Statistics / Football / Belgium. Challenger Pro League / RSC Anderlecht II vs Lokeren-Temse

RSC Anderlecht II vs Lokeren-Temse Statistics & Analysis

RSC Anderlecht II RSC Anderlecht II
Sep 12, 2026 - 14:00
2 1.42
6 2.11
xG Accuracy: 29%
Lokeren-Temse Lokeren-Temse
Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Over 2.5 (8 goals) ✔ Correct
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
  • 1X2 Lokeren-Temse Lokeren-Temse ✔ Correct
  • Correct Score Insights 1-2, 1-1, 2-2, 0-2, 1-3 2-6 ✖ Incorrect

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Sep 07, 2026 · 01:41 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-7441426

Closing Odds 2.2
AI Fair Odds —
CLV +0.0%
Final Result Lokeren-Temse win · RSC Anderlecht II 2–6 Lokeren-Temse
Prediction ✔ Correct
Decision Grade A

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Market intelligence

Supporting read on how the prioritized closing feed moved versus the model — use after the Primary pick above.

Market briefing

Market remained largely stable before kickoff. No meaningful late implied-price shift was detected between PRE30 and PRE5 on the prioritized bookmaker snapshot.

Despite limited late movement, the model still prices Lokeren-Temse (1X2), Over 2.5 goals meaningfully above what those closing snapshots implied — that gap is a static “model vs. price” read, not a late steam or chase story.

The model still exceeds closing implied on Lokeren-Temse (1X2) by about 7.2 percentage points — the clearest mispricing signal summarized on this page.

Model vs. closing implied

Market Model % Closing impl. % Gap (pp)
RSC Anderlecht II (1X2) 26.0 32.6 -6.7
Draw (1X2) 23.6 24.1 -0.5
Lokeren-Temse (1X2) 50.5 43.3 +7.2
Over 2.5 goals 68.5 65.5 +3.0
Under 2.5 goals 31.5 34.5 -3.0
What this means

In plain terms: the model lands near 50.5% on Lokeren-Temse (1X2), while the closing snapshot implied about 43.3%. The difference — about 7.2 percentage points — is the largest model-vs.-market gap highlighted on this page.

Quick definitions: “closing implied” is the probability for that outcome implied by the final captured odds (after a simple de-vig). “Gap (pp)” is the model percentage minus that implied value, in percentage points (pp).

Closing-window line move

Single prioritized bookmaker per snapshot (not all books). Capture path: PRE30 → PRE5 · Book: Pinnacle

Column tags in parentheses: Closing uses the first available snapshot in PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Early uses the first available in PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 that is not the same capture as Closing.

Detailed capture odds are folded below — movement was negligible on de-vig implied prices.

View full line-by-line capture table
Market Early (PRE30) Closing (PRE5) Implied Δ (pp)
RSC Anderlecht II (1X2) 2.92 2.92 0.0
Draw (1X2) 3.96 3.96 0.0
Lokeren-Temse (1X2) 2.2 2.2 0.0
Over 2.5 goals 1.45 1.45 0.0
Under 2.5 goals 2.75 2.75 0.0

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Pre-match snapshot for this fixture.

  • League: Challenger Pro League
  • Fixture: RSC Anderlecht II vs Lokeren-Temse
  • Kickoff: 2026-09-12 14:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 26.0% · Draw 23.6% · Away 50.5%
  • xG (showing): RSC Anderlecht II 1.42 — Lokeren-Temse 2.11 (total xG ≈ 3.53)
  • Value headline: None (actionable) — best tracked EV is about +1.6%, still below the +2.0% minimum for a headline / default stake (no default bet).
  • Structural leans (not bets): Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Over 2.5; BTTS Yes
  • BTTS (model): Yes N/A · No N/A
  • Correct score (top bin): N/A

When book depth is thin or odds are missing, EV may be unavailable even though the model still prefers one side on totals or BTTS — wait for cleaner prices or skip.

If lines move materially, re-run generation or refresh — implied probabilities and any future EV readouts will change first.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: No Primary Bet

Outcome: Validated — Pre-match lean validated against the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 30, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for RSC Anderlecht II & Lokeren-Temse!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Statistics
Challenger Pro League Challenger Pro League — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Beerschot Wilrijk 6 5 0 1 15
2 Dender 6 5 0 1 15
3 AS Eupen 5 4 0 1 12
4 Francs Borains 5 4 0 1 12
5 Excelsior Virton 5 3 1 1 10
6 Lokeren-Temse 6 3 1 2 10
7 Sporting Hasselt 6 3 0 3 9
8 Club Brugge II 5 2 2 1 8
9 KRC Genk II 6 2 1 3 7
10 Liège 6 1 2 3 5
11 KAA Gent II 5 1 2 2 5
12 Lierse Kempenzonen 5 1 2 2 5
13 Patro Eisden 6 1 0 5 3
14 Seraing United 6 0 2 4 2
15 RSC Anderlecht II 6 0 1 5 1
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Beerschot Wilrijk 6 13 5 +8 15
2 Lokeren-Temse 6 13 11 +2 10
3 KRC Genk II 6 12 14 -2 7
4 AS Eupen 5 11 5 +6 12
5 Club Brugge II 5 11 10 +1 8
6 Liège 6 10 13 -3 5
7 Francs Borains 5 9 4 +5 12
8 Dender 6 8 2 +6 15
9 Excelsior Virton 5 8 2 +6 10
10 Patro Eisden 6 7 12 -5 3
11 RSC Anderlecht II 6 7 15 -8 1
12 KAA Gent II 5 6 9 -3 5
13 Seraing United 6 6 12 -6 2
14 Sporting Hasselt 6 4 7 -3 9
15 Lierse Kempenzonen 5 4 8 -4 5
# TEAM MP xG xGC +/- PTS
1 Excelsior Virton 5 2.0 0.7 +1.3 10
2 AS Eupen 5 1.4 1.3 +0.1 12
3 Lokeren-Temse 6 1.3 1.4 -0.1 10
4 RSC Anderlecht II 6 0.7 2.0 -1.3 1
5 Beerschot Wilrijk 6 — — — 15
6 Dender 6 — — — 15
7 Francs Borains 5 — — — 12
8 Sporting Hasselt 6 — — — 9
9 Club Brugge II 5 — — — 8
10 KRC Genk II 6 — — — 7
11 Liège 6 — — — 5
12 KAA Gent II 5 — — — 5
13 Lierse Kempenzonen 5 — — — 5
14 Patro Eisden 6 — — — 3
15 Seraing United 6 — — — 2