Statistics / Football / Chile. Primera División / Huachipato vs O'Higgins

Huachipato vs O'Higgins Statistics & Analysis

Huachipato Huachipato
Oct 10, 2026 - 20:30
2 1.34
0 1.35
xG Accuracy: 58%
O'Higgins O'Higgins
Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Under 2.5 (2 goals) ✔ Correct
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS No No ✔ Correct
  • 1X2 O'Higgins Huachipato ✖ Incorrect
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 0-1, 1-0, 1-2, 2-1 2-0 ✖ Incorrect

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Oct 05, 2026 · 04:27 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-13252495

Closing Odds 3.4
AI Fair Odds —
CLV +0.0%
Final Result Huachipato win · Huachipato 2–0 O'Higgins
Prediction ✖ Missed
Decision Grade C

Market intelligence

Supporting read on how the prioritized closing feed moved versus the model — use after the Primary pick above.

Market briefing

Market remained largely stable before kickoff. No meaningful late implied-price shift was detected between PRE20 and PRE1 on the prioritized bookmaker snapshot.

Despite limited late movement, the model still prices Draw (1X2) meaningfully above what those closing snapshots implied — that gap is a static “model vs. price” read, not a late steam or chase story.

The model still exceeds closing implied on Draw (1X2) by about 2.2 percentage points — the clearest mispricing signal summarized on this page.

Model vs. closing implied

Market Model % Closing impl. % Gap (pp)
Huachipato (1X2) 35.2 36.6 -1.4
Draw (1X2) 29.1 26.9 +2.2
O'Higgins (1X2) 35.7 36.6 -0.8
What this means

In plain terms: the model lands near 29.1% on Draw (1X2), while the closing snapshot implied about 26.9%. The difference — about 2.2 percentage points — is the largest model-vs.-market gap highlighted on this page.

Quick definitions: “closing implied” is the probability for that outcome implied by the final captured odds (after a simple de-vig). “Gap (pp)” is the model percentage minus that implied value, in percentage points (pp).

Closing-window line move

Single prioritized bookmaker per snapshot (not all books). Capture path: PRE20 → PRE1 · Book: bet365 us

Column tags in parentheses: Closing uses the first available snapshot in PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Early uses the first available in PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 that is not the same capture as Closing.

Detailed capture odds are folded below — movement was negligible on de-vig implied prices.

View full line-by-line capture table
Market Early (PRE20) Closing (PRE1) Implied Δ (pp)
Huachipato (1X2) 2.5 2.5 0.0
Draw (1X2) 3.4 3.4 0.0
O'Higgins (1X2) 2.5 2.5 0.0

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Below is a compact, numbers-first snapshot aligned with the same engine as the cards above.

  • League: Primera División
  • Fixture: Huachipato vs O'Higgins
  • Kickoff: 2026-10-10 20:30:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 35.2% · Draw 29.1% · Away 35.7%
  • xG (showing): Huachipato 1.34 — O'Higgins 1.35 (total xG ≈ 2.69)
  • Best +EV line (same label as hero card when Primary thresholds are not met): Under 2.5 goals
  • Model: 49.6% · Implied: 45.2% · Probability edge: +4.4 pts · Est. EV: +6.6%
  • BTTS (model): Yes 56.3% · No 43.7%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (12.3%)

Where EV is shown, it is estimated return per unit stake at the best tracked decimal price — not the same thing as a raw probability gap.

1X2 can look balanced even when side markets show clearer structure.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: No Primary Bet

Outcome: Missed — Pre-match 1X2 lean did not match the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

October 16, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for Huachipato & O'Higgins!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Statistics
Primera División Primera División — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Colo Colo 23 17 3 3 54
2 U. Catolica 23 13 3 7 42
3 Universidad de Chile 23 12 6 5 42
4 Everton de Vina 23 10 6 7 36
5 Palestino 23 11 3 9 36
6 Deportes Limache 23 10 3 10 33
7 Nublense 23 8 8 7 32
8 Concepción 23 9 4 10 31
9 D. La Serena 23 7 9 7 30
10 Coquimbo Unido 22 8 5 9 29
11 A. Italiano 23 7 7 9 28
12 Huachipato 22 8 4 10 28
13 O'Higgins 23 8 3 12 27
14 Cobresal 23 7 3 13 24
15 Universidad de Concepcion 23 6 4 13 22
16 Union La Calera 23 4 5 14 17
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 U. Catolica 23 50 33 +17 42
2 Colo Colo 23 48 22 +26 54
3 Deportes Limache 23 43 35 +8 33
4 Everton de Vina 23 37 25 +12 36
5 Palestino 23 36 33 +3 36
6 Universidad de Chile 23 35 19 +16 42
7 D. La Serena 23 34 38 -4 30
8 Cobresal 23 34 44 -10 24
9 Coquimbo Unido 22 31 31 0 29
10 Huachipato 22 31 39 -8 28
11 Nublense 23 28 31 -3 32
12 O'Higgins 23 28 36 -8 27
13 A. Italiano 23 26 31 -5 28
14 Concepción 23 25 26 -1 31
15 Union La Calera 23 19 40 -21 17
16 Universidad de Concepcion 23 17 39 -22 22
# TEAM MP xG xGC +/- PTS
1 Universidad de Chile 23 2.7 0.6 +2.1 42
2 Concepción 23 1.8 0.5 +1.3 31
3 Everton de Vina 23 2.3 1.2 +1.1 36
4 Cobresal 23 1.7 0.8 +0.9 24
5 Deportes Limache 23 1.6 1.3 +0.3 33
6 U. Catolica 23 1.5 1.2 +0.3 42
7 Huachipato 22 1.1 0.8 +0.3 28
8 Palestino 23 1.3 1.6 -0.3 36
9 O'Higgins 23 0.8 1.1 -0.3 27
10 Universidad de Concepcion 23 0.8 1.7 -0.9 22
11 D. La Serena 23 1.2 2.3 -1.1 30
12 Union La Calera 23 0.5 1.8 -1.3 17
13 Nublense 23 1.7 4.2 -2.5 32
14 Colo Colo 23 — — — 54
15 Coquimbo Unido 22 — — — 29
16 A. Italiano 23 — — — 28