Statistics / Football / Ecuador. Liga Pro / LDU de Quito vs Emelec

LDU de Quito vs Emelec Statistics & Analysis

LDU de Quito LDU de Quito
Aug 24, 2026 - 00:00
2 1.37
0 1.19
xG Accuracy: 61%
Emelec Emelec
Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Under 2.5 (2 goals) ✔ Correct
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes No ✖ Incorrect
  • 1X2 LDU de Quito LDU de Quito ✔ Correct
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 0-0 2-0 ✖ Incorrect

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Aug 18, 2026 · 02:12 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-4454450

Closing Odds 1.58
AI Fair Odds —
CLV +0.0%
Final Result LDU de Quito win · LDU de Quito 2–0 Emelec
Prediction ✔ Correct
Decision Grade B-

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): +37.5%

Market intelligence

Supporting read on how the prioritized closing feed moved versus the model — use after the Primary pick above.

Market briefing

Market remained largely stable before kickoff. No meaningful late implied-price shift was detected between PRE30 and PRE1 on the prioritized bookmaker snapshot.

Despite limited late movement, the model still prices Draw (1X2), Emelec (1X2) meaningfully above what those closing snapshots implied — that gap is a static “model vs. price” read, not a late steam or chase story.

The model still exceeds closing implied on Emelec (1X2) by about 14.9 percentage points — the clearest mispricing signal summarized on this page.

Model vs. closing implied

Market Model % Closing impl. % Gap (pp)
LDU de Quito (1X2) 39.4 60.0 -20.6
Draw (1X2) 29.8 24.1 +5.7
Emelec (1X2) 30.9 16.0 +14.9
Over 2.5 goals 47.1 47.0 +0.1
Under 2.5 goals 52.8 53.0 -0.2
What this means

In plain terms: the model lands near 30.9% on Emelec (1X2), while the closing snapshot implied about 16.0%. The difference — about 14.9 percentage points — is the largest model-vs.-market gap highlighted on this page.

Quick definitions: “closing implied” is the probability for that outcome implied by the final captured odds (after a simple de-vig). “Gap (pp)” is the model percentage minus that implied value, in percentage points (pp).

Closing-window line move

Single prioritized bookmaker per snapshot (not all books). Capture path: PRE30 → PRE1 · Book: Pinnacle

Column tags in parentheses: Closing uses the first available snapshot in PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Early uses the first available in PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 that is not the same capture as Closing.

Detailed capture odds are folded below — movement was negligible on de-vig implied prices.

View full line-by-line capture table
Market Early (PRE30) Closing (PRE1) Implied Δ (pp)
LDU de Quito (1X2) 1.58 1.58 0.0
Draw (1X2) 3.94 3.94 0.0
Emelec (1X2) 5.94 5.94 0.0
Over 2.5 goals 2.04 2.04 0.0
Under 2.5 goals 1.81 1.81 0.0

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Pre-match snapshot for this fixture.

  • League: Liga Pro
  • Fixture: LDU de Quito vs Emelec
  • Kickoff: 2026-08-24 00:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 39.4% · Draw 29.8% · Away 30.9%
  • xG (showing): LDU de Quito 1.37 — Emelec 1.19 (total xG ≈ 2.56)
  • Value headline: At least one tracked line reaches the headline EV threshold — align with the hero / Primary card if shown.
  • Structural leans (not bets): Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS Yes
  • BTTS (model): Yes N/A · No N/A
  • Correct score (top bin): N/A

When book depth is thin or odds are missing, EV may be unavailable even though the model still prefers one side on totals or BTTS — wait for cleaner prices or skip.

Most likely correct score stays a low-probability tail: use it for context, not as a must-bet story.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: Wait - No Primary Bet

Outcome: Validated — Pre-match lean validated against the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 15, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for LDU de Quito & Emelec!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Statistics
Liga Pro Liga Pro — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Independiente del Valle 30 24 2 4 74
2 Macara 30 15 6 9 51
3 Aucas 30 14 8 8 50
4 Universidad Catolica 29 13 9 7 48
5 LDU de Quito 30 13 7 10 46
6 Barcelona SC 30 11 11 8 44
7 Libertad 30 11 8 11 41
8 Leones del Norte 30 10 9 11 39
9 Guayaquil City FC 30 10 9 11 39
10 Mushuc Runa SC 30 9 11 10 38
11 Emelec 30 10 9 11 36
12 Deportivo Cuenca 30 10 6 14 36
13 Orense SC 29 9 6 14 33
14 Tecnico Universitario 30 10 2 18 32
15 Delfin SC 30 7 7 16 28
16 Manta FC 30 5 6 19 21
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Independiente del Valle 30 73 33 +40 74
2 Universidad Catolica 29 49 26 +23 48
3 Macara 30 41 33 +8 51
4 Mushuc Runa SC 30 35 38 -3 38
5 Orense SC 29 35 45 -10 33
6 Aucas 30 33 28 +5 50
7 Libertad 30 33 34 -1 41
8 Guayaquil City FC 30 33 36 -3 39
9 Barcelona SC 30 32 25 +7 44
10 LDU de Quito 30 31 24 +7 46
11 Leones del Norte 30 31 32 -1 39
12 Tecnico Universitario 30 28 42 -14 32
13 Emelec 30 25 34 -9 36
14 Deportivo Cuenca 30 25 37 -12 36
15 Delfin SC 30 19 31 -12 28
16 Manta FC 30 17 42 -25 21
# TEAM MP xG xGC +/- PTS
1 Emelec 30 3.0 0.8 +2.2 36
2 Aucas 30 2.9 1.6 +1.3 50
3 LDU de Quito 30 4.2 3.1 +1.1 46
4 Macara 30 3.0 2.0 +1.0 51
5 Universidad Catolica 29 2.3 1.4 +0.9 48
6 Leones del Norte 30 2.6 1.9 +0.7 39
7 Mushuc Runa SC 30 2.3 1.7 +0.6 38
8 Delfin SC 30 1.7 1.4 +0.3 28
9 Guayaquil City FC 30 1.4 1.7 -0.3 39
10 Barcelona SC 30 3.4 4.1 -0.7 44
11 Manta FC 30 0.5 1.3 -0.8 21
12 Tecnico Universitario 30 0.6 1.7 -1.1 32
13 Orense SC 29 0.3 1.8 -1.5 33
14 Libertad 30 0.3 2.0 -1.7 41
15 Deportivo Cuenca 30 3.3 5.3 -2.0 36
16 Independiente del Valle 30 — — — 74