Statistics / Football / Poland. III Liga - Group 2 / Stargard Szczeciński vs Luzino

Stargard Szczeciński vs Luzino Statistics & Analysis

Aug 23, 2026 - 11:00
2 1.25
1 1.35
xG Accuracy: 74%
Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (3 goals) ✖ Incorrect
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
  • 1X2 Luzino Stargard Szczeciński ✖ Incorrect
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 0-1, 1-0, 1-2, 2-1 2-1 ✔ Correct

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Aug 17, 2026 · 01:01 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-4360427

Closing Odds 1.72
AI Fair Odds
CLV +0.0%
Final Result Stargard Szczeciński win · Stargard Szczeciński 2–1 Luzino
Prediction ✖ Missed
Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Market intelligence

Supporting read on how the prioritized closing feed moved versus the model — use after the Primary pick above.

Market briefing

Market remained largely stable before kickoff. No meaningful late implied-price shift was detected between PRE30 and PRE1 on the prioritized bookmaker snapshot.

Despite limited late movement, the model still prices Stargard Szczeciński (1X2), Draw (1X2), Under 2.5 goals meaningfully above what those closing snapshots implied — that gap is a static “model vs. price” read, not a late steam or chase story.

The model still exceeds closing implied on Under 2.5 goals by about 18.9 percentage points — the clearest mispricing signal summarized on this page.

Model vs. closing implied

Market Model % Closing impl. % Gap (pp)
Stargard Szczeciński (1X2) 32.9 25.0 +7.9
Draw (1X2) 29.6 23.4 +6.2
Luzino (1X2) 37.6 51.6 -14.1
Over 2.5 goals 48.2 67.2 -18.9
Under 2.5 goals 51.8 32.9 +18.9
What this means

In plain terms: the model lands near 51.8% on Under 2.5 goals, while the closing snapshot implied about 32.9%. The difference — about 18.9 percentage points — is the largest model-vs.-market gap highlighted on this page.

Quick definitions: “closing implied” is the probability for that outcome implied by the final captured odds (after a simple de-vig). “Gap (pp)” is the model percentage minus that implied value, in percentage points (pp).

Closing-window line move

Single prioritized bookmaker per snapshot (not all books). Capture path: PRE30 → PRE1 · Book: Pinnacle

Column tags in parentheses: Closing uses the first available snapshot in PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Early uses the first available in PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 that is not the same capture as Closing.

Detailed capture odds are folded below — movement was negligible on de-vig implied prices.

View full line-by-line capture table
Market Early (PRE30) Closing (PRE1) Implied Δ (pp)
Stargard Szczeciński (1X2) 3.55 3.55 0.0
Draw (1X2) 3.8 3.8 0.0
Luzino (1X2) 1.72 1.72 0.0
Over 2.5 goals 1.36 1.36 0.0
Under 2.5 goals 2.78 2.78 0.0

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Pre-match snapshot for this fixture.

  • League: III Liga - Group 2
  • Fixture: Stargard Szczeciński vs Luzino
  • Kickoff: 2026-08-23 11:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 32.9% · Draw 29.6% · Away 37.6%
  • xG (showing): Stargard Szczeciński 1.25 — Luzino 1.35 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
  • Best +EV line (same label as hero card when Primary thresholds are not met): Under 2.5 goals
  • Model: 51.8% · Implied: 34.9% · Probability edge: +16.9 pts · Est. EV: +45.0%
  • BTTS (model): Yes 54.5% · No 45.5%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (12.5%)

Use the cards for tiering; this text only restates the same inputs in narrative form.

1X2 can look balanced even when side markets show clearer structure.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: Selective Lean - No Primary Bet

Outcome: Missed — Pre-match 1X2 lean did not match the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 16, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for Stargard Szczeciński & Luzino!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Statistics
III Liga - Group 2 III Liga - Group 2Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Polonia Środa 7 6 1 0 19
2 Wda Świecie 7 5 2 0 17
3 Luzino 7 5 1 1 16
4 Flota Świnoujście 7 4 1 2 13
5 Kluczevia Stargard 7 4 1 2 13
6 Kalisz 7 3 3 1 12
7 Noteć Czarnków 7 4 0 3 12
8 Lech Poznań II 7 3 2 2 11
9 Stargard Szczeciński 7 3 1 3 10
10 Bałtyk Koszalin 7 2 3 2 9
11 Grom Nowy Staw 7 2 1 4 7
12 Kotwica Kórnik 7 2 1 4 7
13 Unia Swarzędz 7 2 1 4 7
14 Gedania Gdansk 7 1 3 3 6
15 Chemik Bydgoszcz 7 1 3 3 6
16 Elana Toruń 7 1 2 4 5
17 Victoria Września 7 1 1 5 4
18 Lipno Stęszew 7 0 1 6 1
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Polonia Środa 7 23 11 +12 19
2 Luzino 7 20 8 +12 16
3 Grom Nowy Staw 7 18 19 -1 7
4 Stargard Szczeciński 7 16 15 +1 10
5 Kluczevia Stargard 7 15 13 +2 13
6 Lech Poznań II 7 15 14 +1 11
7 Gedania Gdansk 7 15 19 -4 6
8 Flota Świnoujście 7 14 9 +5 13
9 Noteć Czarnków 7 14 11 +3 12
10 Wda Świecie 7 13 7 +6 17
11 Kalisz 7 13 8 +5 12
12 Kotwica Kórnik 7 12 15 -3 7
13 Chemik Bydgoszcz 7 10 15 -5 6
14 Elana Toruń 7 10 17 -7 5
15 Bałtyk Koszalin 7 8 9 -1 9
16 Unia Swarzędz 7 7 12 -5 7
17 Lipno Stęszew 7 7 16 -9 1
18 Victoria Września 7 7 19 -12 4