Statistics / Football / Belgium. Challenger Pro League / Patro Eisden vs AS Eupen

Patro Eisden vs AS Eupen Statistics & Analysis

Patro Eisden Patro Eisden
Sep 13, 2026 - 17:15
1 1.79
2 1.57
xG Accuracy: 72%
AS Eupen AS Eupen
Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Over 2.5 (3 goals) ✔ Correct
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
  • 1X2 Patro Eisden AS Eupen ✖ Incorrect
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 2-1, 1-2, 2-2, 1-0 1-2 ✔ Correct

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Sep 07, 2026 · 02:12 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-7456042

Closing Odds 3.24
AI Fair Odds —
CLV +0.0%
Final Result AS Eupen win · Patro Eisden 1–2 AS Eupen
Prediction ✖ Missed
Decision Grade C

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Market intelligence

Supporting read on how the prioritized closing feed moved versus the model — use after the Primary pick above.

Market briefing

Market remained largely stable before kickoff. No meaningful late implied-price shift was detected between PRE30 and PRE1 on the prioritized bookmaker snapshot.

Despite limited late movement, the model still prices AS Eupen (1X2), Over 2.5 goals meaningfully above what those closing snapshots implied — that gap is a static “model vs. price” read, not a late steam or chase story.

The model still exceeds closing implied on Over 2.5 goals by about 12.7 percentage points — the clearest mispricing signal summarized on this page.

Model vs. closing implied

Market Model % Closing impl. % Gap (pp)
Patro Eisden (1X2) 42.2 43.5 -1.3
Draw (1X2) 25.6 27.1 -1.5
AS Eupen (1X2) 32.2 29.4 +2.8
Over 2.5 goals 65.2 52.5 +12.7
Under 2.5 goals 34.8 47.5 -12.7
What this means

In plain terms: the model lands near 65.2% on Over 2.5 goals, while the closing snapshot implied about 52.5%. The difference — about 12.7 percentage points — is the largest model-vs.-market gap highlighted on this page.

Quick definitions: “closing implied” is the probability for that outcome implied by the final captured odds (after a simple de-vig). “Gap (pp)” is the model percentage minus that implied value, in percentage points (pp).

Closing-window line move

Single prioritized bookmaker per snapshot (not all books). Capture path: PRE30 → PRE1 · Book: Pinnacle

Column tags in parentheses: Closing uses the first available snapshot in PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Early uses the first available in PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 that is not the same capture as Closing.

Detailed capture odds are folded below — movement was negligible on de-vig implied prices.

View full line-by-line capture table
Market Early (PRE30) Closing (PRE1) Implied Δ (pp)
Patro Eisden (1X2) 2.19 2.19 0.0
Draw (1X2) 3.51 3.51 0.0
AS Eupen (1X2) 3.24 3.24 0.0
Over 2.5 goals 1.83 1.83 0.0
Under 2.5 goals 2.02 2.02 0.0

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Pre-match snapshot for this fixture.

  • League: Challenger Pro League
  • Fixture: Patro Eisden vs AS Eupen
  • Kickoff: 2026-09-13 17:15:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 42.2% · Draw 25.6% · Away 32.2%
  • xG (showing): Patro Eisden 1.79 — AS Eupen 1.57 (total xG ≈ 3.36)
  • Primary / headline line (Betting Primary Pick when shown): Over 2.5 goals
  • Model: 65.2% · Implied: 52.1% · Probability edge: +13.1 pts · Est. EV: +20.6%
  • BTTS (model): Yes N/A · No N/A
  • Correct score (top bin): N/A

Where EV is shown, it is estimated return per unit stake at the best tracked decimal price — not the same thing as a raw probability gap.

Correct score remains high-variance even when a line is most likely on paper.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: Primary Bet

Outcome: Missed — Pre-match 1X2 lean did not match the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 24, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for Patro Eisden & AS Eupen!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Statistics
Challenger Pro League Challenger Pro League — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Beerschot Wilrijk 6 5 0 1 15
2 AS Eupen 5 4 0 1 12
3 Francs Borains 5 4 0 1 12
4 Dender 5 4 0 1 12
5 Excelsior Virton 4 3 0 1 9
6 Lokeren-Temse 5 3 0 2 9
7 Sporting Hasselt 6 3 0 3 9
8 Club Brugge II 5 2 2 1 8
9 KRC Genk II 6 2 1 3 7
10 Liège 6 1 2 3 5
11 KAA Gent II 5 1 2 2 5
12 Lierse Kempenzonen 5 1 2 2 5
13 Patro Eisden 5 1 0 4 3
14 Seraing United 6 0 2 4 2
15 RSC Anderlecht II 6 0 1 5 1
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Beerschot Wilrijk 6 13 5 +8 15
2 Lokeren-Temse 5 12 10 +2 9
3 KRC Genk II 6 12 14 -2 7
4 AS Eupen 5 11 5 +6 12
5 Club Brugge II 5 11 10 +1 8
6 Liège 6 10 13 -3 5
7 Francs Borains 5 9 4 +5 12
8 Excelsior Virton 4 7 1 +6 9
9 Dender 5 7 2 +5 12
10 Patro Eisden 5 7 11 -4 3
11 RSC Anderlecht II 6 7 15 -8 1
12 KAA Gent II 5 6 9 -3 5
13 Seraing United 6 6 12 -6 2
14 Sporting Hasselt 6 4 7 -3 9
15 Lierse Kempenzonen 5 4 8 -4 5
# TEAM MP xG xGC +/- PTS
1 Excelsior Virton 4 2.0 0.7 +1.3 9
2 AS Eupen 5 1.4 1.3 +0.1 12
3 Lokeren-Temse 5 1.3 1.4 -0.1 9
4 RSC Anderlecht II 6 0.7 2.0 -1.3 1
5 Beerschot Wilrijk 6 — — — 15
6 Francs Borains 5 — — — 12
7 Dender 5 — — — 12
8 Sporting Hasselt 6 — — — 9
9 Club Brugge II 5 — — — 8
10 KRC Genk II 6 — — — 7
11 Liège 6 — — — 5
12 KAA Gent II 5 — — — 5
13 Lierse Kempenzonen 5 — — — 5
14 Patro Eisden 5 — — — 3
15 Seraing United 6 — — — 2