Laagri vs Paide Statistics & Analysis

Jul 19, 2026 - 16:00
5 1.19
2 1.41
xG Accuracy: 30%
Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (7 goals) ✖ Incorrect
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS No Yes ✖ Incorrect
  • 1X2 Paide Laagri ✖ Incorrect
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 0-1, 1-0, 1-2, 0-0 5-2 ✖ Incorrect

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Jul 24, 2026 · 04:30 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-1551527

Closing Odds 2.03
AI Fair Odds —
CLV +0.0%
Final Result Laagri win · Laagri 5–2 Paide
Prediction ✖ Missed
Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Market intelligence

Supporting read on how the prioritized closing feed moved versus the model — use after the Primary pick above.

Market briefing

Market remained largely stable before kickoff. No meaningful late implied-price shift was detected between PRE30 and PRE1 on the prioritized bookmaker snapshot.

Despite limited late movement, the model still prices Draw (1X2), Under 2.5 goals meaningfully above what those closing snapshots implied — that gap is a static “model vs. price” read, not a late steam or chase story.

The model still exceeds closing implied on Under 2.5 goals by about 10.7 percentage points — the clearest mispricing signal summarized on this page.

Model vs. closing implied

Market Model % Closing impl. % Gap (pp)
Laagri (1X2) 30.1 29.9 +0.2
Draw (1X2) 29.4 24.4 +5.0
Paide (1X2) 40.5 45.7 -5.2
Over 2.5 goals 48.2 58.9 -10.7
Under 2.5 goals 51.8 41.1 +10.7
What this means

In plain terms: the model lands near 51.8% on Under 2.5 goals, while the closing snapshot implied about 41.1%. The difference — about 10.7 percentage points — is the largest model-vs.-market gap highlighted on this page.

Quick definitions: “closing implied” is the probability for that outcome implied by the final captured odds (after a simple de-vig). “Gap (pp)” is the model percentage minus that implied value, in percentage points (pp).

Closing-window line move

Single prioritized bookmaker per snapshot (not all books). Capture path: PRE30 → PRE1 · Book: Pinnacle

Column tags in parentheses: Closing uses the first available snapshot in PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Early uses the first available in PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 that is not the same capture as Closing.

Detailed capture odds are folded below — movement was negligible on de-vig implied prices.

View full line-by-line capture table
Market Early (PRE30) Closing (PRE1) Implied Δ (pp)
Laagri (1X2) 3.1 3.1 0.0
Draw (1X2) 3.8 3.8 0.0
Paide (1X2) 2.03 2.03 0.0
Over 2.5 goals 1.59 1.59 0.0
Under 2.5 goals 2.28 2.28 0.0

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Pre-match snapshot for this fixture.

  • League: Meistriliiga
  • Fixture: Laagri vs Paide
  • Kickoff: 2026-07-19 16:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 30.1% · Draw 29.4% · Away 40.5%
  • xG (showing): Laagri 1.19 — Paide 1.41 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
  • Primary / headline line (Betting Primary Pick when shown): Under 2.5 goals
  • Model: 51.8% · Implied: 41.6% · Probability edge: +10.2 pts · Est. EV: +18.1%
  • BTTS (model): Yes N/A · No N/A
  • Correct score (top bin): N/A

Use the cards for tiering; this text only restates the same inputs in narrative form.

Correct score remains high-variance even when a line is most likely on paper.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: Primary Bet

Outcome: Missed — Pre-match 1X2 lean did not match the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 28, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for Laagri & Paide!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Statistics
Meistriliiga Meistriliiga — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 FC Levadia Tallinn 29 22 6 1 72
2 Flora Tallinn 29 18 1 10 55
3 Paide 29 15 6 8 51
4 Kalju Nomme 29 15 5 9 50
5 Tammeka 29 14 2 13 44
6 Laagri 29 11 2 16 35
7 Vaprus 29 10 4 15 34
8 Kuressaare 29 8 5 16 29
9 Nõmme United 29 9 1 19 28
10 Trans Narva 29 5 4 20 19
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 FC Levadia Tallinn 29 81 21 +60 72
2 Flora Tallinn 29 59 39 +20 55
3 Kalju Nomme 29 52 27 +25 50
4 Paide 29 48 36 +12 51
5 Nõmme United 29 47 68 -21 28
6 Laagri 29 40 47 -7 35
7 Vaprus 29 39 57 -18 34
8 Tammeka 29 37 47 -10 44
9 Kuressaare 29 31 49 -18 29
10 Trans Narva 29 22 65 -43 19