Statistics / Football / Australia. Queensland NPL / Magic United vs Brisbane City

Magic United vs Brisbane City Statistics & Analysis

Magic United Magic United
Jun 27, 2026 - 04:30
3 1.29
5 1.31
xG Accuracy: 23%
Brisbane City Brisbane City
Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (8 goals) ✖ Incorrect
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS No Yes ✖ Incorrect
  • 1X2 Brisbane City Brisbane City ✔ Correct
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 0-1, 1-0, 1-2, 2-1 3-5 ✖ Incorrect

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Jul 23, 2026 · 14:16 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-1458001

Closing Odds 1.48
AI Fair Odds —
CLV +0.0%
Final Result Brisbane City win · Magic United 3–5 Brisbane City
Prediction ✔ Correct
Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Market intelligence

Supporting read on how the prioritized closing feed moved versus the model — use after the Primary pick above.

Market briefing

Market remained largely stable before kickoff. No meaningful late implied-price shift was detected between PRE30 and PRE1 on the prioritized bookmaker snapshot.

Despite limited late movement, the model still prices Magic United (1X2), Draw (1X2) meaningfully above what those closing snapshots implied — that gap is a static “model vs. price” read, not a late steam or chase story.

The model still exceeds closing implied on Magic United (1X2) by about 10.0 percentage points — the clearest mispricing signal summarized on this page.

Model vs. closing implied

Market Model % Closing impl. % Gap (pp)
Magic United (1X2) 29.9 19.9 +10.0
Draw (1X2) 26.7 18.1 +8.5
Brisbane City (1X2) 43.5 62.0 -18.5
What this means

In plain terms: the model lands near 29.9% on Magic United (1X2), while the closing snapshot implied about 19.9%. The difference — about 10.0 percentage points — is the largest model-vs.-market gap highlighted on this page.

Quick definitions: “closing implied” is the probability for that outcome implied by the final captured odds (after a simple de-vig). “Gap (pp)” is the model percentage minus that implied value, in percentage points (pp).

Closing-window line move

Single prioritized bookmaker per snapshot (not all books). Capture path: PRE30 → PRE1 · Book: Pinnacle

Column tags in parentheses: Closing uses the first available snapshot in PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Early uses the first available in PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 that is not the same capture as Closing.

Detailed capture odds are folded below — movement was negligible on de-vig implied prices.

View full line-by-line capture table
Market Early (PRE30) Closing (PRE1) Implied Δ (pp)
Magic United (1X2) 4.61 4.61 0.0
Draw (1X2) 5.06 5.06 0.0
Brisbane City (1X2) 1.48 1.48 0.0

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Quick read on how the model reads this matchup.

  • League: Queensland NPL
  • Fixture: Magic United vs Brisbane City
  • Kickoff: 2026-06-27 04:30:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 29.8% · Draw 26.7% · Away 43.5%
  • xG (showing): Magic United 1.29 — Brisbane City 1.31 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
  • Value headline: None (actionable) — best tracked EV is about +1.1%, still below the +2.0% minimum for a headline / default stake (no default bet).
  • Structural leans (not bets): Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS No
  • BTTS (model): Yes N/A · No N/A
  • Correct score (top bin): N/A

When book depth is thin or odds are missing, EV may be unavailable even though the model still prefers one side on totals or BTTS — wait for cleaner prices or skip.

Prefer skipping to over-staking when the engine is honest about missing edge.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: No Primary Bet

Outcome: Validated — Pre-match lean validated against the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 30, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for Magic United & Brisbane City!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Statistics
Queensland NPL Queensland NPL — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Lions 22 17 2 3 53
2 Peninsula Power 22 13 6 3 45
3 Moreton City Excelsior 22 12 3 7 39
4 Gold Coast Knights 22 11 5 6 38
5 Brisbane City 22 9 7 6 34
6 WDSC Wolves 22 9 6 7 33
7 Eastern Suburbs 22 9 2 11 29
8 Olympic 22 8 2 12 26
9 Magic United 22 7 1 14 22
10 Rochedale Rovers 22 6 3 13 21
11 Gold Coast United 22 6 2 14 20
12 Brisbane Roar II 22 5 1 16 16
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Lions 22 57 22 +35 53
2 Moreton City Excelsior 22 51 35 +16 39
3 Peninsula Power 22 49 27 +22 45
4 Brisbane City 22 47 48 -1 34
5 Gold Coast Knights 22 46 32 +14 38
6 Olympic 22 39 43 -4 26
7 WDSC Wolves 22 36 40 -4 33
8 Eastern Suburbs 22 34 35 -1 29
9 Rochedale Rovers 22 34 52 -18 21
10 Magic United 22 33 59 -26 22
11 Brisbane Roar II 22 32 52 -20 16
12 Gold Coast United 22 26 39 -13 20