Statistics / Football / Norway. 1. Division Women / Åsane W vs Frigg Oslo FK W

Åsane W vs Frigg Oslo FK W Statistics & Analysis

Sep 13, 2026 - 11:30
4 1.34
0 1.26
xG Accuracy: 34%
Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (4 goals) ✖ Incorrect
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes No ✖ Incorrect
  • 1X2 Åsane W Åsane W ✔ Correct
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 4-0 ✖ Incorrect

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Sep 07, 2026 · 01:09 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-7427114

Closing Odds 1.2
AI Fair Odds —
CLV +0.0%
Final Result Åsane W win · Åsane W 4–0 Frigg Oslo FK W
Prediction ✔ Correct
Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Market intelligence

Supporting read on how the prioritized closing feed moved versus the model — use after the Primary pick above.

Market briefing

Market remained largely stable before kickoff. No meaningful late implied-price shift was detected between PRE30 and PRE1 on the prioritized bookmaker snapshot.

Despite limited late movement, the model still prices Draw (1X2), Frigg Oslo FK W (1X2), Under 2.5 goals meaningfully above what those closing snapshots implied — that gap is a static “model vs. price” read, not a late steam or chase story.

The model still exceeds closing implied on Frigg Oslo FK W (1X2) by about 23.4 percentage points — the clearest mispricing signal summarized on this page.

Model vs. closing implied

Market Model % Closing impl. % Gap (pp)
Åsane W (1X2) 37.0 75.0 -38.0
Draw (1X2) 29.6 15.0 +14.6
Frigg Oslo FK W (1X2) 33.4 10.0 +23.4
Over 2.5 goals 48.2 66.3 -18.1
Under 2.5 goals 51.8 33.7 +18.1
What this means

In plain terms: the model lands near 33.4% on Frigg Oslo FK W (1X2), while the closing snapshot implied about 10.0%. The difference — about 23.4 percentage points — is the largest model-vs.-market gap highlighted on this page.

Quick definitions: “closing implied” is the probability for that outcome implied by the final captured odds (after a simple de-vig). “Gap (pp)” is the model percentage minus that implied value, in percentage points (pp).

Closing-window line move

Single prioritized bookmaker per snapshot (not all books). Capture path: PRE30 → PRE1 · Book: Bet365

Column tags in parentheses: Closing uses the first available snapshot in PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Early uses the first available in PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 that is not the same capture as Closing.

Detailed capture odds are folded below — movement was negligible on de-vig implied prices.

View full line-by-line capture table
Market Early (PRE30) Closing (PRE1) Implied Δ (pp)
Åsane W (1X2) 1.2 1.2 0.0
Draw (1X2) 6.0 6.0 0.0
Frigg Oslo FK W (1X2) 9.0 9.0 0.0
Over 2.5 goals 1.4 1.4 0.0
Under 2.5 goals 2.75 2.75 0.0

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Model favours Åsane W; market prices Åsane W instead — inputs may be missing or stale.

  • Model: Åsane W 1.34 xG vs Frigg Oslo FK W 1.26 → Åsane W 37.1%
  • Market: Åsane W ~75.0% implied
  • Validation failed — do not treat 1X2 EV as actionable.

Do not act on 1X2 value until validation passes. Structural leans (O/U, BTTS) need separate odds review.

Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 51.8% · Over 2.5 48.2%); BTTS Yes (Yes 54.5% · No 45.5%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS Yes

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: Wait - No Primary Bet

Outcome: Validated — Pre-match lean validated against the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

October 01, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for Åsane W & Frigg Oslo FK W!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Statistics
1. Division Women 1. Division Women — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Start W 8 6 2 0 20
2 Viking FK 8 6 1 1 19
3 Åsane W 8 5 3 0 18
4 TIL 2020 W 8 5 2 1 17
5 Arna-Bjørnar W 8 4 2 2 14
6 Bryne W 8 3 2 3 11
7 Odd 8 2 3 3 9
8 Kolbotn W 8 2 2 4 8
9 Grei 8 2 1 5 7
10 Klepp W 8 2 0 6 6
11 Frigg Oslo FK W 8 1 0 7 3
12 Fyllingsdalen W 8 1 0 7 3
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Viking FK 8 25 7 +18 19
2 TIL 2020 W 8 19 5 +14 17
3 Åsane W 8 17 6 +11 18
4 Start W 8 17 8 +9 20
5 Grei 8 16 18 -2 7
6 Arna-Bjørnar W 8 13 9 +4 14
7 Kolbotn W 8 11 12 -1 8
8 Klepp W 8 11 26 -15 6
9 Odd 8 9 10 -1 9
10 Fyllingsdalen W 8 9 27 -18 3
11 Bryne W 8 7 9 -2 11
12 Frigg Oslo FK W 8 4 21 -17 3