Fort Lauderdale CF vs Chattanooga Statistics & Analysis

Fort Lauderdale CF

Jul 31, 2026 - 23:00

0 1.20

1 1.40

xG Accuracy: 64%

Chattanooga

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

Market Prediction Result Outcome
Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Under 2.5 (1 goals) ✔ Correct
Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes No ✖ Incorrect
1X2 Chattanooga Chattanooga ✔ Correct
Correct Score Insights 1-1, 0-1, 1-0, 1-2, 2-1 0-1 ✔ Correct

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Jul 25, 2026 · 05:30 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-1679970

Closing Odds 1.35

AI Fair Odds —

CLV +0.0%

Final Result Chattanooga win · Fort Lauderdale CF 0–1 Chattanooga

Prediction ✔ Correct

Decision Grade B-

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Market intelligence

Supporting read on how the prioritized closing feed moved versus the model — use after the Primary pick above.

Market briefing

Market remained largely stable before kickoff. No meaningful late implied-price shift was detected between PRE30 and PRE1 on the prioritized bookmaker snapshot.

Despite limited late movement, the model still prices Fort Lauderdale CF (1X2), Draw (1X2), Under 2.5 goals meaningfully above what those closing snapshots implied — that gap is a static “model vs. price” read, not a late steam or chase story.

The model still exceeds closing implied on Under 2.5 goals by about 18.7 percentage points — the clearest mispricing signal summarized on this page.

Model vs. closing implied

Market	Model %	Closing impl. %	Gap (pp)
Fort Lauderdale CF (1X2)	30.6	14.3	+16.3
Draw (1X2)	29.5	17.9	+11.6
Chattanooga (1X2)	40.0	67.8	-27.9
Over 2.5 goals	48.2	66.9	-18.7
Under 2.5 goals	51.8	33.1	+18.7

What this means

In plain terms: the model lands near 51.8% on Under 2.5 goals, while the closing snapshot implied about 33.1%. The difference — about 18.7 percentage points — is the largest model-vs.-market gap highlighted on this page.

Quick definitions: “closing implied” is the probability for that outcome implied by the final captured odds (after a simple de-vig). “Gap (pp)” is the model percentage minus that implied value, in percentage points (pp).

Closing-window line move

Single prioritized bookmaker per snapshot (not all books). Capture path: PRE30 → PRE1 · Book: Pinnacle

Column tags in parentheses: Closing uses the first available snapshot in PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Early uses the first available in PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 that is not the same capture as Closing.

Detailed capture odds are folded below — movement was negligible on de-vig implied prices.

View full line-by-line capture table

Market	Early (PRE30)	Closing (PRE1)
Fort Lauderdale CF (1X2)	6.42	6.42
Draw (1X2)	5.11	5.11
Chattanooga (1X2)	1.35	1.35
Over 2.5 goals	1.39	1.39
Under 2.5 goals	2.81	2.81

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Quick read on how the model reads this matchup.

League: MLS Next Pro
Fixture: Fort Lauderdale CF vs Chattanooga
Kickoff: 2026-07-31 23:00:00
1X2 (model): Home 30.6% · Draw 29.5% · Away 40.0%
xG (showing): Fort Lauderdale CF 1.2 — Chattanooga 1.4 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
Value headline: At least one tracked line reaches the headline EV threshold — align with the hero / Primary card if shown.
Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 51.8% · Over 2.5 48.2%); BTTS Yes (Yes 54.3% · No 45.7%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS No
BTTS (model): Yes 54.3% · No 45.7%
Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (12.5%)

Saying “no value” on a snapshot is a feature, not a bug: it protects readers from forcing a play when the edge is not there.

Prefer skipping to over-staking when the engine is honest about missing edge.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: Wait - No Primary Bet

Outcome: Validated — Pre-match lean validated against the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 16, 2026 (UTC)

Explore More Predictions Content

Get Premium Predictions for Fort Lauderdale CF & Chattanooga!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now

Back to Statistics

MLS Next Pro — Standings

#	TEAM	MP	W	L	PTS
1	New York RB II	27	15	12	46
1	Crown Legacy	26	19	7	54
1	Austin II	26	19	7	59
2	Columbus Crew II	27	16	11	46
2	Chattanooga	26	17	9	50
2	Portland Timbers II	26	18	8	54
3	New York City II	27	15	12	45
3	Atlanta United II	26	14	12	45
3	Houston Dynamo FC II	26	18	8	51
4	New England II	27	15	12	45
4	LA Galaxy II	26	17	9	50
5	Connecticut FC	27	15	12	43
5	St. Louis City II	26	14	12	43
6	Bethlehem Steel	27	14	13	42
6	Los Angeles II	26	13	13	42
7	Toronto II	27	13	14	39
7	Tacoma Defiance	26	13	13	39
8	FC Cincinnati II	27	7	20	20
8	North Texas	26	13	13	38
9	Orlando City II	26	14	12	41
9	Minnesota United II	25	12	13	37
10	San Jose Earthquakes II	26	12	14	36
11	Real Monarchs	25	11	14	29
12	Chicago Fire II	26	13	13	39
12	Whitecaps II	26	10	16	27
13	Huntsville City	26	12	14	38
13	Swope Park Rangers	26	6	20	20
14	Carolina Core	26	9	17	28
14	Colorado Rapids II	26	5	21	18
16	Fort Lauderdale CF	26	4	22	15

#	TEAM	MP	GS	GC	+/-	PTS
1	Crown Legacy	26	63	36	+27	54
2	Atlanta United II	26	57	40	+17	45
3	New York RB II	27	57	46	+11	46
4	LA Galaxy II	26	54	34	+20	50
5	Connecticut FC	27	52	50	+2	43
6	Austin II	26	51	21	+30	59
7	Houston Dynamo FC II	26	51	30	+21	51
8	Chattanooga	26	51	38	+13	50
9	Orlando City II	26	50	51	-1	41
10	New York City II	27	49	43	+6	45
11	Chicago Fire II	26	49	45	+4	39
12	Columbus Crew II	27	48	42	+6	46
13	Toronto II	27	47	53	-6	39
14	San Jose Earthquakes II	26	45	36	+9	36
15	New England II	27	44	41	+3	45
16	Los Angeles II	26	43	44	-1	42
17	Huntsville City	26	43	45	-2	38
18	St. Louis City II	26	41	37	+4	43
19	North Texas	26	41	39	+2	38
20	Tacoma Defiance	26	39	40	-1	39
21	Whitecaps II	26	38	55	-17	27
22	Carolina Core	26	37	50	-13	28
23	Bethlehem Steel	27	36	39	-3	42
24	Real Monarchs	25	36	50	-14	29
25	Portland Timbers II	26	35	27	+8	54
26	Minnesota United II	25	35	36	-1	37
27	Swope Park Rangers	26	32	68	-36	20
28	FC Cincinnati II	27	31	60	-29	20
29	Fort Lauderdale CF	26	27	63	-36	15
30	Colorado Rapids II	26	26	50	-24	18