Statistics / Football / Norway. 3. Division - Girone 1 / Heming vs Ullern

Heming vs Ullern Statistics & Analysis

Heming Heming
Sep 26, 2026 - 11:00
3 1.33
0 1.27
xG Accuracy: 45%
Ullern Ullern
Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (3 goals) ✖ Incorrect
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS No No ✔ Correct
  • 1X2 Heming Heming ✔ Correct
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 3-0 ✖ Incorrect

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Sep 21, 2026 · 00:49 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-10079403

Closing Odds 1.57
AI Fair Odds —
CLV +0.0%
Final Result Heming win · Heming 3–0 Ullern
Prediction ✔ Correct
Decision Grade B-

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Market intelligence

Supporting read on how the prioritized closing feed moved versus the model — use after the Primary pick above.

Market briefing

Market remained largely stable before kickoff. No meaningful late implied-price shift was detected between PRE30 and PRE1 on the prioritized bookmaker snapshot.

Despite limited late movement, the model still prices Draw (1X2), Ullern (1X2) meaningfully above what those closing snapshots implied — that gap is a static “model vs. price” read, not a late steam or chase story.

The model still exceeds closing implied on Draw (1X2) by about 13.6 percentage points — the clearest mispricing signal summarized on this page.

Model vs. closing implied

Market Model % Closing impl. % Gap (pp)
Heming (1X2) 36.6 56.5 -19.9
Draw (1X2) 29.6 16.1 +13.6
Ullern (1X2) 33.8 27.4 +6.4
What this means

In plain terms: the model lands near 29.6% on Draw (1X2), while the closing snapshot implied about 16.1%. The difference — about 13.6 percentage points — is the largest model-vs.-market gap highlighted on this page.

Quick definitions: “closing implied” is the probability for that outcome implied by the final captured odds (after a simple de-vig). “Gap (pp)” is the model percentage minus that implied value, in percentage points (pp).

Closing-window line move

Single prioritized bookmaker per snapshot (not all books). Capture path: PRE30 → PRE1 · Book: Pinnacle

Column tags in parentheses: Closing uses the first available snapshot in PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Early uses the first available in PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 that is not the same capture as Closing.

Detailed capture odds are folded below — movement was negligible on de-vig implied prices.

View full line-by-line capture table
Market Early (PRE30) Closing (PRE1) Implied Δ (pp)
Heming (1X2) 1.57 1.57 0.0
Draw (1X2) 5.52 5.52 0.0
Ullern (1X2) 3.24 3.24 0.0

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Pre-match snapshot for this fixture.

  • League: 3. Division - Girone 1
  • Fixture: Heming vs Ullern
  • Kickoff: 2026-09-26 11:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 36.6% · Draw 29.6% · Away 33.8%
  • xG (showing): Heming 1.33 — Ullern 1.27 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
  • Value headline: None (actionable) — best tracked EV is about +1.7%, still below the +2.0% minimum for a headline / default stake (no default bet).
  • Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 51.8% · Over 2.5 48.2%); BTTS No (Yes 54.5% · No 45.5%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS No
  • BTTS (model): Yes 54.5% · No 45.5%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (12.5%)

When book depth is thin or odds are missing, EV may be unavailable even though the model still prefers one side on totals or BTTS — wait for cleaner prices or skip.

If lines move materially, re-run generation or refresh — implied probabilities and any future EV readouts will change first.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: No Primary Bet

Outcome: Validated — Pre-match lean validated against the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 28, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for Heming & Ullern!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Statistics
3. Division - Girone 1 3. Division - Girone 1 — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Asker 20 18 1 1 55
2 Heming 21 13 3 5 42
3 Gamle Oslo 21 13 1 7 40
4 Bærum 21 11 2 8 35
5 Vålerenga II 21 11 1 9 34
6 IF Ready 21 9 6 6 33
7 Frigg 20 9 5 6 32
8 Union Carl Berner 20 10 1 9 31
9 KFUM II 20 7 2 11 23
10 Lokomotiv Oslo 21 7 2 12 23
11 Nordstrand 21 6 2 13 20
12 Ullern 21 6 2 13 20
13 Konnerud 21 5 1 15 16
14 SF Grei 21 5 1 15 16
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Asker 20 71 25 +46 55
2 Gamle Oslo 21 68 41 +27 40
3 Bærum 21 61 39 +22 35
4 Heming 21 53 31 +22 42
5 IF Ready 21 53 42 +11 33
6 Frigg 20 49 44 +5 32
7 Vålerenga II 21 47 58 -11 34
8 KFUM II 20 41 58 -17 23
9 Ullern 21 39 57 -18 20
10 Lokomotiv Oslo 21 39 61 -22 23
11 Nordstrand 21 36 48 -12 20
12 SF Grei 21 36 69 -33 16
13 Union Carl Berner 20 35 30 +5 31
14 Konnerud 21 29 54 -25 16
3. Division - Girone 1 Norway. 3. Division - Girone 1 Predictions