Market intelligence
Supporting read on how the prioritized closing feed moved versus the model — use after the Primary pick above.
Market briefing
The largest late implied swing on this feed was about 0.76 percentage points on Mansfield Town (1X2) between PRE30 and PRE5.
The model still exceeds closing implied on Mansfield Town (1X2) by about 11.9 percentage points — the clearest mispricing signal summarized on this page.
Model vs. closing implied
| Market |
Model % |
Closing impl. % |
Gap (pp) |
| Mansfield Town (1X2) |
37.0 |
25.2 |
+11.9 |
| Draw (1X2) |
29.6 |
25.0 |
+4.6 |
| Sheffield Utd (1X2) |
33.4 |
49.8 |
-16.5 |
| Over 2.5 goals |
48.2 |
50.9 |
-2.7 |
| Under 2.5 goals |
51.8 |
49.1 |
+2.7 |
What this means
In plain terms: the model lands near 37.0% on Mansfield Town (1X2), while the closing snapshot implied about 25.2%. The difference — about 11.9 percentage points — is the largest model-vs.-market gap highlighted on this page.
Quick definitions: “closing implied” is the probability for that outcome implied by the final captured odds (after a simple de-vig). “Gap (pp)” is the model percentage minus that implied value, in percentage points (pp).
Closing-window line move
Single prioritized bookmaker per snapshot (not all books). Capture path:
PRE30 → PRE5
· Book:
Pinnacle
Column tags in parentheses: Closing uses the first available snapshot in PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Early uses the first available in PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 that is not the same capture as Closing.
| Market |
Early (PRE30) |
Closing (PRE5) |
Implied Δ (pp) |
| Mansfield Town (1X2) |
3.89 |
3.78 |
+0.8 |
| Draw (1X2) |
3.79 |
3.81 |
-0.1 |
| Sheffield Utd (1X2) |
1.88 |
1.91 |
-0.7 |
| Over 2.5 goals |
1.88 |
1.88 |
0.0 |
| Under 2.5 goals |
1.95 |
1.95 |
0.0 |