GBK vs JS Hercules Statistics & Analysis

Jun 27, 2026 - 12:00
7 1.45
0 1.15
xG Accuracy: 16%
Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (7 goals) ✖ Incorrect
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS No No ✔ Correct
  • 1X2 GBK GBK ✔ Correct
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-0, 2-1, 0-1, 2-0 7-0 ✖ Incorrect

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Jul 23, 2026 · 14:56 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-1463747

Closing Odds 1.46
AI Fair Odds —
CLV +0.0%
Final Result GBK win · GBK 7–0 JS Hercules
Prediction ✔ Correct
Decision Grade B-

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Market intelligence

Supporting read on how the prioritized closing feed moved versus the model — use after the Primary pick above.

Market briefing

Market remained largely stable before kickoff. No meaningful late implied-price shift was detected between PRE30 and PRE1 on the prioritized bookmaker snapshot.

Despite limited late movement, the model still prices Draw (1X2), JS Hercules (1X2) meaningfully above what those closing snapshots implied — that gap is a static “model vs. price” read, not a late steam or chase story.

The model still exceeds closing implied on Draw (1X2) by about 10.2 percentage points — the clearest mispricing signal summarized on this page.

Model vs. closing implied

Market Model % Closing impl. % Gap (pp)
GBK (1X2) 42.4 62.0 -19.6
Draw (1X2) 29.2 19.0 +10.2
JS Hercules (1X2) 28.4 19.0 +9.4
What this means

In plain terms: the model lands near 29.2% on Draw (1X2), while the closing snapshot implied about 19.0%. The difference — about 10.2 percentage points — is the largest model-vs.-market gap highlighted on this page.

Quick definitions: “closing implied” is the probability for that outcome implied by the final captured odds (after a simple de-vig). “Gap (pp)” is the model percentage minus that implied value, in percentage points (pp).

Closing-window line move

Single prioritized bookmaker per snapshot (not all books). Capture path: PRE30 → PRE1 · Book: Pinnacle

Column tags in parentheses: Closing uses the first available snapshot in PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Early uses the first available in PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 that is not the same capture as Closing.

Detailed capture odds are folded below — movement was negligible on de-vig implied prices.

View full line-by-line capture table
Market Early (PRE30) Closing (PRE1) Implied Δ (pp)
GBK (1X2) 1.46 1.46 0.0
Draw (1X2) 4.76 4.76 0.0
JS Hercules (1X2) 4.75 4.75 0.0

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Below is a compact, numbers-first snapshot aligned with the same engine as the cards above.

  • League: Kakkonen - Lohko C
  • Fixture: GBK vs JS Hercules
  • Kickoff: 2026-06-27 12:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 42.4% · Draw 29.2% · Away 28.4%
  • xG (showing): GBK 1.45 — JS Hercules 1.15 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
  • Value headline: None (actionable) — best tracked EV is about +1.5%, still below the +2.0% minimum for a headline / default stake (no default bet).
  • Structural leans (not bets): Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS No
  • BTTS (model): Yes N/A · No N/A
  • Correct score (top bin): N/A

The decision block shows no default Primary: Primary needs consensus EV ≥ +5.0% plus strength/reliability/calibration gates. A separate Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only). Lean labels are directional only — not bankroll-sized recommendations.

If lines move materially, re-run generation or refresh — implied probabilities and any future EV readouts will change first.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: No Primary Bet

Outcome: Validated — Pre-match lean validated against the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 28, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for GBK & JS Hercules!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Statistics
Kakkonen - Lohko C Kakkonen - Lohko C — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Huima / Urho 18 11 3 4 36
2 GBK 18 10 2 6 32
3 JBK 18 10 1 7 31
4 VPS II 18 7 4 7 25
5 Jaro 2 18 8 1 9 25
6 Kraft 18 7 2 9 23
7 TP-47 18 6 5 7 23
8 Vaajakoski 18 6 3 9 21
9 JS Hercules 18 6 3 9 21
10 SJK-juniorit 18 5 4 9 19
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Huima / Urho 18 50 26 +24 36
2 Kraft 18 50 45 +5 23
3 VPS II 18 47 36 +11 25
4 GBK 18 43 33 +10 32
5 JBK 18 37 24 +13 31
6 Vaajakoski 18 34 44 -10 21
7 Jaro 2 18 33 54 -21 25
8 JS Hercules 18 31 42 -11 21
9 TP-47 18 28 35 -7 23
10 SJK-juniorit 18 27 41 -14 19
Kakkonen - Lohko C Finland. Kakkonen - Lohko C Predictions