	3.99	3.99
Watford W (1X2)	4.16	4.16
Over 2.5 goals	1.69	1.69
Under 2.5 goals	2.08	2.08

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Pre-match snapshot for this fixture.

League: Women's Championship
Fixture: Nottingham Forest W vs Watford W
Kickoff: 2026-09-13 13:00:00
1X2 (model): Home 35.2% · Draw 29.6% · Away 35.2%
xG (showing): Nottingham Forest W 1.3 — Watford W 1.3 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
Value headline: At least one tracked line reaches the headline EV threshold — align with the hero / Primary card if shown.
Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 51.8% · Over 2.5 48.2%); BTTS Yes (Yes 54.5% · No 45.5%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS Yes
BTTS (model): Yes 54.5% · No 45.5%
Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (12.6%)

The decision block shows no default Primary: Primary needs consensus EV ≥ +5.0% plus strength/reliability/calibration gates. A separate Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only). Lean labels are directional only — not bankroll-sized recommendations.

Prefer skipping to over-staking when the engine is honest about missing edge.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: Wait - No Primary Bet

Outcome: Missed — Pre-match 1X2 lean did not match the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 29, 2026 (UTC)

Explore More Predictions Content

Get Premium Predictions for Nottingham Forest W & Watford W!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now

Back to Statistics

Women's Championship — Standings

#	TEAM	MP	W	D	L	PTS
1	Newcastle United W	3	3	0	0	9
2	Sunderland W	3	2	1	0	7
3	Wolverhampton W	3	2	0	1	6
4	Leicester City WFC	3	2	0	1	6
5	Southampton W	3	1	2	0	5
6	Nottingham Forest W	3	1	2	0	5
7	Ipswich Town W	3	1	2	0	5
8	Bristol City W	4	1	1	2	4
9	Watford W	3	0	2	1	2
10	Burnley W	4	0	2	2	2
11	Durham W	3	0	0	3	0
12	Sheffield United W	3	0	0	3	0

#	TEAM	MP	GS	GC	+/-	PTS
1	Newcastle United W	3	7	1	+6	9
2	Sunderland W	3	6	2	+4	7
3	Wolverhampton W	3	6	3	+3	6
4	Bristol City W	4	6	6	0	4
5	Leicester City WFC	3	5	3	+2	6
6	Nottingham Forest W	3	5	4	+1	5
7	Durham W	3	4	9	-5	0
8	Southampton W	3	3	1	+2	5
9	Watford W	3	3	7	-4	2
10	Ipswich Town W	3	2	1	+1	5
11	Sheffield United W	3	2	8	-6	0
12	Burnley W	4	1	5	-4	2