Trygg/Lade vs Levanger Statistics & Analysis

Sep 20, 2026 - 16:00
0 1.36
1 1.24
xG Accuracy: 64%
Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Under 2.5 (1 goals) ✔ Correct
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS No No ✔ Correct
  • 1X2 Trygg/Lade Levanger ✖ Incorrect
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 0-1 ✔ Correct

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Sep 14, 2026 · 02:19 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-8688112

Closing Odds 1.32
AI Fair Odds —
CLV +0.0%
Final Result Levanger win · Trygg/Lade 0–1 Levanger
Prediction ✖ Missed
Decision Grade C

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Market intelligence

Supporting read on how the prioritized closing feed moved versus the model — use after the Primary pick above.

Market briefing

Market remained largely stable before kickoff. No meaningful late implied-price shift was detected between PRE30 and PRE5 on the prioritized bookmaker snapshot.

Despite limited late movement, the model still prices Trygg/Lade (1X2), Draw (1X2), Under 2.5 goals meaningfully above what those closing snapshots implied — that gap is a static “model vs. price” read, not a late steam or chase story.

The model still exceeds closing implied on Trygg/Lade (1X2) by about 23.6 percentage points — the clearest mispricing signal summarized on this page.

Model vs. closing implied

Market Model % Closing impl. % Gap (pp)
Trygg/Lade (1X2) 38.0 14.4 +23.6
Draw (1X2) 29.6 16.1 +13.5
Levanger (1X2) 32.4 69.5 -37.1
Over 2.5 goals 48.2 65.0 -16.8
Under 2.5 goals 51.8 35.0 +16.8
What this means

In plain terms: the model lands near 38.0% on Trygg/Lade (1X2), while the closing snapshot implied about 14.4%. The difference — about 23.6 percentage points — is the largest model-vs.-market gap highlighted on this page.

Quick definitions: “closing implied” is the probability for that outcome implied by the final captured odds (after a simple de-vig). “Gap (pp)” is the model percentage minus that implied value, in percentage points (pp).

Closing-window line move

Single prioritized bookmaker per snapshot (not all books). Capture path: PRE30 → PRE5 · Book: Pinnacle

Column tags in parentheses: Closing uses the first available snapshot in PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Early uses the first available in PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 that is not the same capture as Closing.

Detailed capture odds are folded below — movement was negligible on de-vig implied prices.

View full line-by-line capture table
Market Early (PRE30) Closing (PRE5) Implied Δ (pp)
Trygg/Lade (1X2) 6.35 6.35 0.0
Draw (1X2) 5.69 5.69 0.0
Levanger (1X2) 1.32 1.32 0.0
Over 2.5 goals 1.43 1.43 0.0
Under 2.5 goals 2.66 2.66 0.0

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Model favours Trygg/Lade; market prices Levanger instead — inputs may be missing or stale.

  • Model: Trygg/Lade 1.36 xG vs Levanger 1.24 → Trygg/Lade 38.0%
  • Market: Levanger ~14.4% implied
  • Validation failed — do not treat 1X2 EV as actionable.

Do not act on 1X2 value until validation passes. Structural leans (O/U, BTTS) need separate odds review.

Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 51.8% · Over 2.5 48.2%); BTTS Yes (Yes 54.4% · No 45.6%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS No

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: Wait - No Primary Bet

Outcome: Missed — Pre-match 1X2 lean did not match the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 26, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for Trygg/Lade & Levanger!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Statistics
2. Division - Group 2 2. Division - Group 2 — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Eidsvold 20 15 3 2 48
2 Levanger 20 15 0 5 45
3 Kjelsås 20 14 1 5 43
4 Hønefoss 20 13 3 4 42
5 Grorud 20 11 4 5 37
6 Lørenskog 20 9 3 8 30
7 Tromsdalen Uil 20 9 2 9 29
8 Junkeren 20 8 4 8 28
9 Stjørdals-Blink 20 8 3 9 27
10 Rana 20 7 3 10 24
11 Skeid 20 5 2 13 17
12 Follo 20 3 4 13 13
13 Ull/Kisa 20 3 1 16 10
14 Trygg/Lade 20 2 3 15 9
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Levanger 20 51 21 +30 45
2 Hønefoss 20 51 28 +23 42
3 Eidsvold 20 48 16 +32 48
4 Kjelsås 20 47 29 +18 43
5 Grorud 20 34 20 +14 37
6 Tromsdalen Uil 20 34 34 0 29
7 Stjørdals-Blink 20 34 38 -4 27
8 Rana 20 34 38 -4 24
9 Lørenskog 20 29 32 -3 30
10 Junkeren 20 29 33 -4 28
11 Skeid 20 27 43 -16 17
12 Ull/Kisa 20 25 67 -42 10
13 Follo 20 23 43 -20 13
14 Trygg/Lade 20 23 47 -24 9