Statistics / Football / England. Non League Premier - Northern / Warrington Town vs Curzon Ashton

Warrington Town vs Curzon Ashton Statistics & Analysis

Aug 25, 2026 - 18:45
0 1.24
4 1.36
xG Accuracy: 34%
Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (4 goals) ✖ Incorrect
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes No ✖ Incorrect
  • 1X2 Curzon Ashton Curzon Ashton ✔ Correct
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 0-1, 1-0, 1-2, 2-1 0-4 ✖ Incorrect

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Aug 19, 2026 · 02:55 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-4554489

Closing Odds 2.04
AI Fair Odds —
CLV +0.0%
Final Result Curzon Ashton win · Warrington Town 0–4 Curzon Ashton
Prediction ✔ Correct
Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Market intelligence

Supporting read on how the prioritized closing feed moved versus the model — use after the Primary pick above.

Market briefing

Market remained largely stable before kickoff. No meaningful late implied-price shift was detected between PRE30 and PRE1 on the prioritized bookmaker snapshot.

Despite limited late movement, the model still prices Draw (1X2), Curzon Ashton (1X2), Under 2.5 goals meaningfully above what those closing snapshots implied — that gap is a static “model vs. price” read, not a late steam or chase story.

The model still exceeds closing implied on Curzon Ashton (1X2) by about 8.6 percentage points — the clearest mispricing signal summarized on this page.

Model vs. closing implied

Market Model % Closing impl. % Gap (pp)
Warrington Town (1X2) 32.4 44.4 -12.0
Draw (1X2) 29.6 26.2 +3.4
Curzon Ashton (1X2) 38.0 29.4 +8.6
Over 2.5 goals 48.2 52.4 -4.2
Under 2.5 goals 51.8 47.6 +4.2
What this means

In plain terms: the model lands near 38.0% on Curzon Ashton (1X2), while the closing snapshot implied about 29.4%. The difference — about 8.6 percentage points — is the largest model-vs.-market gap highlighted on this page.

Quick definitions: “closing implied” is the probability for that outcome implied by the final captured odds (after a simple de-vig). “Gap (pp)” is the model percentage minus that implied value, in percentage points (pp).

Closing-window line move

Single prioritized bookmaker per snapshot (not all books). Capture path: PRE30 → PRE1 · Book: Pinnacle

Column tags in parentheses: Closing uses the first available snapshot in PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Early uses the first available in PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 that is not the same capture as Closing.

Detailed capture odds are folded below — movement was negligible on de-vig implied prices.

View full line-by-line capture table
Market Early (PRE30) Closing (PRE1) Implied Δ (pp)
Warrington Town (1X2) 2.04 2.04 0.0
Draw (1X2) 3.45 3.45 0.0
Curzon Ashton (1X2) 3.08 3.08 0.0
Over 2.5 goals 1.79 1.79 0.0
Under 2.5 goals 1.97 1.97 0.0

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Below is a compact, numbers-first snapshot aligned with the same engine as the cards above.

  • League: Non League Premier - Northern
  • Fixture: Warrington Town vs Curzon Ashton
  • Kickoff: 2026-08-25 18:45:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 32.4% · Draw 29.6% · Away 38.0%
  • xG (showing): Warrington Town 1.24 — Curzon Ashton 1.36 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
  • Best +EV line (same label as hero card when Primary thresholds are not met): Under 2.5 goals
  • Model: 51.8% · Implied: 48.6% · Probability edge: +3.2 pts · Est. EV: +3.6%
  • BTTS (model): Yes 54.4% · No 45.6%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (12.5%)

Use the cards for tiering; this text only restates the same inputs in narrative form.

1X2 can look balanced even when side markets show clearer structure.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: No Primary Bet

Outcome: Validated — Pre-match lean validated against the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 29, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for Warrington Town & Curzon Ashton!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Statistics
Non League Premier - Northern Non League Premier - Northern — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Cleethorpes Town 10 7 2 1 23
2 Avro 9 7 1 1 22
3 Redcar Athletic 10 6 4 0 22
4 Guiseley AFC 9 6 1 2 19
5 Warrington Town 9 5 2 2 17
6 Bury 9 5 1 3 16
7 Curzon Ashton 9 5 1 3 16
8 Workington 9 5 1 3 16
9 Gainsborough Trinity 9 4 1 4 13
10 Rylands 9 4 1 4 13
11 Alfreton Town 9 4 0 5 12
12 Whitby Town 9 4 0 5 12
13 Ashton United 9 3 2 4 11
14 Hyde United 10 3 2 5 11
15 AFC Emley 9 2 4 3 10
16 Lancaster City 9 3 1 5 10
17 Leek Town 10 2 3 5 9
18 Bamber Bridge 10 2 3 5 9
19 Stockton Town 10 2 2 6 8
20 Ilkeston Town 9 2 1 6 7
21 Quorn 9 1 3 5 6
22 United of Manchester 9 1 2 6 5
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Avro 9 28 16 +12 22
2 Cleethorpes Town 10 25 6 +19 23
3 Guiseley AFC 9 22 10 +12 19
4 Redcar Athletic 10 19 7 +12 22
5 Bury 9 19 8 +11 16
6 Leek Town 10 19 20 -1 9
7 Curzon Ashton 9 18 10 +8 16
8 Warrington Town 9 18 14 +4 17
9 Workington 9 17 15 +2 16
10 Alfreton Town 9 15 10 +5 12
11 Gainsborough Trinity 9 14 12 +2 13
12 Whitby Town 9 14 24 -10 12
13 Bamber Bridge 10 14 27 -13 9
14 Stockton Town 10 13 20 -7 8
15 Rylands 9 12 13 -1 13
16 United of Manchester 9 12 19 -7 5
17 Quorn 9 12 23 -11 6
18 Hyde United 10 11 19 -8 11
19 Ashton United 9 10 9 +1 11
20 Lancaster City 9 9 17 -8 10
21 AFC Emley 9 8 15 -7 10
22 Ilkeston Town 9 6 21 -15 7