Statistics / Football / England. Non League Premier - Northern / Avro vs Lancaster City

Avro vs Lancaster City Statistics & Analysis

Avro Avro
Oct 07, 2026 - 18:45
5 1.25
3 1.35
xG Accuracy: 23%
Lancaster City Lancaster City
Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (8 goals) ✖ Incorrect
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
  • 1X2 Lancaster City Avro ✖ Incorrect
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 0-1, 1-0, 1-2, 2-1 5-3 ✖ Incorrect

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Oct 01, 2026 · 02:01 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-12187525

Closing Odds 1.68
AI Fair Odds —
CLV +0.0%
Final Result Avro win · Avro 5–3 Lancaster City
Prediction ✖ Missed
Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Market intelligence

Supporting read on how the prioritized closing feed moved versus the model — use after the Primary pick above.

Market briefing

Market remained largely stable before kickoff. No meaningful late implied-price shift was detected between PRE20 and PRE1 on the prioritized bookmaker snapshot.

Despite limited late movement, the model still prices Draw (1X2), Lancaster City (1X2) meaningfully above what those closing snapshots implied — that gap is a static “model vs. price” read, not a late steam or chase story.

The model still exceeds closing implied on Lancaster City (1X2) by about 14.6 percentage points — the clearest mispricing signal summarized on this page.

Model vs. closing implied

Market Model % Closing impl. % Gap (pp)
Avro (1X2) 32.9 53.2 -20.4
Draw (1X2) 29.6 23.9 +5.7
Lancaster City (1X2) 37.6 22.9 +14.6
What this means

In plain terms: the model lands near 37.6% on Lancaster City (1X2), while the closing snapshot implied about 22.9%. The difference — about 14.6 percentage points — is the largest model-vs.-market gap highlighted on this page.

Quick definitions: “closing implied” is the probability for that outcome implied by the final captured odds (after a simple de-vig). “Gap (pp)” is the model percentage minus that implied value, in percentage points (pp).

Closing-window line move

Single prioritized bookmaker per snapshot (not all books). Capture path: PRE20 → PRE1 · Book: betsson

Column tags in parentheses: Closing uses the first available snapshot in PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Early uses the first available in PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 that is not the same capture as Closing.

Detailed capture odds are folded below — movement was negligible on de-vig implied prices.

View full line-by-line capture table
Market Early (PRE20) Closing (PRE1) Implied Δ (pp)
Avro (1X2) 1.68 1.68 0.0
Draw (1X2) 3.75 3.75 0.0
Lancaster City (1X2) 3.9 3.9 0.0

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Below is a compact, numbers-first snapshot aligned with the same engine as the cards above.

  • League: Non League Premier - Northern
  • Fixture: Avro vs Lancaster City
  • Kickoff: 2026-10-07 18:45:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 32.9% · Draw 29.6% · Away 37.6%
  • xG (showing): Avro 1.25 — Lancaster City 1.35 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
  • Best +EV line (same label as hero card when Primary thresholds are not met): Under 2.5 goals
  • Model: 51.8% · Implied: 40.1% · Probability edge: +11.7 pts · Est. EV: +23.3%
  • BTTS (model): Yes 54.5% · No 45.5%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (12.5%)

Where EV is shown, it is estimated return per unit stake at the best tracked decimal price — not the same thing as a raw probability gap.

Correct score remains high-variance even when a line is most likely on paper.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: Wait - No Primary Bet

Outcome: Missed — Pre-match 1X2 lean did not match the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

October 12, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for Avro & Lancaster City!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Statistics
Non League Premier - Northern Non League Premier - Northern — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Redcar Athletic 11 7 4 0 25
2 Cleethorpes Town 11 7 3 1 24
3 Avro 9 7 1 1 22
4 Workington 11 6 2 3 20
5 Guiseley AFC 10 6 1 3 19
6 Rylands 11 6 1 4 19
7 Warrington Town 9 5 2 2 17
8 Bury 9 5 1 3 16
9 Curzon Ashton 9 5 1 3 16
10 Lancaster City 11 5 1 5 16
11 Alfreton Town 11 5 0 6 15
12 Hyde United 11 4 2 5 14
13 Gainsborough Trinity 9 4 1 4 13
14 Whitby Town 10 4 0 6 12
15 Ashton United 9 3 2 4 11
16 AFC Emley 11 2 4 5 10
17 Leek Town 10 2 3 5 9
18 Quorn 10 2 3 5 9
19 Bamber Bridge 11 2 3 6 9
20 Stockton Town 11 2 2 7 8
21 Ilkeston Town 11 2 1 8 7
22 United of Manchester 9 1 2 6 5
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Avro 9 28 16 +12 22
2 Cleethorpes Town 11 26 7 +19 24
3 Redcar Athletic 11 22 8 +14 25
4 Guiseley AFC 10 22 11 +11 19
5 Workington 11 21 17 +4 20
6 Bury 9 19 8 +11 16
7 Leek Town 10 19 20 -1 9
8 Curzon Ashton 9 18 10 +8 16
9 Warrington Town 9 18 14 +4 17
10 Alfreton Town 11 17 13 +4 15
11 Rylands 11 17 14 +3 19
12 Quorn 10 16 25 -9 9
13 Bamber Bridge 11 16 31 -15 9
14 Whitby Town 10 15 26 -11 12
15 Gainsborough Trinity 9 14 12 +2 13
16 Stockton Town 11 14 22 -8 8
17 Lancaster City 11 13 19 -6 16
18 Hyde United 11 13 20 -7 14
19 United of Manchester 9 12 19 -7 5
20 Ashton United 9 10 9 +1 11
21 AFC Emley 11 10 22 -12 10
22 Ilkeston Town 11 7 24 -17 7
Non League Premier - Northern England. Non League Premier - Northern Predictions