Statistics / Football / England. Women's Championship / Sheffield United W vs Leicester City WFC

Sheffield United W vs Leicester City WFC Statistics & Analysis

Sheffield United W Sheffield United W
Sep 06, 2026 - 13:00
0 1.21
1 1.39
xG Accuracy: 64%
Leicester City WFC Leicester City WFC
Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Under 2.5 (1 goals) ✔ Correct
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS No No ✔ Correct
  • 1X2 Leicester City WFC Leicester City WFC ✔ Correct
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 0-1, 1-0, 1-2, 2-1 0-1 ✔ Correct

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Aug 31, 2026 · 07:03 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-6356164

Closing Odds 1.8
AI Fair Odds —
CLV +0.0%
Final Result Leicester City WFC win · Sheffield United W 0–1 Leicester City WFC
Prediction ✔ Correct
Decision Grade A

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Market intelligence

Supporting read on how the prioritized closing feed moved versus the model — use after the Primary pick above.

Market briefing

Market remained largely stable before kickoff. No meaningful late implied-price shift was detected between PRE30 and PRE5 on the prioritized bookmaker snapshot.

Despite limited late movement, the model still prices Sheffield United W (1X2), Draw (1X2), Under 2.5 goals meaningfully above what those closing snapshots implied — that gap is a static “model vs. price” read, not a late steam or chase story.

The model still exceeds closing implied on Under 2.5 goals by about 8.9 percentage points — the clearest mispricing signal summarized on this page.

Model vs. closing implied

Market Model % Closing impl. % Gap (pp)
Sheffield United W (1X2) 31.0 27.3 +3.7
Draw (1X2) 29.5 22.6 +6.9
Leicester City WFC (1X2) 39.5 50.1 -10.6
Over 2.5 goals 48.2 57.1 -8.9
Under 2.5 goals 51.8 42.9 +8.9
What this means

In plain terms: the model lands near 51.8% on Under 2.5 goals, while the closing snapshot implied about 42.9%. The difference — about 8.9 percentage points — is the largest model-vs.-market gap highlighted on this page.

Quick definitions: “closing implied” is the probability for that outcome implied by the final captured odds (after a simple de-vig). “Gap (pp)” is the model percentage minus that implied value, in percentage points (pp).

Closing-window line move

Single prioritized bookmaker per snapshot (not all books). Capture path: PRE30 → PRE5 · Book: Bet365

Column tags in parentheses: Closing uses the first available snapshot in PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Early uses the first available in PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 that is not the same capture as Closing.

Detailed capture odds are folded below — movement was negligible on de-vig implied prices.

View full line-by-line capture table
Market Early (PRE30) Closing (PRE5) Implied Δ (pp)
Sheffield United W (1X2) 3.3 3.3 0.0
Draw (1X2) 4.0 4.0 0.0
Leicester City WFC (1X2) 1.8 1.8 0.0
Over 2.5 goals 1.65 1.65 0.0
Under 2.5 goals 2.2 2.2 0.0

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Below is a compact, numbers-first snapshot aligned with the same engine as the cards above.

  • League: Women's Championship
  • Fixture: Sheffield United W vs Leicester City WFC
  • Kickoff: 2026-09-06 13:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 31.0% · Draw 29.5% · Away 39.5%
  • xG (showing): Sheffield United W 1.21 — Leicester City WFC 1.39 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
  • Best +EV line (same label as hero card when Primary thresholds are not met): Under 2.5 goals
  • Model: 51.8% · Implied: 43.0% · Probability edge: +8.8 pts · Est. EV: +14.0%
  • BTTS (model): Yes 54.3% · No 45.7%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (12.5%)

Use the cards for tiering; this text only restates the same inputs in narrative form.

1X2 can look balanced even when side markets show clearer structure.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: Selective Lean - No Primary Bet

Outcome: Validated — Pre-match lean validated against the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

October 01, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for Sheffield United W & Leicester City WFC!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Statistics
Women's Championship Women's Championship — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Newcastle United W 3 3 0 0 9
2 Sunderland W 3 2 1 0 7
3 Wolverhampton W 3 2 0 1 6
4 Leicester City WFC 3 2 0 1 6
5 Southampton W 3 1 2 0 5
6 Nottingham Forest W 3 1 2 0 5
7 Ipswich Town W 3 1 2 0 5
8 Bristol City W 4 1 1 2 4
9 Watford W 3 0 2 1 2
10 Burnley W 4 0 2 2 2
11 Durham W 3 0 0 3 0
12 Sheffield United W 3 0 0 3 0
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Newcastle United W 3 7 1 +6 9
2 Sunderland W 3 6 2 +4 7
3 Wolverhampton W 3 6 3 +3 6
4 Bristol City W 4 6 6 0 4
5 Leicester City WFC 3 5 3 +2 6
6 Nottingham Forest W 3 5 4 +1 5
7 Durham W 3 4 9 -5 0
8 Southampton W 3 3 1 +2 5
9 Watford W 3 3 7 -4 2
10 Ipswich Town W 3 2 1 +1 5
11 Sheffield United W 3 2 8 -6 0
12 Burnley W 4 1 5 -4 2
Women's Championship England. Women's Championship Predictions