Statistics / Football / Malawi. Super League / MAFCO vs Dedza Dynamos

MAFCO vs Dedza Dynamos Statistics & Analysis

Jun 20, 2026 - 12:30
3 1.34
0 1.26
xG Accuracy: 45%
Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Over 2.5 (3 goals) ✔ Correct
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes No ✖ Incorrect
  • 1X2 MAFCO MAFCO ✔ Correct
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 3-0 ✖ Incorrect

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Jul 27, 2026 · 11:26 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-2004075

Closing Odds 1.75
AI Fair Odds —
CLV +0.0%
Final Result MAFCO win · MAFCO 3–0 Dedza Dynamos
Prediction ✔ Correct
Decision Grade B-

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Market intelligence

Supporting read on how the prioritized closing feed moved versus the model — use after the Primary pick above.

Market briefing

Market remained largely stable before kickoff. No meaningful late implied-price shift was detected between PRE30 and PRE1 on the prioritized bookmaker snapshot.

Despite limited late movement, the model still prices Dedza Dynamos (1X2), Over 2.5 goals meaningfully above what those closing snapshots implied — that gap is a static “model vs. price” read, not a late steam or chase story.

The model still exceeds closing implied on Over 2.5 goals by about 13.8 percentage points — the clearest mispricing signal summarized on this page.

Model vs. closing implied

Market Model % Closing impl. % Gap (pp)
MAFCO (1X2) 41.5 51.3 -9.8
Draw (1X2) 30.1 29.7 +0.4
Dedza Dynamos (1X2) 28.3 18.9 +9.4
Over 2.5 goals 48.2 34.4 +13.8
Under 2.5 goals 51.8 65.6 -13.8
What this means

In plain terms: the model lands near 48.2% on Over 2.5 goals, while the closing snapshot implied about 34.4%. The difference — about 13.8 percentage points — is the largest model-vs.-market gap highlighted on this page.

Quick definitions: “closing implied” is the probability for that outcome implied by the final captured odds (after a simple de-vig). “Gap (pp)” is the model percentage minus that implied value, in percentage points (pp).

Closing-window line move

Single prioritized bookmaker per snapshot (not all books). Capture path: PRE30 → PRE1 · Book: Pinnacle

Column tags in parentheses: Closing uses the first available snapshot in PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Early uses the first available in PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 that is not the same capture as Closing.

Detailed capture odds are folded below — movement was negligible on de-vig implied prices.

View full line-by-line capture table
Market Early (PRE30) Closing (PRE1) Implied Δ (pp)
MAFCO (1X2) 1.74 1.75 +0.3
Draw (1X2) 2.98 3.02 -0.1
Dedza Dynamos (1X2) 4.63 4.74 -0.2
Over 2.5 goals 2.63 2.63 0.0
Under 2.5 goals 1.38 1.38 0.0

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Quick read on how the model reads this matchup.

  • League: Super League
  • Fixture: MAFCO vs Dedza Dynamos
  • Kickoff: 2026-06-20 12:30:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 41.5% · Draw 30.1% · Away 28.3%
  • xG (showing): MAFCO 1.34 — Dedza Dynamos 1.26 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
  • Primary / headline line (Betting Primary Pick when shown): BTTS Yes
  • Model: 54.5% · Implied: 39.4% · Probability edge: +15.1 pts · Est. EV: +30.3%
  • BTTS (model): Yes N/A · No N/A
  • Correct score (top bin): N/A

Use the cards for tiering; this text only restates the same inputs in narrative form.

1X2 can look balanced even when side markets show clearer structure.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: Primary Bet

Outcome: Validated — Pre-match lean validated against the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 28, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for MAFCO & Dedza Dynamos!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Statistics
Super League Super League — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Blue Eagles 15 10 1 4 31
2 Nyasa Big Bullets 15 8 6 1 30
3 Be Forward Wanderers 15 8 5 2 29
4 Silver Strikers 15 8 5 2 29
5 Masters FC 15 6 4 5 22
6 Moyale Barracks 15 5 6 4 21
7 Chitipa United 15 6 3 6 21
8 Mitundu Baptist 15 5 5 5 20
9 Red Lions 15 5 5 5 20
10 CIVO United 15 6 2 7 20
11 Ekhaya 15 4 6 5 18
12 Dedza Dynamos 15 3 6 6 15
13 Karonga United 15 3 5 7 14
14 MAFCO 15 3 4 8 13
15 Kamuzu Barracks 15 3 3 9 12
16 Creck 15 2 4 9 10
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Be Forward Wanderers 15 27 11 +16 29
2 Blue Eagles 15 24 16 +8 31
3 Silver Strikers 15 23 10 +13 29
4 Nyasa Big Bullets 15 20 7 +13 30
5 Masters FC 15 17 16 +1 22
6 Moyale Barracks 15 16 17 -1 21
7 Ekhaya 15 15 14 +1 18
8 Kamuzu Barracks 15 15 22 -7 12
9 Karonga United 15 14 23 -9 14
10 Mitundu Baptist 15 12 13 -1 20
11 Red Lions 15 12 13 -1 20
12 MAFCO 15 12 17 -5 13
13 Chitipa United 15 11 16 -5 21
14 Creck 15 11 20 -9 10
15 CIVO United 15 10 14 -4 20
16 Dedza Dynamos 15 9 19 -10 15