Statistics / Football / Australia. Western Australia State League 1 / UWA Nedlands vs Subiaco

UWA Nedlands vs Subiaco Statistics & Analysis

UWA Nedlands UWA Nedlands
Aug 15, 2026 - 07:00
0 1.45
2 1.15
xG Accuracy: 53%
Subiaco Subiaco
Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Under 2.5 (2 goals) ✔ Correct
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes No ✖ Incorrect
  • 1X2 UWA Nedlands Subiaco ✖ Incorrect
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-0, 2-1, 0-1, 2-0 0-2 ✖ Incorrect

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Aug 09, 2026 · 00:58 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-3335718

Closing Odds 1.29
AI Fair Odds —
CLV +0.0%
Final Result Subiaco win · UWA Nedlands 0–2 Subiaco
Prediction ✖ Missed
Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Market intelligence

Supporting read on how the prioritized closing feed moved versus the model — use after the Primary pick above.

Market briefing

Market remained largely stable before kickoff. No meaningful late implied-price shift was detected between PRE30 and PRE1 on the prioritized bookmaker snapshot.

Despite limited late movement, the model still prices Draw (1X2), Subiaco (1X2) meaningfully above what those closing snapshots implied — that gap is a static “model vs. price” read, not a late steam or chase story.

The model still exceeds closing implied on Subiaco (1X2) by about 15.0 percentage points — the clearest mispricing signal summarized on this page.

Model vs. closing implied

Market Model % Closing impl. % Gap (pp)
UWA Nedlands (1X2) 42.4 69.6 -27.2
Draw (1X2) 29.2 17.1 +12.2
Subiaco (1X2) 28.4 13.4 +15.0
What this means

In plain terms: the model lands near 28.4% on Subiaco (1X2), while the closing snapshot implied about 13.4%. The difference — about 15.0 percentage points — is the largest model-vs.-market gap highlighted on this page.

Quick definitions: “closing implied” is the probability for that outcome implied by the final captured odds (after a simple de-vig). “Gap (pp)” is the model percentage minus that implied value, in percentage points (pp).

Closing-window line move

Single prioritized bookmaker per snapshot (not all books). Capture path: PRE30 → PRE1 · Book: Pinnacle

Column tags in parentheses: Closing uses the first available snapshot in PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Early uses the first available in PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 that is not the same capture as Closing.

Detailed capture odds are folded below — movement was negligible on de-vig implied prices.

View full line-by-line capture table
Market Early (PRE30) Closing (PRE1) Implied Δ (pp)
UWA Nedlands (1X2) 1.29 1.29 0.0
Draw (1X2) 5.26 5.26 0.0
Subiaco (1X2) 6.71 6.71 0.0

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Below is a compact, numbers-first snapshot aligned with the same engine as the cards above.

  • League: Western Australia State League 1
  • Fixture: UWA Nedlands vs Subiaco
  • Kickoff: 2026-08-15 07:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 42.4% · Draw 29.2% · Away 28.4%
  • xG (showing): UWA Nedlands 1.45 — Subiaco 1.15 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
  • Value headline: At least one tracked line reaches the headline EV threshold — align with the hero / Primary card if shown.
  • Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 51.8% · Over 2.5 48.2%); BTTS Yes (Yes 53.9% · No 46.1%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS No
  • BTTS (model): Yes 53.9% · No 46.1%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (12.4%)

When book depth is thin or odds are missing, EV may be unavailable even though the model still prefers one side on totals or BTTS — wait for cleaner prices or skip.

Prefer skipping to over-staking when the engine is honest about missing edge.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: Wait - No Primary Bet

Outcome: Missed — Pre-match 1X2 lean did not match the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 30, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for UWA Nedlands & Subiaco!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Statistics
Western Australia State League 1 Western Australia State League 1 — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Floreat Athena 21 15 4 2 49
2 UWA Nedlands 22 14 2 6 44
3 Mandurah City 22 11 3 8 36
4 Joondalup City 22 11 3 8 36
5 Quinns FC 21 11 3 7 36
6 Inglewood United 22 9 6 7 33
7 Kingsley Westside 22 10 2 10 32
8 Gwelup Croatia 22 6 7 9 25
9 Cockburn City 22 6 5 11 23
10 Murdoch Melville 22 5 7 10 22
11 Subiaco 22 6 2 14 20
12 Curtin University 22 3 4 15 13
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Floreat Athena 21 56 24 +32 49
2 Mandurah City 22 47 39 +8 36
3 UWA Nedlands 22 45 28 +17 44
4 Kingsley Westside 22 38 33 +5 32
5 Murdoch Melville 22 38 46 -8 22
6 Joondalup City 22 36 32 +4 36
7 Subiaco 22 36 46 -10 20
8 Gwelup Croatia 22 36 47 -11 25
9 Quinns FC 21 34 36 -2 36
10 Cockburn City 22 34 49 -15 23
11 Inglewood United 22 26 24 +2 33
12 Curtin University 22 19 41 -22 13