Statistics / Football / USA. USL Super League / Sporting JAX vs Lexington W

Sporting JAX vs Lexington W Statistics & Analysis

Sep 20, 2026 - 21:00
0 1.32
1 1.28
xG Accuracy: 64%
Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Under 2.5 (1 goals) ✖ Incorrect
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes No ✖ Incorrect
  • 1X2 Sporting JAX Lexington W ✖ Incorrect
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 0-1 ✔ Correct

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Sep 14, 2026 · 02:53 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-8699363

Closing Odds 2.2
AI Fair Odds —
CLV +0.0%
Final Result Lexington W win · Sporting JAX 0–1 Lexington W
Prediction ✖ Missed
Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Market intelligence

Supporting read on how the prioritized closing feed moved versus the model — use after the Primary pick above.

Market briefing

Market remained largely stable before kickoff. No meaningful late implied-price shift was detected between PRE30 and PRE1 on the prioritized bookmaker snapshot.

Despite limited late movement, the model still prices Draw (1X2), Lexington W (1X2), BTTS Yes meaningfully above what those closing snapshots implied — that gap is a static “model vs. price” read, not a late steam or chase story.

The model still exceeds closing implied on Lexington W (1X2) by about 3.2 percentage points — the clearest mispricing signal summarized on this page.

Model vs. closing implied

Market Model % Closing impl. % Gap (pp)
Sporting JAX (1X2) 36.1 40.9 -4.8
Draw (1X2) 29.7 28.1 +1.6
Lexington W (1X2) 34.2 31.0 +3.2
Over 2.5 goals 48.2 47.4 +0.8
Under 2.5 goals 51.8 52.6 -0.8
BTTS Yes 54.5 51.5 +3.0
BTTS No 45.5 48.5 -3.0
What this means

In plain terms: the model lands near 34.2% on Lexington W (1X2), while the closing snapshot implied about 31.0%. The difference — about 3.2 percentage points — is the largest model-vs.-market gap highlighted on this page.

Quick definitions: “closing implied” is the probability for that outcome implied by the final captured odds (after a simple de-vig). “Gap (pp)” is the model percentage minus that implied value, in percentage points (pp).

Closing-window line move

Single prioritized bookmaker per snapshot (not all books). Capture path: PRE30 → PRE1 · Book: Bet365

Column tags in parentheses: Closing uses the first available snapshot in PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Early uses the first available in PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 that is not the same capture as Closing.

Detailed capture odds are folded below — movement was negligible on de-vig implied prices.

View full line-by-line capture table
Market Early (PRE30) Closing (PRE1) Implied Δ (pp)
Sporting JAX (1X2) 2.2 2.2 0.0
Draw (1X2) 3.2 3.2 0.0
Lexington W (1X2) 2.9 2.9 0.0
Over 2.5 goals 2.0 2.0 0.0
Under 2.5 goals 1.8 1.8 0.0
BTTS Yes 1.8 1.8 0.0
BTTS No 1.91 1.91 0.0

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Pre-match snapshot for this fixture.

  • League: USL Super League
  • Fixture: Sporting JAX vs Lexington W
  • Kickoff: 2026-09-20 21:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 36.1% · Draw 29.7% · Away 34.2%
  • xG (showing): Sporting JAX 1.32 — Lexington W 1.28 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
  • Value headline: None — no positive EV on tracked lines at current best prices (same as the decision block: no default bet).
  • Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 51.8% · Over 2.5 48.2%); BTTS Yes (Yes 54.5% · No 45.5%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Over 2.5; BTTS Yes
  • BTTS (model): Yes 54.5% · No 45.5%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (12.5%)

The decision block shows no default Primary: Primary needs consensus EV ≥ +5.0% plus strength/reliability/calibration gates. A separate Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only). Lean labels are directional only — not bankroll-sized recommendations.

Most likely correct score stays a low-probability tail: use it for context, not as a must-bet story.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: No Primary Bet

Outcome: Missed — Pre-match 1X2 lean did not match the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 29, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for Sporting JAX & Lexington W!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Statistics
USL Super League USL Super League — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Carolina Ascent W 7 5 1 1 16
2 DC Power W 7 3 2 2 11
3 Sporting JAX 7 3 2 2 11
4 Dallas Trinity W 7 3 1 3 10
5 Lexington W 5 3 0 2 9
6 Tampa Bay Sun W 5 2 2 1 8
7 Fort Lauderdale United W 6 1 0 5 3
8 Brooklyn W 6 1 0 5 3
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Carolina Ascent W 7 13 6 +7 16
2 Sporting JAX 7 12 10 +2 11
3 DC Power W 7 11 8 +3 11
4 Dallas Trinity W 7 9 11 -2 10
5 Lexington W 5 8 3 +5 9
6 Tampa Bay Sun W 5 8 7 +1 8
7 Fort Lauderdale United W 6 4 10 -6 3
8 Brooklyn W 6 4 14 -10 3