Eibar W vs Athletic Club W Statistics & Analysis

Sep 20, 2026 - 16:00
1 1.19
0 1.41
xG Accuracy: 64%
Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Under 2.5 (1 goals) ✖ Incorrect
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes No ✖ Incorrect
  • 1X2 Athletic Club W Eibar W ✖ Incorrect
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 0-1, 1-0, 1-2, 0-0 1-0 ✔ Correct

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Sep 14, 2026 · 02:22 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-8689233

Closing Odds 1.52
AI Fair Odds —
CLV +0.0%
Final Result Eibar W win · Eibar W 1–0 Athletic Club W
Prediction ✖ Missed
Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Market intelligence

Supporting read on how the prioritized closing feed moved versus the model — use after the Primary pick above.

Market briefing

Market remained largely stable before kickoff. No meaningful late implied-price shift was detected between PRE30 and PRE5 on the prioritized bookmaker snapshot.

Despite limited late movement, the model still prices Eibar W (1X2), Draw (1X2), Over 2.5 goals meaningfully above what those closing snapshots implied — that gap is a static “model vs. price” read, not a late steam or chase story.

The model still exceeds closing implied on Eibar W (1X2) by about 14.9 percentage points — the clearest mispricing signal summarized on this page.

Model vs. closing implied

Market Model % Closing impl. % Gap (pp)
Eibar W (1X2) 30.1 15.2 +14.9
Draw (1X2) 29.4 24.5 +4.9
Athletic Club W (1X2) 40.5 60.4 -19.9
Over 2.5 goals 48.2 43.1 +5.1
Under 2.5 goals 51.8 56.9 -5.1
What this means

In plain terms: the model lands near 30.1% on Eibar W (1X2), while the closing snapshot implied about 15.2%. The difference — about 14.9 percentage points — is the largest model-vs.-market gap highlighted on this page.

Quick definitions: “closing implied” is the probability for that outcome implied by the final captured odds (after a simple de-vig). “Gap (pp)” is the model percentage minus that implied value, in percentage points (pp).

Closing-window line move

Single prioritized bookmaker per snapshot (not all books). Capture path: PRE30 → PRE5 · Book: Pinnacle

Column tags in parentheses: Closing uses the first available snapshot in PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Early uses the first available in PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 that is not the same capture as Closing.

Detailed capture odds are folded below — movement was negligible on de-vig implied prices.

View full line-by-line capture table
Market Early (PRE30) Closing (PRE5) Implied Δ (pp)
Eibar W (1X2) 6.04 6.04 0.0
Draw (1X2) 3.75 3.75 0.0
Athletic Club W (1X2) 1.52 1.52 0.0
Over 2.5 goals 2.18 2.18 0.0
Under 2.5 goals 1.65 1.65 0.0

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Below is a compact, numbers-first snapshot aligned with the same engine as the cards above.

  • League: Primera División Femenina
  • Fixture: Eibar W vs Athletic Club W
  • Kickoff: 2026-09-20 16:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 30.1% · Draw 29.4% · Away 40.5%
  • xG (showing): Eibar W 1.19 — Athletic Club W 1.41 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
  • Value headline: At least one tracked line reaches the headline EV threshold — align with the hero / Primary card if shown.
  • Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Over 2.5 (Under 2.5 51.8% · Over 2.5 48.2%); BTTS Yes (Yes 54.2% · No 45.8%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Over 2.5; BTTS Yes
  • BTTS (model): Yes 54.2% · No 45.8%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (12.5%)

When book depth is thin or odds are missing, EV may be unavailable even though the model still prefers one side on totals or BTTS — wait for cleaner prices or skip.

Most likely correct score stays a low-probability tail: use it for context, not as a must-bet story.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: AI Value Alert - No Primary Bet

Outcome: Missed — Pre-match 1X2 lean did not match the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 30, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for Eibar W & Athletic Club W!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Statistics
Primera División Femenina Primera División Femenina — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Barcelona W 5 5 0 0 15
2 Real Madrid W 5 4 1 0 13
3 Madrid CFF W 5 4 0 1 12
4 Athletic Club W 4 2 1 1 7
5 FC Levante Badalona 5 2 1 2 7
6 Eibar W 4 2 1 1 7
7 Atletico Madrid W 4 2 0 2 6
8 Edf Logrono W 5 2 0 3 6
9 Sevilla W 4 2 0 2 6
10 Granada 5 2 0 3 6
11 Deportivo Alavés 5 2 0 3 6
12 Espanyol W 4 1 1 2 4
13 Deportivo de La Coruña W 4 1 1 2 4
14 Real Sociedad W 5 0 2 3 2
15 Granad. Tenerife W 4 0 2 2 2
16 Valencia W 4 0 0 4 0
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Barcelona W 5 21 2 +19 15
2 Real Madrid W 5 13 6 +7 13
3 Madrid CFF W 5 9 7 +2 12
4 Espanyol W 4 7 5 +2 4
5 Athletic Club W 4 6 4 +2 7
6 FC Levante Badalona 5 6 5 +1 7
7 Atletico Madrid W 4 6 7 -1 6
8 Real Sociedad W 5 6 11 -5 2
9 Granada 5 5 9 -4 6
10 Edf Logrono W 5 4 5 -1 6
11 Sevilla W 4 4 6 -2 6
12 Deportivo de La Coruña W 4 3 3 0 4
13 Eibar W 4 3 4 -1 7
14 Deportivo Alavés 5 3 8 -5 6
15 Valencia W 4 3 10 -7 0
16 Granad. Tenerife W 4 2 9 -7 2