Bari vs Cavese Statistics & Analysis

Bari

Aug 21, 2026 - 19:00

3 1.31

0 1.29

xG Accuracy: 44%

Cavese

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

Market Prediction Result Outcome
Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (3 goals) ✖ Incorrect
Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes No ✖ Incorrect
1X2 Bari Bari ✔ Correct
Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 3-0 ✖ Incorrect

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Aug 15, 2026 · 02:24 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-4039572

Closing Odds 1.51

AI Fair Odds —

CLV +0.0%

Final Result Bari win · Bari 3–0 Cavese

Prediction ✔ Correct

Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Market intelligence

Supporting read on how the prioritized closing feed moved versus the model — use after the Primary pick above.

Market briefing

Market remained largely stable before kickoff. No meaningful late implied-price shift was detected between PRE30 and PRE1 on the prioritized bookmaker snapshot.

Despite limited late movement, the model still prices Draw (1X2), Cavese (1X2), Over 2.5 goals meaningfully above what those closing snapshots implied — that gap is a static “model vs. price” read, not a late steam or chase story.

The model still exceeds closing implied on Cavese (1X2) by about 20.1 percentage points — the clearest mispricing signal summarized on this page.

Model vs. closing implied

Market	Model %	Closing impl. %	Gap (pp)
Bari (1X2)	35.6	62.4	-26.8
Draw (1X2)	29.7	23.1	+6.6
Cavese (1X2)	34.7	14.6	+20.1
Over 2.5 goals	48.2	40.3	+7.9
Under 2.5 goals	51.8	59.7	-7.9

What this means

In plain terms: the model lands near 34.7% on Cavese (1X2), while the closing snapshot implied about 14.6%. The difference — about 20.1 percentage points — is the largest model-vs.-market gap highlighted on this page.

Quick definitions: “closing implied” is the probability for that outcome implied by the final captured odds (after a simple de-vig). “Gap (pp)” is the model percentage minus that implied value, in percentage points (pp).

Closing-window line move

Single prioritized bookmaker per snapshot (not all books). Capture path: PRE30 → PRE1 · Book: Pinnacle

Column tags in parentheses: Closing uses the first available snapshot in PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Early uses the first available in PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 that is not the same capture as Closing.

Detailed capture odds are folded below — movement was negligible on de-vig implied prices.

View full line-by-line capture table

Market	Early (PRE30)	Closing (PRE1)
Bari (1X2)	1.51	1.51
Draw (1X2)	4.08	4.08
Cavese (1X2)	6.46	6.46
Over 2.5 goals	2.34	2.34
Under 2.5 goals	1.58	1.58

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Below is a compact, numbers-first snapshot aligned with the same engine as the cards above.

League: Serie C - Girone C
Fixture: Bari vs Cavese
Kickoff: 2026-08-21 19:00:00
1X2 (model): Home 35.6% · Draw 29.7% · Away 34.7%
xG (showing): Bari 1.31 — Cavese 1.29 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
Value headline: At least one tracked line reaches the headline EV threshold — align with the hero / Primary card if shown.
Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 51.8% · Over 2.5 48.2%); BTTS Yes (Yes 54.5% · No 45.5%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Over 2.5; BTTS Yes
BTTS (model): Yes 54.5% · No 45.5%
Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (12.6%)

Saying “no value” on a snapshot is a feature, not a bug: it protects readers from forcing a play when the edge is not there.

Prefer skipping to over-staking when the engine is honest about missing edge.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: Wait - No Primary Bet

Outcome: Validated — Pre-match lean validated against the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 27, 2026 (UTC)

Explore More Predictions Content

Get Premium Predictions for Bari & Cavese!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now

Back to Statistics

Serie C - Girone C — Standings

#	TEAM	MP	W	D	L	PTS
1	Bari	7	5	1	1	16
2	Sorrento	6	5	0	1	15
3	Potenza	6	4	1	1	13
4	AZ Picerno	7	4	0	3	12
5	Casertana	6	3	3	0	12
6	Audace Cerignola	7	3	1	3	10
7	Inter U23	6	3	1	2	10
8	Casarano	6	3	1	2	10
9	Salernitana	7	2	3	2	9
10	SS Monopoli	6	2	2	2	8
11	Cavese	7	2	2	3	8
12	Catania	6	2	1	3	7
13	Barletta	6	1	4	1	7
14	Scafatese	6	1	4	1	7
15	Team Altamura	6	2	1	3	7
16	Savoia	7	1	3	3	6
17	Foggia	6	1	2	3	5
18	Giugliano	6	1	1	4	4
19	Cosenza	7	0	2	5	2
20	Crotone	7	1	3	3	0

#	TEAM	MP	GS	GC	+/-	PTS
1	AZ Picerno	7	14	11	+3	12
2	Potenza	6	13	8	+5	13
3	Cavese	7	12	14	-2	8
4	Audace Cerignola	7	11	7	+4	10
5	Casertana	6	11	8	+3	12
6	Inter U23	6	11	11	0	10
7	Giugliano	6	11	16	-5	4
8	Bari	7	10	4	+6	16
9	Sorrento	6	10	5	+5	15
10	Catania	6	10	8	+2	7
11	Salernitana	7	10	9	+1	9
12	Barletta	6	10	9	+1	7
13	Casarano	6	10	10	0	10
14	Savoia	7	9	11	-2	6
15	Scafatese	6	8	9	-1	7
16	Crotone	7	7	10	-3	0
17	SS Monopoli	6	5	4	+1	8
18	Cosenza	7	5	16	-11	2
19	Foggia	6	4	7	-3	5
20	Team Altamura	6	4	8	-4	7