KSZO 1929 vs Hetman Zamosc Statistics & Analysis

KSZO 1929

Sep 27, 2026 - 16:00

1 1.44

2 1.16

xG Accuracy: 70%

Hetman Zamosc

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

Market Prediction Result Outcome
Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (3 goals) ✖ Incorrect
Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
1X2 KSZO 1929 Hetman Zamosc ✖ Incorrect
Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-0, 2-1, 0-1, 2-0 1-2 ✖ Incorrect

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Sep 21, 2026 · 02:15 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-10108796

Closing Odds 1.18

AI Fair Odds —

CLV +0.0%

Final Result Hetman Zamosc win · KSZO 1929 1–2 Hetman Zamosc

Prediction ✖ Missed

Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Market intelligence

Supporting read on how the prioritized closing feed moved versus the model — use after the Primary pick above.

Market briefing

Market remained largely stable before kickoff. No meaningful late implied-price shift was detected between PRE30 and PRE1 on the prioritized bookmaker snapshot.

Despite limited late movement, the model still prices Draw (1X2), Hetman Zamosc (1X2), Under 2.5 goals meaningfully above what those closing snapshots implied — that gap is a static “model vs. price” read, not a late steam or chase story.

The model still exceeds closing implied on Hetman Zamosc (1X2) by about 19.2 percentage points — the clearest mispricing signal summarized on this page.

Model vs. closing implied

Market	Model %	Closing impl. %	Gap (pp)
KSZO 1929 (1X2)	41.9	74.8	-33.0
Draw (1X2)	29.3	15.5	+13.8
Hetman Zamosc (1X2)	28.8	9.6	+19.2
Over 2.5 goals	48.2	64.8	-16.6
Under 2.5 goals	51.8	35.2	+16.6

What this means

In plain terms: the model lands near 28.8% on Hetman Zamosc (1X2), while the closing snapshot implied about 9.6%. The difference — about 19.2 percentage points — is the largest model-vs.-market gap highlighted on this page.

Quick definitions: “closing implied” is the probability for that outcome implied by the final captured odds (after a simple de-vig). “Gap (pp)” is the model percentage minus that implied value, in percentage points (pp).

Closing-window line move

Single prioritized bookmaker per snapshot (not all books). Capture path: PRE30 → PRE1 · Book: Pinnacle

Column tags in parentheses: Closing uses the first available snapshot in PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Early uses the first available in PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 that is not the same capture as Closing.

Detailed capture odds are folded below — movement was negligible on de-vig implied prices.

View full line-by-line capture table

Market	Early (PRE30)	Closing (PRE1)
KSZO 1929 (1X2)	1.18	1.18
Draw (1X2)	5.68	5.68
Hetman Zamosc (1X2)	9.16	9.16
Over 2.5 goals	1.4	1.4
Under 2.5 goals	2.58	2.58

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Model favours KSZO 1929; market prices KSZO 1929 instead — inputs may be missing or stale.

Model: KSZO 1929 1.44 xG vs Hetman Zamosc 1.16 → KSZO 1929 41.9%
Market: KSZO 1929 ~74.8% implied
Validation failed — do not treat 1X2 EV as actionable.

Do not act on 1X2 value until validation passes. Structural leans (O/U, BTTS) need separate odds review.

Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 51.8% · Over 2.5 48.2%); BTTS Yes (Yes 54.0% · No 46.0%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS Yes

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: Wait - No Primary Bet

Outcome: Missed — Pre-match 1X2 lean did not match the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 29, 2026 (UTC)

Explore More Predictions Content

Get Premium Predictions for KSZO 1929 & Hetman Zamosc!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now

Back to Statistics

III Liga - Group 4 — Standings

#	TEAM	MP	W	D	L	PTS
1	Chełmianka Chełm	10	8	2	0	26
2	KSZO 1929	9	5	4	0	19
3	Czarni Połaniec	10	6	1	3	19
4	Wisłoka Dębica	10	6	1	3	19
5	Wiślanie Jaśkowice	10	5	2	3	17
6	Naprzód	10	5	2	3	17
7	Jarosław	9	5	1	3	16
8	Siarka Tarnobrzeg	10	4	2	4	14
9	Wisła Kraków II	10	3	4	3	13
10	Sokół Kolb.	10	2	6	2	12
11	Podlasie Biała Podlaska	10	3	2	5	11
12	Busko-Zdroj	10	3	2	5	11
13	Hetman Zamosc	9	2	4	3	10
14	Star Starachowice	10	2	4	4	10
15	Korona Kielce II	10	2	2	6	8
16	KS Wieczysta Krakow II	10	2	2	6	8
17	Pogoń-Sokół Lubaczów	10	2	1	7	7
18	Moravia Morawica	9	2	0	7	6

#	TEAM	MP	GS	GC	+/-	PTS
1	Jarosław	9	24	15	+9	16
2	Naprzód	10	24	20	+4	17
3	Korona Kielce II	10	21	26	-5	8
4	Czarni Połaniec	10	17	15	+2	19
5	Chełmianka Chełm	10	16	3	+13	26
6	Hetman Zamosc	9	16	17	-1	10
7	Wiślanie Jaśkowice	10	15	10	+5	17
8	KSZO 1929	9	14	6	+8	19
9	Wisłoka Dębica	10	14	12	+2	19
10	Busko-Zdroj	10	14	21	-7	11
11	Siarka Tarnobrzeg	10	13	13	0	14
12	Wisła Kraków II	10	13	13	0	13
13	Star Starachowice	10	11	15	-4	10
14	Sokół Kolb.	10	10	10	0	12
15	Pogoń-Sokół Lubaczów	10	10	19	-9	7
16	KS Wieczysta Krakow II	10	9	14	-5	8
17	Moravia Morawica	9	9	18	-9	6
18	Podlasie Biała Podlaska	10	8	11	-3	11