Statistics / Football / Turkey. 3. Lig - Group 1 / Tuzlaspor vs Küçükçekmece Sinopspor

Tuzlaspor vs Küçükçekmece Sinopspor Statistics & Analysis

Sep 06, 2026 - 14:00
0 1.27
1 1.33
xG Accuracy: 64%
Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Under 2.5 (1 goals) ✔ Correct
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS No No ✔ Correct
  • 1X2 Küçükçekmece Sinopspor Küçükçekmece Sinopspor ✔ Correct
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 0-1, 1-0, 1-2, 2-1 0-1 ✔ Correct

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Aug 31, 2026 · 07:27 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-6361735

Closing Odds 2.26
AI Fair Odds —
CLV +0.0%
Final Result Küçükçekmece Sinopspor win · Tuzlaspor 0–1 Küçükçekmece Sinopspor
Prediction ✔ Correct
Decision Grade A

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Market intelligence

Supporting read on how the prioritized closing feed moved versus the model — use after the Primary pick above.

Market briefing

Market remained largely stable before kickoff. No meaningful late implied-price shift was detected between PRE30 and PRE5 on the prioritized bookmaker snapshot.

Despite limited late movement, the model still prices Draw (1X2), Küçükçekmece Sinopspor (1X2), Under 2.5 goals meaningfully above what those closing snapshots implied — that gap is a static “model vs. price” read, not a late steam or chase story.

The model still exceeds closing implied on Draw (1X2) by about 3.7 percentage points — the clearest mispricing signal summarized on this page.

Model vs. closing implied

Market Model % Closing impl. % Gap (pp)
Tuzlaspor (1X2) 33.8 39.3 -5.6
Draw (1X2) 29.6 26.0 +3.7
Küçükçekmece Sinopspor (1X2) 36.6 34.7 +1.9
Over 2.5 goals 48.2 50.7 -2.5
Under 2.5 goals 51.8 49.3 +2.5
What this means

In plain terms: the model lands near 29.6% on Draw (1X2), while the closing snapshot implied about 26.0%. The difference — about 3.7 percentage points — is the largest model-vs.-market gap highlighted on this page.

Quick definitions: “closing implied” is the probability for that outcome implied by the final captured odds (after a simple de-vig). “Gap (pp)” is the model percentage minus that implied value, in percentage points (pp).

Closing-window line move

Single prioritized bookmaker per snapshot (not all books). Capture path: PRE30 → PRE5 · Book: Pinnacle

Column tags in parentheses: Closing uses the first available snapshot in PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Early uses the first available in PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 that is not the same capture as Closing.

Detailed capture odds are folded below — movement was negligible on de-vig implied prices.

View full line-by-line capture table
Market Early (PRE30) Closing (PRE5) Implied Δ (pp)
Tuzlaspor (1X2) 2.26 2.26 0.0
Draw (1X2) 3.42 3.42 0.0
Küçükçekmece Sinopspor (1X2) 2.56 2.56 0.0
Over 2.5 goals 1.83 1.83 0.0
Under 2.5 goals 1.88 1.88 0.0

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Below is a compact, numbers-first snapshot aligned with the same engine as the cards above.

  • League: 3. Lig - Group 1
  • Fixture: Tuzlaspor vs Küçükçekmece Sinopspor
  • Kickoff: 2026-09-06 14:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 33.8% · Draw 29.6% · Away 36.6%
  • xG (showing): Tuzlaspor 1.27 — Küçükçekmece Sinopspor 1.33 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
  • Value headline: None (actionable) — best tracked EV is about +1.0%, still below the +2.0% minimum for a headline / default stake (no default bet).
  • Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 51.8% · Over 2.5 48.2%); BTTS Yes (Yes 54.5% · No 45.5%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS No
  • BTTS (model): Yes 54.5% · No 45.5%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (12.5%)

The decision block shows no default Primary: Primary needs consensus EV ≥ +5.0% plus strength/reliability/calibration gates. A separate Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only). Lean labels are directional only — not bankroll-sized recommendations.

Most likely correct score stays a low-probability tail: use it for context, not as a must-bet story.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: No Primary Bet

Outcome: Validated — Pre-match lean validated against the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

October 01, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for Tuzlaspor & Küçükçekmece Sinopspor!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Statistics
3. Lig - Group 1 3. Lig - Group 1 — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Orduspor 1967 4 2 2 0 8
2 Küçükçekmece Sinopspor 4 2 2 0 8
3 Pazarspor 3 2 1 0 7
4 Tokat Bld Plevnespor 3 1 2 0 5
5 Fatsa Belediyespor 3 1 2 0 5
6 Amasyaspor 1968 3 1 2 0 5
7 Düzcespor 3 1 2 0 5
8 Karadeniz Ereğli BSK 3 1 2 0 5
9 Kartal Bulvarspor 3 1 1 1 4
10 Gölcükspor 4 1 1 2 4
11 Yalova Yeşilovaspor 3 1 1 1 4
12 Karabük İdman Yurdu 3 1 1 1 4
13 Galata 3 0 3 0 3
14 Silivrispor 3 1 0 2 3
15 İnkılapspor 3 1 0 2 3
16 Tuzlaspor 3 0 1 2 1
17 Zonguldak Kömürspor 4 0 1 3 1
18 Beykoz İshaklıspor 3 0 0 3 0
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Orduspor 1967 4 7 3 +4 8
2 Kartal Bulvarspor 3 7 4 +3 4
3 Pazarspor 3 6 1 +5 7
4 Tokat Bld Plevnespor 3 6 3 +3 5
5 Küçükçekmece Sinopspor 4 5 2 +3 8
6 Gölcükspor 4 5 5 0 4
7 Yalova Yeşilovaspor 3 5 7 -2 4
8 Fatsa Belediyespor 3 4 2 +2 5
9 Amasyaspor 1968 3 4 3 +1 5
10 Düzcespor 3 4 3 +1 5
11 İnkılapspor 3 4 8 -4 3
12 Zonguldak Kömürspor 4 4 8 -4 1
13 Karabük İdman Yurdu 3 3 6 -3 4
14 Karadeniz Ereğli BSK 3 2 1 +1 5
15 Galata 3 2 2 0 3
16 Tuzlaspor 3 2 4 -2 1
17 Silivrispor 3 2 5 -3 3
18 Beykoz İshaklıspor 3 2 7 -5 0