Statistics / Football / USA. USL League One / Naples vs Richmond Kickers

Naples vs Richmond Kickers Statistics & Analysis

Oct 07, 2026 - 23:00
2 1.35
0 1.25
xG Accuracy: 59%
Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Under 2.5 (2 goals) ✔ Correct
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes No ✖ Incorrect
  • 1X2 Naples Naples ✔ Correct
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 2-0 ✖ Incorrect

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Oct 01, 2026 · 02:19 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-12191253

Closing Odds 1.51
AI Fair Odds —
CLV +0.0%
Final Result Naples win · Naples 2–0 Richmond Kickers
Prediction ✔ Correct
Decision Grade B-

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Market intelligence

Supporting read on how the prioritized closing feed moved versus the model — use after the Primary pick above.

Market briefing

Market remained largely stable before kickoff. No meaningful late implied-price shift was detected between PRE5 and PRE1 on the prioritized bookmaker snapshot.

Despite limited late movement, the model still prices Draw (1X2), Richmond Kickers (1X2) meaningfully above what those closing snapshots implied — that gap is a static “model vs. price” read, not a late steam or chase story.

The model still exceeds closing implied on Richmond Kickers (1X2) by about 14.5 percentage points — the clearest mispricing signal summarized on this page.

Model vs. closing implied

Market Model % Closing impl. % Gap (pp)
Naples (1X2) 37.6 60.8 -23.2
Draw (1X2) 29.6 20.9 +8.7
Richmond Kickers (1X2) 32.9 18.4 +14.5
What this means

In plain terms: the model lands near 32.9% on Richmond Kickers (1X2), while the closing snapshot implied about 18.4%. The difference — about 14.5 percentage points — is the largest model-vs.-market gap highlighted on this page.

Quick definitions: “closing implied” is the probability for that outcome implied by the final captured odds (after a simple de-vig). “Gap (pp)” is the model percentage minus that implied value, in percentage points (pp).

Closing-window line move

Single prioritized bookmaker per snapshot (not all books). Capture path: PRE5 → PRE1 · Book: draftkings

Column tags in parentheses: Closing uses the first available snapshot in PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Early uses the first available in PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 that is not the same capture as Closing.

Detailed capture odds are folded below — movement was negligible on de-vig implied prices.

View full line-by-line capture table
Market Early (PRE5) Closing (PRE1) Implied Δ (pp)
Naples (1X2) 1.51 1.51 0.0
Draw (1X2) 4.4 4.4 0.0
Richmond Kickers (1X2) 5.0 5.0 0.0

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Pre-match snapshot for this fixture.

  • League: USL League One
  • Fixture: Naples vs Richmond Kickers
  • Kickoff: 2026-10-07 23:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 37.6% · Draw 29.6% · Away 32.9%
  • xG (showing): Naples 1.35 — Richmond Kickers 1.25 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
  • Value headline: At least one tracked line reaches the headline EV threshold — align with the hero / Primary card if shown.
  • Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 51.8% · Over 2.5 48.2%); BTTS Yes (Yes 54.5% · No 45.5%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS No
  • BTTS (model): Yes 54.5% · No 45.5%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (12.5%)

The decision block shows no default Primary: Primary needs consensus EV ≥ +5.0% plus strength/reliability/calibration gates. A separate Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only). Lean labels are directional only — not bankroll-sized recommendations.

Most likely correct score stays a low-probability tail: use it for context, not as a must-bet story.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: Wait - No Primary Bet

Outcome: Validated — Pre-match lean validated against the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

October 10, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for Naples & Richmond Kickers!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Statistics
USL League One USL League One — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Union Omaha 29 19 4 6 61
2 Charlotte Independence 29 18 6 5 60
3 Forward Madison 29 15 7 7 52
4 Boise 29 14 7 8 49
5 One Knoxville 29 13 9 7 48
6 Spokane Velocity 27 14 5 8 47
7 Chattanooga Red Wolves 29 14 4 11 46
8 Fort Wayne 28 10 9 9 39
9 Corpus Christi 28 9 9 10 36
10 Naples 28 10 4 14 34
11 Westchester SC 29 9 6 14 33
12 Sarasota Paradise 28 9 6 13 33
13 Alta 29 8 8 13 32
14 Portland Hearts of Pine 29 7 10 12 31
15 NY Cosmos 28 7 4 17 25
16 Greenville Triumph 28 6 5 17 23
17 Richmond Kickers 28 6 5 17 23
18 Tormenta 0 0 0 0 0
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Charlotte Independence 29 67 42 +25 60
2 Union Omaha 29 53 31 +22 61
3 Forward Madison 29 50 27 +23 52
4 Chattanooga Red Wolves 29 50 40 +10 46
5 Westchester SC 29 48 46 +2 33
6 One Knoxville 29 46 34 +12 48
7 Boise 29 45 39 +6 49
8 Portland Hearts of Pine 29 43 53 -10 31
9 Fort Wayne 28 42 36 +6 39
10 Spokane Velocity 27 41 36 +5 47
11 Sarasota Paradise 28 39 43 -4 33
12 NY Cosmos 28 36 56 -20 25
13 Alta 29 35 42 -7 32
14 Corpus Christi 28 32 40 -8 36
15 Naples 28 32 44 -12 34
16 Greenville Triumph 28 30 52 -22 23
17 Richmond Kickers 28 30 58 -28 23
18 Tormenta 0 0 0 0 0