Statistics / Football / England. FA WSL / Brighton W vs Charlton Athletic W

Brighton W vs Charlton Athletic W Statistics & Analysis

Brighton W Brighton W
Oct 04, 2026 - 13:00
5 0.76
1 0.70
xG Accuracy: 29%
Charlton Athletic W Charlton Athletic W
Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (6 goals) ✖ Incorrect
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS No Yes ✖ Incorrect
  • 1X2 Brighton W Brighton W ✔ Correct
  • Correct Score Insights 0-0, 1-0, 0-1, 1-1, 2-0 5-1 ✖ Incorrect

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Sep 29, 2026 · 01:29 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-11668222

Closing Odds 1.21
AI Fair Odds —
CLV +0.0%
Final Result Brighton W win · Brighton W 5–1 Charlton Athletic W
Prediction ✔ Correct
Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Market intelligence

Supporting read on how the prioritized closing feed moved versus the model — use after the Primary pick above.

Market briefing

Market remained largely stable before kickoff. No meaningful late implied-price shift was detected between PRE30 and PRE10 on the prioritized bookmaker snapshot.

Despite limited late movement, the model still prices Draw (1X2), Charlton Athletic W (1X2), Under 2.5 goals meaningfully above what those closing snapshots implied — that gap is a static “model vs. price” read, not a late steam or chase story.

The model still exceeds closing implied on Under 2.5 goals by about 47.5 percentage points — the clearest mispricing signal summarized on this page.

Model vs. closing implied

Market Model % Closing impl. % Gap (pp)
Brighton W (1X2) 45.5 76.7 -31.2
Draw (1X2) 32.7 14.6 +18.1
Charlton Athletic W (1X2) 21.9 8.8 +13.1
Over 2.5 goals 18.1 65.6 -47.5
Under 2.5 goals 81.9 34.4 +47.5
What this means

In plain terms: the model lands near 81.9% on Under 2.5 goals, while the closing snapshot implied about 34.4%. The difference — about 47.5 percentage points — is the largest model-vs.-market gap highlighted on this page.

Quick definitions: “closing implied” is the probability for that outcome implied by the final captured odds (after a simple de-vig). “Gap (pp)” is the model percentage minus that implied value, in percentage points (pp).

Closing-window line move

Single prioritized bookmaker per snapshot (not all books). Capture path: PRE30 → PRE10 · Book: Pinnacle

Column tags in parentheses: Closing uses the first available snapshot in PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Early uses the first available in PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 that is not the same capture as Closing.

Detailed capture odds are folded below — movement was negligible on de-vig implied prices.

View full line-by-line capture table
Market Early (PRE30) Closing (PRE10) Implied Δ (pp)
Brighton W (1X2) 1.21 1.21 0.0
Draw (1X2) 6.35 6.35 0.0
Charlton Athletic W (1X2) 10.6 10.6 0.0
Over 2.5 goals 1.42 1.42 0.0
Under 2.5 goals 2.71 2.71 0.0

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Model favours Brighton W; market prices Brighton W instead — inputs may be missing or stale.

  • Model: Brighton W 0.76 xG vs Charlton Athletic W 0.70 → Brighton W 45.4%
  • Market: Brighton W ~76.7% implied
  • Validation failed — do not treat 1X2 EV as actionable.

Do not act on 1X2 value until validation passes. Structural leans (O/U, BTTS) need separate odds review.

Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 81.9% · Over 2.5 18.1%); BTTS No (Yes 28.4% · No 71.6%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS No

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: Wait - No Primary Bet

Outcome: Validated — Pre-match lean validated against the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

October 04, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for Brighton W & Charlton Athletic W!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Statistics
FA WSL FA WSL — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Manchester City W 4 4 0 0 12
2 Tottenham Hotspur W 4 3 1 0 10
3 Chelsea W 4 3 1 0 10
4 London City Lionesses 4 3 0 1 9
5 Liverpool W 5 2 1 2 7
6 Manchester United W 5 2 1 2 7
7 Everton W 4 2 0 2 6
8 Arsenal W 4 1 2 1 5
9 Crystal Palace W 4 1 2 1 5
10 West Ham W 4 1 0 3 3
11 Brighton W 4 0 2 2 2
12 Birmingham City W 4 0 2 2 2
13 Aston Villa W 4 0 2 2 2
14 Charlton Athletic W 4 0 0 4 0
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Tottenham Hotspur W 4 15 2 +13 10
2 Manchester City W 4 12 4 +8 12
3 Chelsea W 4 9 1 +8 10
4 London City Lionesses 4 9 4 +5 9
5 Liverpool W 5 9 6 +3 7
6 Birmingham City W 4 6 10 -4 2
7 Manchester United W 5 5 9 -4 7
8 West Ham W 4 4 7 -3 3
9 Crystal Palace W 4 4 10 -6 5
10 Brighton W 4 3 6 -3 2
11 Aston Villa W 4 3 10 -7 2
12 Arsenal W 4 2 2 0 5
13 Everton W 4 2 3 -1 6
14 Charlton Athletic W 4 1 10 -9 0
# TEAM MP xG xGC +/- PTS
1 London City Lionesses 4 1.2 0.2 +1.0 9
2 Manchester United W 5 0.2 1.2 -1.0 7
3 Manchester City W 4 — — — 12
4 Tottenham Hotspur W 4 — — — 10
5 Chelsea W 4 — — — 10
6 Liverpool W 5 — — — 7
7 Everton W 4 — — — 6
8 Arsenal W 4 — — — 5
9 Crystal Palace W 4 — — — 5
10 West Ham W 4 — — — 3
11 Brighton W 4 — — — 2
12 Birmingham City W 4 — — — 2
13 Aston Villa W 4 — — — 2
14 Charlton Athletic W 4 — — — 0