Statistics / Football / Netherlands. Eerste Divisie / Roda vs Jong PSV

Roda vs Jong PSV Statistics & Analysis

Roda Roda
Oct 09, 2026 - 18:00
1 1.50
1 1.61
xG Accuracy: 74%
Jong PSV Jong PSV
Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Under 2.5 (2 goals) ✖ Incorrect
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
  • 1X2 Jong PSV Draw ✖ Incorrect
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-2, 2-1, 0-1, 1-0 1-1 ✔ Correct

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Oct 03, 2026 · 02:20 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-12702551

Closing Odds 1.46
AI Fair Odds —
CLV +0.0%
Final Result Draw · Roda 1–1 Jong PSV
Prediction ✖ Missed
Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Market intelligence

Supporting read on how the prioritized closing feed moved versus the model — use after the Primary pick above.

Market briefing

Market remained largely stable before kickoff. No meaningful late implied-price shift was detected between PRE20 and PRE1 on the prioritized bookmaker snapshot.

Despite limited late movement, the model still prices Draw (1X2), Jong PSV (1X2) meaningfully above what those closing snapshots implied — that gap is a static “model vs. price” read, not a late steam or chase story.

The model still exceeds closing implied on Jong PSV (1X2) by about 23.0 percentage points — the clearest mispricing signal summarized on this page.

Model vs. closing implied

Market Model % Closing impl. % Gap (pp)
Roda (1X2) 34.4 63.4 -29.0
Draw (1X2) 26.6 20.6 +6.0
Jong PSV (1X2) 39.0 16.1 +23.0
What this means

In plain terms: the model lands near 39.0% on Jong PSV (1X2), while the closing snapshot implied about 16.1%. The difference — about 23.0 percentage points — is the largest model-vs.-market gap highlighted on this page.

Quick definitions: “closing implied” is the probability for that outcome implied by the final captured odds (after a simple de-vig). “Gap (pp)” is the model percentage minus that implied value, in percentage points (pp).

Closing-window line move

Single prioritized bookmaker per snapshot (not all books). Capture path: PRE20 → PRE1 · Book: bet365

Column tags in parentheses: Closing uses the first available snapshot in PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Early uses the first available in PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 that is not the same capture as Closing.

Detailed capture odds are folded below — movement was negligible on de-vig implied prices.

View full line-by-line capture table
Market Early (PRE20) Closing (PRE1) Implied Δ (pp)
Roda (1X2) 1.46 1.46 0.0
Draw (1X2) 4.5 4.5 0.0
Jong PSV (1X2) 5.75 5.75 0.0

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Below is a compact, numbers-first snapshot aligned with the same engine as the cards above.

  • League: Eerste Divisie
  • Fixture: Roda vs Jong PSV
  • Kickoff: 2026-10-09 18:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 34.4% · Draw 26.6% · Away 39.1%
  • xG (showing): Roda 1.5 — Jong PSV 1.61 (total xG ≈ 3.11)
  • Best +EV line (same label as hero card when Primary thresholds are not met): Under 2.5 goals
  • Model: 39.9% · Implied: 34.6% · Probability edge: +5.3 pts · Est. EV: +9.7%
  • BTTS (model): Yes 63.6% · No 36.4%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (10.8%)

Where EV is shown, it is estimated return per unit stake at the best tracked decimal price — not the same thing as a raw probability gap.

Correct score remains high-variance even when a line is most likely on paper.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: Wait - No Primary Bet

Outcome: Missed — Pre-match 1X2 lean did not match the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

October 09, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for Roda & Jong PSV!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Statistics
Eerste Divisie Eerste Divisie — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Heracles 9 7 1 1 22
2 Almere City FC 9 6 1 2 19
3 VVV Venlo 9 6 0 3 18
4 Emmen 9 5 1 3 16
5 MVV 9 5 1 3 16
6 Roda 9 4 3 2 15
7 Waalwijk 9 3 5 1 14
8 Vitesse 9 4 2 3 14
9 NAC Breda 9 4 2 3 14
10 Jong AZ 9 4 1 4 13
11 FC Volendam 9 4 0 5 12
12 Jong PSV 9 3 3 3 12
13 FC Eindhoven 9 3 2 4 11
14 Helmond Sport 9 2 3 4 9
15 FC OSS 9 3 0 6 9
16 Den Bosch 9 2 2 5 8
17 Jong Ajax 9 2 2 5 8
18 Dordrecht 9 2 2 5 8
19 De Graafschap 9 2 2 5 8
20 Jong Utrecht 9 2 1 6 7
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Heracles 9 28 12 +16 22
2 VVV Venlo 9 23 14 +9 18
3 Jong AZ 9 22 17 +5 13
4 FC Volendam 9 20 17 +3 12
5 Almere City FC 9 19 7 +12 19
6 Waalwijk 9 19 12 +7 14
7 Emmen 9 19 18 +1 16
8 NAC Breda 9 19 19 0 14
9 Vitesse 9 15 13 +2 14
10 Helmond Sport 9 15 16 -1 9
11 FC Eindhoven 9 15 19 -4 11
12 Jong Utrecht 9 15 21 -6 7
13 Jong PSV 9 14 16 -2 12
14 Den Bosch 9 13 18 -5 8
15 MVV 9 13 19 -6 16
16 Jong Ajax 9 13 22 -9 8
17 Dordrecht 9 13 24 -11 8
18 FC OSS 9 12 14 -2 9
19 De Graafschap 9 11 22 -11 8
20 Roda 9 9 7 +2 15
# TEAM MP xG xGC +/- PTS
1 Heracles 9 12.6 6.8 +5.8 22
2 FC Volendam 9 10.7 6.4 +4.3 12
3 NAC Breda 9 10.5 7.1 +3.4 14
4 Almere City FC 9 10.0 6.6 +3.4 19
5 Emmen 9 10.4 7.2 +3.2 16
6 Den Bosch 9 10.5 7.8 +2.7 8
7 Jong PSV 9 9.9 7.2 +2.7 12
8 MVV 9 7.0 4.5 +2.5 16
9 Vitesse 9 9.3 7.8 +1.5 14
10 Roda 9 9.6 8.5 +1.1 15
11 Jong AZ 9 7.7 6.6 +1.1 13
12 FC OSS 9 8.1 8.7 -0.6 9
13 Waalwijk 9 5.5 7.0 -1.5 14
14 VVV Venlo 9 8.1 10.3 -2.2 18
15 De Graafschap 9 7.0 9.2 -2.2 8
16 Jong Ajax 9 9.8 13.2 -3.4 8
17 Jong Utrecht 9 7.0 11.2 -4.2 7
18 Helmond Sport 9 4.1 9.0 -4.9 9
19 Dordrecht 9 6.0 11.9 -5.9 8
20 FC Eindhoven 9 4.4 11.0 -6.6 11