Angust Nazran vs Astrakhan Statistics & Analysis

Angust Nazran

Sep 26, 2026 - 12:00

0 1.25

1 1.35

xG Accuracy: 64%

Astrakhan

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

Market Prediction Result Outcome
Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Under 2.5 (1 goals) ✖ Incorrect
Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes No ✖ Incorrect
1X2 Astrakhan Astrakhan ✔ Correct
Correct Score Insights 1-1, 0-1, 1-0, 1-2, 2-1 0-1 ✔ Correct

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Sep 21, 2026 · 00:58 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-10082685

Closing Odds 2.67

AI Fair Odds —

CLV +0.0%

Final Result Astrakhan win · Angust Nazran 0–1 Astrakhan

Prediction ✔ Correct

Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Market intelligence

Supporting read on how the prioritized closing feed moved versus the model — use after the Primary pick above.

Market briefing

Market remained largely stable before kickoff. No meaningful late implied-price shift was detected between PRE30 and PRE5 on the prioritized bookmaker snapshot.

Despite limited late movement, the model still prices BTTS Yes meaningfully above what those closing snapshots implied — that gap is a static “model vs. price” read, not a late steam or chase story.

The model still exceeds closing implied on BTTS Yes by about 1.6 percentage points — the clearest mispricing signal summarized on this page.

Model vs. closing implied

Market	Model %	Closing impl. %	Gap (pp)
Angust Nazran (1X2)	32.9	33.4	-0.5
Draw (1X2)	29.6	29.2	+0.4
Astrakhan (1X2)	37.6	37.4	+0.1
Over 2.5 goals	48.2	47.5	+0.7
Under 2.5 goals	51.8	52.5	-0.7
BTTS Yes	54.5	52.9	+1.6
BTTS No	45.5	47.1	-1.6

What this means

In plain terms: the model lands near 54.5% on BTTS Yes, while the closing snapshot implied about 52.9%. The difference — about 1.6 percentage points — is the largest model-vs.-market gap highlighted on this page.

Quick definitions: “closing implied” is the probability for that outcome implied by the final captured odds (after a simple de-vig). “Gap (pp)” is the model percentage minus that implied value, in percentage points (pp).

Closing-window line move

Single prioritized bookmaker per snapshot (not all books). Capture path: PRE30 → PRE5 · Book: Marathonbet

Column tags in parentheses: Closing uses the first available snapshot in PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Early uses the first available in PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 that is not the same capture as Closing.

Detailed capture odds are folded below — movement was negligible on de-vig implied prices.

View full line-by-line capture table

Market	Early (PRE30)	Closing (PRE5)
Angust Nazran (1X2)	2.67	2.67
Draw (1X2)	3.05	3.05
Astrakhan (1X2)	2.38	2.38
Over 2.5 goals	1.93	1.93
Under 2.5 goals	1.75	1.75
BTTS Yes	1.72	1.72
BTTS No	1.93	1.93

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Pre-match snapshot for this fixture.

League: Second League - Group 1
Fixture: Angust Nazran vs Astrakhan
Kickoff: 2026-09-26 12:00:00
1X2 (model): Home 32.9% · Draw 29.6% · Away 37.6%
xG (showing): Angust Nazran 1.25 — Astrakhan 1.35 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
Value headline: None — no positive EV on tracked lines at current best prices (same as the decision block: no default bet).
Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 51.8% · Over 2.5 48.2%); BTTS Yes (Yes 54.5% · No 45.5%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Over 2.5; BTTS Yes
BTTS (model): Yes 54.5% · No 45.5%
Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (12.5%)

Saying “no value” on a snapshot is a feature, not a bug: it protects readers from forcing a play when the edge is not there.

If lines move materially, re-run generation or refresh — implied probabilities and any future EV readouts will change first.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: No Primary Bet

Outcome: Validated — Pre-match lean validated against the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 29, 2026 (UTC)

Explore More Predictions Content

Get Premium Predictions for Angust Nazran & Astrakhan!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now

Back to Statistics

Second League - Group 1 — Standings

#	TEAM	MP	W	D	L	PTS
1	Sevastopol	21	16	2	3	50
2	Shahter Taganrog	21	14	4	3	46
3	Rostov II	21	14	4	3	46
4	Rubin Yalta	20	9	7	4	34
5	Pobeda	20	10	3	7	33
6	Kyzyltash	21	9	4	8	31
7	Nart Cherkessk	20	9	3	8	30
8	Spartak Nalchik	20	7	7	6	28
9	Druzhba	20	7	6	7	27
10	Lugansk	21	6	6	9	24
11	Astrakhan	20	5	5	10	20
12	Izberbash	21	6	0	15	18
13	Angust Nazran	20	4	4	12	16
14	FK Chayka 2	21	4	2	15	14
15	Dynamo Makhachkala II	21	3	5	13	14
16	PSK Dinskaya	0	0	0	0	0

#	TEAM	MP	GS	GC	+/-	PTS
1	Rostov II	21	45	16	+29	46
2	Shahter Taganrog	21	42	20	+22	46
3	Sevastopol	21	38	17	+21	50
4	Pobeda	20	38	27	+11	33
5	Kyzyltash	21	36	30	+6	31
6	Rubin Yalta	20	29	19	+10	34
7	Nart Cherkessk	20	27	19	+8	30
8	Spartak Nalchik	20	27	20	+7	28
9	Lugansk	21	24	30	-6	24
10	Druzhba	20	23	25	-2	27
11	Astrakhan	20	22	32	-10	20
12	Dynamo Makhachkala II	21	19	39	-20	14
13	Izberbash	21	19	57	-38	18
14	FK Chayka 2	21	17	43	-26	14
15	Angust Nazran	20	9	21	-12	16
16	PSK Dinskaya	0	0	0	0	0