Statistics / Football / Peru. Liga Women / FBC Melgar W vs Defensores W

FBC Melgar W vs Defensores W Statistics & Analysis

Aug 10, 2026 - 15:00
8 1.32
0 1.28
xG Accuracy: 11%
Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (8 goals) ✖ Incorrect
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes No ✖ Incorrect
  • 1X2 FBC Melgar W FBC Melgar W ✔ Correct
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 8-0 ✖ Incorrect

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Aug 04, 2026 · 02:12 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-2971853

Closing Odds 1.3
AI Fair Odds
CLV +0.0%
Final Result FBC Melgar W win · FBC Melgar W 8–0 Defensores W
Prediction ✔ Correct
Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Market intelligence

Supporting read on how the prioritized closing feed moved versus the model — use after the Primary pick above.

Market briefing

Market remained largely stable before kickoff. No meaningful late implied-price shift was detected between PRE30 and PRE1 on the prioritized bookmaker snapshot.

Despite limited late movement, the model still prices Draw (1X2), Defensores W (1X2), Under 2.5 goals meaningfully above what those closing snapshots implied — that gap is a static “model vs. price” read, not a late steam or chase story.

The model still exceeds closing implied on Defensores W (1X2) by about 22.3 percentage points — the clearest mispricing signal summarized on this page.

Model vs. closing implied

Market Model % Closing impl. % Gap (pp)
FBC Melgar W (1X2) 36.1 69.1 -33.0
Draw (1X2) 29.7 18.9 +10.8
Defensores W (1X2) 34.2 12.0 +22.3
Over 2.5 goals 48.2 66.3 -18.1
Under 2.5 goals 51.8 33.7 +18.1
What this means

In plain terms: the model lands near 34.2% on Defensores W (1X2), while the closing snapshot implied about 12.0%. The difference — about 22.3 percentage points — is the largest model-vs.-market gap highlighted on this page.

Quick definitions: “closing implied” is the probability for that outcome implied by the final captured odds (after a simple de-vig). “Gap (pp)” is the model percentage minus that implied value, in percentage points (pp).

Closing-window line move

Single prioritized bookmaker per snapshot (not all books). Capture path: PRE30 → PRE1 · Book: Bet365

Column tags in parentheses: Closing uses the first available snapshot in PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Early uses the first available in PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 that is not the same capture as Closing.

Detailed capture odds are folded below — movement was negligible on de-vig implied prices.

View full line-by-line capture table
Market Early (PRE30) Closing (PRE1) Implied Δ (pp)
FBC Melgar W (1X2) 1.3 1.3 0.0
Draw (1X2) 4.75 4.75 0.0
Defensores W (1X2) 7.5 7.5 0.0
Over 2.5 goals 1.4 1.4 0.0
Under 2.5 goals 2.75 2.75 0.0

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Model favours FBC Melgar W; market prices FBC Melgar W instead — inputs may be missing or stale.

  • Model: FBC Melgar W 1.32 xG vs Defensores W 1.28 → FBC Melgar W 36.1%
  • Market: FBC Melgar W ~69.1% implied
  • Validation failed — do not treat 1X2 EV as actionable.

Do not act on 1X2 value until validation passes. Structural leans (O/U, BTTS) need separate odds review.

Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 51.8% · Over 2.5 48.2%); BTTS Yes (Yes 54.5% · No 45.5%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS No

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: Wait - No Primary Bet

Outcome: Validated — Pre-match lean validated against the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 16, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for FBC Melgar W & Defensores W!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Statistics
Liga Women Liga WomenStandings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 U. de Deportes W 10 9 1 0 28
2 Atl. Andahuaylas W 10 8 1 1 25
3 Sporting Cristal W 10 7 0 3 21
4 Alianza Lima W 10 6 2 2 20
5 Yanapuma W 10 5 1 4 16
6 FBC Melgar W 10 4 2 4 14
7 Flamengo FBC W 10 3 2 5 11
8 Defensores W 10 2 1 7 7
9 UNSAAC W 10 1 3 6 6
10 Killas W 10 1 2 7 5
11 Carlos Mannucci W 10 1 1 8 4
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 U. de Deportes W 10 55 4 +51 28
2 Sporting Cristal W 10 30 9 +21 21
3 Alianza Lima W 10 26 7 +19 20
4 Flamengo FBC W 10 16 21 -5 11
5 FBC Melgar W 10 15 14 +1 14
6 Yanapuma W 10 15 21 -6 16
7 Atl. Andahuaylas W 10 14 8 +6 25
8 Killas W 10 14 26 -12 5
9 Defensores W 10 11 29 -18 7
10 UNSAAC W 10 7 25 -18 6
11 Carlos Mannucci W 10 4 43 -39 4