Statistics / Football / Sweden. Elitettan / Linköping vs Husqvarna W

Linköping vs Husqvarna W Statistics & Analysis

Linköping Linköping
Sep 18, 2026 - 17:00
2 1.32
1 1.28
xG Accuracy: 77%
Husqvarna W Husqvarna W
Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (3 goals) ✖ Incorrect
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS No Yes ✖ Incorrect
  • 1X2 Linköping Linköping ✔ Correct
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 2-1 ✔ Correct

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Sep 12, 2026 · 01:50 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-8207355

Closing Odds 1.3
AI Fair Odds —
CLV +0.0%
Final Result Linköping win · Linköping 2–1 Husqvarna W
Prediction ✔ Correct
Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Market intelligence

Supporting read on how the prioritized closing feed moved versus the model — use after the Primary pick above.

Market briefing

Market remained largely stable before kickoff. No meaningful late implied-price shift was detected between PRE30 and PRE1 on the prioritized bookmaker snapshot.

Despite limited late movement, the model still prices Draw (1X2), Husqvarna W (1X2), Under 2.5 goals meaningfully above what those closing snapshots implied — that gap is a static “model vs. price” read, not a late steam or chase story.

The model still exceeds closing implied on Under 2.5 goals by about 22.8 percentage points — the clearest mispricing signal summarized on this page.

Model vs. closing implied

Market Model % Closing impl. % Gap (pp)
Linköping (1X2) 36.1 68.7 -32.6
Draw (1X2) 29.7 17.0 +12.7
Husqvarna W (1X2) 34.2 14.3 +19.9
Over 2.5 goals 48.2 71.0 -22.8
Under 2.5 goals 51.8 29.0 +22.8
What this means

In plain terms: the model lands near 51.8% on Under 2.5 goals, while the closing snapshot implied about 29.0%. The difference — about 22.8 percentage points — is the largest model-vs.-market gap highlighted on this page.

Quick definitions: “closing implied” is the probability for that outcome implied by the final captured odds (after a simple de-vig). “Gap (pp)” is the model percentage minus that implied value, in percentage points (pp).

Closing-window line move

Single prioritized bookmaker per snapshot (not all books). Capture path: PRE30 → PRE1 · Book: Bet365

Column tags in parentheses: Closing uses the first available snapshot in PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Early uses the first available in PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 that is not the same capture as Closing.

Detailed capture odds are folded below — movement was negligible on de-vig implied prices.

View full line-by-line capture table
Market Early (PRE30) Closing (PRE1) Implied Δ (pp)
Linköping (1X2) 1.3 1.3 0.0
Draw (1X2) 5.25 5.25 0.0
Husqvarna W (1X2) 6.25 6.25 0.0
Over 2.5 goals 1.33 1.33 0.0
Under 2.5 goals 3.25 3.25 0.0

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Model favours Linköping; market prices Linköping instead — inputs may be missing or stale.

  • Model: Linköping 1.32 xG vs Husqvarna W 1.28 → Linköping 36.1%
  • Market: Linköping ~68.7% implied
  • Validation failed — do not treat 1X2 EV as actionable.

Do not act on 1X2 value until validation passes. Structural leans (O/U, BTTS) need separate odds review.

Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 51.8% · Over 2.5 48.2%); BTTS Yes (Yes 54.5% · No 45.5%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS No

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: Wait - No Primary Bet

Outcome: Validated — Pre-match lean validated against the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 28, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for Linköping & Husqvarna W!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Statistics
Elitettan Elitettan — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Elfsborg 20 13 6 1 45
2 KIF Örebro 20 14 2 4 44
3 Göteborg 20 12 6 2 42
4 Linköping 20 13 3 4 42
5 Umeå 20 10 4 6 34
6 Trelleborg W 20 9 5 6 32
7 Husqvarna W 20 8 4 8 28
8 Jitex W 20 6 6 8 24
9 Örebro Söder W 20 6 5 9 23
10 Alingsås W 20 4 7 9 19
11 Enskede W 20 5 4 11 19
12 Gamla Upsala W 20 4 5 11 17
13 Sandviken W 20 2 5 13 11
14 Häcken II 20 2 2 16 8
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Göteborg 20 50 23 +27 42
2 KIF Örebro 20 43 25 +18 44
3 Linköping 20 38 26 +12 42
4 Elfsborg 20 37 10 +27 45
5 Umeå 20 35 24 +11 34
6 Trelleborg W 20 28 27 +1 32
7 Husqvarna W 20 28 30 -2 28
8 Enskede W 20 27 38 -11 19
9 Jitex W 20 26 29 -3 24
10 Örebro Söder W 20 23 30 -7 23
11 Gamla Upsala W 20 21 33 -12 17
12 Häcken II 20 20 42 -22 8
13 Sandviken W 20 20 49 -29 11
14 Alingsås W 20 17 27 -10 19
Elitettan Sweden. Elitettan Predictions