Statistics / Football / Scotland. League Two / Stirling Albion vs Clyde

Stirling Albion vs Clyde Statistics & Analysis

Sep 19, 2026 - 14:00
1 1.23
1 1.37
xG Accuracy: 85%
Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Under 2.5 (2 goals) ✔ Correct
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS No Yes ✖ Incorrect
  • 1X2 Clyde Draw ✖ Incorrect
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 0-1, 1-0, 1-2, 2-1 1-1 ✔ Correct

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Sep 14, 2026 · 01:59 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-8681332

Closing Odds 1.7
AI Fair Odds —
CLV +0.0%
Final Result Draw · Stirling Albion 1–1 Clyde
Prediction ✖ Missed
Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Market intelligence

Supporting read on how the prioritized closing feed moved versus the model — use after the Primary pick above.

Market briefing

Market remained largely stable before kickoff. No meaningful late implied-price shift was detected between PRE30 and PRE5 on the prioritized bookmaker snapshot.

Despite limited late movement, the model still prices Stirling Albion (1X2), Draw (1X2), Under 2.5 goals meaningfully above what those closing snapshots implied — that gap is a static “model vs. price” read, not a late steam or chase story.

The model still exceeds closing implied on Under 2.5 goals by about 14.2 percentage points — the clearest mispricing signal summarized on this page.

Model vs. closing implied

Market Model % Closing impl. % Gap (pp)
Stirling Albion (1X2) 31.9 24.2 +7.7
Draw (1X2) 29.6 21.8 +7.8
Clyde (1X2) 38.5 53.9 -15.5
Over 2.5 goals 48.2 62.4 -14.2
Under 2.5 goals 51.8 37.6 +14.2
What this means

In plain terms: the model lands near 51.8% on Under 2.5 goals, while the closing snapshot implied about 37.6%. The difference — about 14.2 percentage points — is the largest model-vs.-market gap highlighted on this page.

Quick definitions: “closing implied” is the probability for that outcome implied by the final captured odds (after a simple de-vig). “Gap (pp)” is the model percentage minus that implied value, in percentage points (pp).

Closing-window line move

Single prioritized bookmaker per snapshot (not all books). Capture path: PRE30 → PRE5 · Book: Pinnacle

Column tags in parentheses: Closing uses the first available snapshot in PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Early uses the first available in PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 that is not the same capture as Closing.

Detailed capture odds are folded below — movement was negligible on de-vig implied prices.

View full line-by-line capture table
Market Early (PRE30) Closing (PRE5) Implied Δ (pp)
Stirling Albion (1X2) 3.78 3.78 0.0
Draw (1X2) 4.2 4.2 0.0
Clyde (1X2) 1.7 1.7 0.0
Over 2.5 goals 1.49 1.49 0.0
Under 2.5 goals 2.47 2.47 0.0

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Pre-match snapshot for this fixture.

  • League: League Two
  • Fixture: Stirling Albion vs Clyde
  • Kickoff: 2026-09-19 14:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 31.9% · Draw 29.6% · Away 38.5%
  • xG (showing): Stirling Albion 1.23 — Clyde 1.37 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
  • Value headline: At least one tracked line reaches the headline EV threshold — align with the hero / Primary card if shown.
  • Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 51.8% · Over 2.5 48.2%); BTTS No (Yes 54.4% · No 45.6%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS No
  • BTTS (model): Yes 54.4% · No 45.6%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (12.5%)

Saying “no value” on a snapshot is a feature, not a bug: it protects readers from forcing a play when the edge is not there.

Prefer skipping to over-staking when the engine is honest about missing edge.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: No Primary Bet

Outcome: Missed — Pre-match 1X2 lean did not match the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 28, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for Stirling Albion & Clyde!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Statistics
League Two League Two — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Clyde 8 5 2 1 17
2 Stranraer 8 5 1 2 16
3 Spartans 8 3 3 2 12
4 Elgin City 8 3 2 3 11
5 Forfar Athletic 8 3 2 3 11
6 Edinburgh City 8 4 2 2 9
7 Annan Athletic 8 3 0 5 9
8 Dumbarton 8 3 0 5 9
9 Kelty Hearts 8 3 0 5 9
10 Stirling Albion 8 1 2 5 5
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Clyde 8 19 10 +9 17
2 Elgin City 8 19 14 +5 11
3 Spartans 8 19 15 +4 12
4 Edinburgh City 8 19 15 +4 9
5 Stranraer 8 17 8 +9 16
6 Kelty Hearts 8 11 18 -7 9
7 Stirling Albion 8 10 22 -12 5
8 Annan Athletic 8 9 10 -1 9
9 Forfar Athletic 8 8 13 -5 11
10 Dumbarton 8 8 14 -6 9